Active Learning LMS

An Active Learning LMS represents a shift from traditional Learning Management Systems that primarily serve as repositories for passive content consumption. Instead, these platforms are designed to actively involve learners in the learning process through interaction, application, collaboration, and reflection. The core philosophy behind an Active Learning LMS is grounded in educational principles suggesting that learners retain information better and develop deeper understanding when they actively participate rather than simply reading text or watching videos. 

These platforms incorporate features and functionalities specifically aimed at encouraging "learning by doing," problem-solving, critical thinking, and peer interaction, transforming the LMS from a content delivery mechanism into a dynamic environment for skill development and knowledge construction. For example, the AFT Learning Model by MyQuest provides provides more-engaged learning through action-based strategies.

Defining Active Learning in an LMS Context

Active learning, within the context of an LMS, refers to instructional approaches and platform features that promote learner engagement beyond passive reception of information. It's about creating opportunities within the digital learning environment for learners to interact with the material, apply concepts, collaborate with peers (Bates et al., 2012), and receive feedback. 

Key elements defining active learning in this context include:

• Learner Participation: Requiring learners to do more than just click "next" or watch a video. This involves tasks, exercises, discussions (Bullen et al., 1998), or simulations (Vogel-Walcutt et al., 2011).
• Higher-Order Thinking: Designing activities that encourage analysis, synthesis, evaluation, problem-solving, and critical thinking, rather than just memorization.
  
  • Tip: Ensure your active learning activities genuinely require higher-order thinking; use scenario analysis, problem-solving tasks, or comparative evaluations rather than simple interactive quizzes disguised as active learning.
• Application of Knowledge: Providing opportunities for learners to apply newly acquired knowledge or skills in realistic scenarios (Richey et al., 2023) or practice exercises within the LMS.
• Interaction: Facilitating interaction (Strother et al., 2002) between the learner and the content (e.g., interactive elements [Ruiz et al., 2006]), the learner and the instructor/facilitator (e.g., Q&A, feedback), and learner-to-learner (e.g., discussions, peer reviews [Eom et al., 2018; Wang, 2011]).
• Reflection: Incorporating moments for learners to reflect on what they've learned, how it applies to their work, or challenges they encountered during activities.
• Constructivism: Aligning with the theory that learners construct their own understanding and knowledge through experiences and interactions. The LMS becomes a facilitator of this construction process.
  ‍

Tip: When designing courses, explicitly map each learning objective to a specific active learning feature within the LMS (like a simulation for application or a forum for interaction) to ensure intentional engagement.

An Active Learning LMS, therefore, is intentionally designed or configured to support these elements through its features and how content is structured within it.

Contrast with Passive Learning Models

Traditional LMS platforms often facilitate passive learning models, where the primary focus is on efficient delivery and tracking of standardized content. Understanding the contrast highlights the unique value of an active learning approach:

• Passive Model Focus: Efficient distribution of information (videos, PDFs, presentations), tracking completion, ensuring compliance. The learner is primarily a receiver of information.
• Active Model Focus: Deepening understanding, developing skills through practice, fostering critical thinking, encouraging collaboration. The learner is an active participant in constructing knowledge.
• Content Interaction (Passive): Primarily reading, watching, listening. Limited interaction, often just navigation controls or simple multiple-choice quizzes for recall.
• Content Interaction (Active): Manipulating simulations (Vogel-Walcutt et al., 2011), participating in branching scenarios (Richey et al., 2023), contributing to discussions, completing interactive exercises (Ruiz et al., 2006; Strother et al., 2002), annotating content, solving problems within the platform.
• Assessment (Passive): Typically focuses on knowledge recall through quizzes or simple tests measuring memorization.
• Assessment (Active): Often involves performance-based tasks, problem-solving scenarios, project submissions, peer assessments (Wang, 2011), or simulations that measure application and critical thinking.
• Learner Role (Passive): Consumer of content. Follows a linear path.
• Learner Role (Active): Investigator, collaborator, creator, problem-solver. May have more agency in navigating learning activities.
• Platform Role (Passive): Content repository and tracking tool.
• Platform Role (Active): Interactive learning environment, collaboration hub, practice field, feedback facilitator.
  ‍

While passive learning has its place for information dissemination, an Active Learning LMS aims to provide a richer, more engaging, and ultimately more effective learning experience for skill development and behavioral change.

Tip: Prioritize using active learning features in your LMS for training focused on complex skills or behavioral change, reserving passive delivery methods primarily for foundational knowledge transfer or compliance updates.

Core LMS Features Enabling Active Learning

To facilitate active engagement, these platforms incorporate specific features that go beyond simple content hosting and tracking. 

Key features enabling active learning include:

• Interactive Content Support: Ability to host and track rich interactive content formats, such as:
  
  • Simulations: Allowing learners to practice complex procedures or decision-making in a safe, virtual environment (Vogel-Walcutt et al., 2011).
  • Branching Scenarios: Presenting learners with choices that lead down different paths, forcing them to apply knowledge in context-dependent situations.
    
    • Tip: When using branching scenarios in your LMS, ensure each path provides meaningful feedback explaining the consequences of the choices made, reinforcing the learning objective effectively.
  • Interactive Videos: Embedding questions, polls, or decision points directly within video content.
  • Gamified Elements: Incorporating points, badges, leaderboards (Ibáñez et al., 2014), challenges, and progress bars tied to completing active tasks, not just viewing content (Sitzmann, 2011b).

• Assessment Variety: Supporting diverse assessment types beyond multiple-choice, including short answer/essay questions (potentially with AI feedback), file uploads for project work, peer assessment tools (Wang, 2011), and observation checklists for real-world task verification (Govindasamy et al., 2001).

• Collaboration Tools: Integrated features that promote peer-to-peer learning (Bates et al., 2012):
  
  • Discussion Forums: Dedicated spaces for learners to discuss topics, ask questions, share insights, and debate ideas related to course content (Cheng et al., 2011).
  • Group Workspaces: Areas where small groups can collaborate on projects or assignments, potentially with shared file storage and communication tools.
  • Peer Review Functionality: Tools allowing learners to provide structured feedback (Wang, 2011) on each other's work (e.g., assignments, project submissions).
    
    • Tip: To ensure quality peer feedback within the LMS, provide learners with clear rubrics or specific guiding questions, focusing their feedback on the key learning objectives.

• Assignment Submission and Feedback Tools: Robust systems for learners to submit work (documents, videos, links) and for instructors, managers, or AI to provide detailed, targeted feedback directly within the platform (Sitzmann et al., 2011).

• Integrated Authoring Tools (Sometimes): Some platforms include built-in tools allowing administrators or instructors to easily create simple interactive exercises, quizzes, or scenarios directly within the LMS without needing external software.

• Reflection Prompts/Journals: Features that explicitly prompt learners to reflect on their learning experience, challenges, or application plans, potentially through private journaling tools or structured forum prompts.

The presence and sophistication of these features distinguish an LMS geared towards active learning from a more traditional, passive content delivery system.

The Importance of Practice and Application

A cornerstone of active learning is the opportunity for learners to practice new skills and apply knowledge in relevant contexts (Harun, 2002). An Active Learning LMS facilitates this crucial step, moving beyond theoretical understanding to practical competence:

• Safe Practice Environment: Simulations and virtual labs within the LMS allow learners to practice complex tasks or operate virtual equipment without real-world consequences (e.g., practicing sales conversations, troubleshooting virtual machinery, navigating simulated software).
• Scenario-Based Learning: Branching scenarios require learners to make decisions based on their understanding and see the immediate consequences of those choices, reinforcing correct application (Richey et al., 2023).
• Problem-Based Learning (PBL): The LMS can present learners with realistic problems or case studies, requiring them to research, collaborate, and apply concepts to develop solutions, often submitting their findings via the platform.
• Skill Drills and Exercises: Incorporating interactive exercises (e.g., drag-and-drop activities, labeling diagrams, coding challenges) that allow learners to repeatedly practice specific skills (Ruiz et al., 2006) until mastery (Strother et al., 2002).
• Project-Based Assignments: Assigning projects that require learners to integrate multiple skills and knowledge areas, often culminating in a tangible output submitted through the LMS (e.g., a marketing plan, a code repository link, a design proposal).
• Real-World Task Integration (via xAPI): While the practice might occur outside the LMS, platforms supporting xAPI can potentially track the completion of real-world application tasks, linking formal learning to on-the-job performance.

By embedding opportunities for practice and application directly into the learning journey, the LMS helps solidify understanding and build confidence in applying new skills. Platforms like MyQuest, for example, build entire learning experiences around missions and habits that require learners to actively apply concepts and report on their actions, directly bridging the gap between learning and doing.

Tip: Design practice scenarios and application assignments within the LMS to closely mirror real-world tasks and challenges learners face in their roles, maximizing relevance and skill transfer.

Leveraging Social Collaboration for Active Learning

Humans are often social learners, and Active Learning LMS platforms leverage this by integrating tools that foster collaboration, discussion, and knowledge sharing among peers (Bates et al., 2012). Social learning moves beyond individual consumption and taps into collective intelligence (Arbaugh et al., 2008):

• Shared Understanding through Discussion: Forums allow learners to clarify doubts, challenge assumptions, and build a shared understanding of complex topics by discussing them with peers and instructors. Different perspectives enrich the learning process.
• Peer Teaching and Explanation: Explaining a concept to someone else is a powerful way to solidify one's own understanding (Cheng et al., 2011). Discussion forums and group projects encourage this type of peer teaching.
  
  • Tip: Structure peer teaching activities by assigning specific sub-topics to individuals or small groups to research and then present back to their peers via LMS forums or integrated VILT sessions.
• Collaborative Problem Solving: Group workspaces enable teams to tackle complex problems or projects together (Noe et al., 2014), mirroring real-world teamwork dynamics and allowing learners to leverage each other's strengths (Roffe et al., 2002).
• Constructive Feedback via Peer Review: Structured peer review activities encourage learners to critically analyze the work of others and provide constructive feedback, developing both their analytical skills and their ability to receive feedback gracefully (Wang, 2011).
• Building a Learning Community: Social features help foster a sense of community among learners, increasing motivation and providing a support network. Seeing others' progress or contributions can be highly motivating.
• Crowdsourcing Knowledge: Forums and Q&A sections can become valuable knowledge repositories over time, capturing insights and solutions shared by the learning community.
  ‍

By integrating social tools effectively, the LMS becomes more than just a course delivery platform; it transforms into a vibrant ecosystem where learners actively engage with each other to build knowledge collectively.

Feedback Loops: A Cornerstone of Active Learning

Active learning is most effective when coupled with timely and constructive feedback (Sitzmann et al., 2011). Learners need to know if they are applying concepts correctly, where they are making mistakes, and how they can improve. Read more on the importance of feedback for L&D success, at MyQuest’s blog.

 An Active Learning LMS facilitates various feedback loops:

• Immediate Automated Feedback: Interactive quizzes, simulations (Vogel-Walcutt et al., 2011), and exercises can provide instant feedback, confirming correct answers or guiding learners when they make errors (Ruiz et al., 2006). This immediate reinforcement (or correction) is crucial for learning efficiency (Sitzmann et al., 2011).
• Instructor/Mentor Feedback: Platforms provide tools for instructors, mentors, or managers to review submitted assignments, projects, or recorded practice sessions and provide detailed, personalized written or video feedback (Eom et al., 2018).
• Peer Feedback: As mentioned, structured peer review processes allow learners to receive feedback from multiple perspectives (Wang, 2011), often highlighting aspects an instructor might miss (Bates et al., 2012).
• AI-Powered Feedback: Emerging AI capabilities can offer automated feedback on certain types of submissions (e.g., analyzing writing structure, checking code syntax, providing grammar suggestions), offering scalable feedback options.
• Performance-Based Feedback: In simulations or branching scenarios, the consequences of learner actions serve as implicit feedback on their decisions.
• Reflective Feedback: Prompts encouraging learners to self-assess their performance on an activity provide an internal feedback loop.
  ‍

The ability of the LMS to facilitate multiple types of timely and specific feedback is critical for guiding the active learning process and ensuring learners are effectively building skills and understanding.

Tracking and Measuring Active Engagement

Measuring the effectiveness of active learning requires going beyond simple completion tracking. An Active Learning LMS needs reporting capabilities that capture engagement with interactive elements (Strother et al., 2002):

• Tracking Interaction Data: Recording data points like choices made in branching scenarios, performance within simulations, contributions to discussion forums, completion of interactive exercises (Ruiz et al., 2006), and time spent on specific activities (not just overall course time).
• Analyzing Forum Participation: Metrics on the number of posts, replies, views, and potentially sentiment analysis of forum contributions.
• Peer Review Metrics: Tracking completion rates and potentially the quality scores of peer feedback provided and received.
• Assignment/Project Submissions: Clear tracking of submission status and associated grades or feedback.
• Skill Application Evidence: Capturing evidence of skill application through submitted projects, video recordings of practice sessions, or manager verifications prompted by the LMS.
• Correlation with Performance: Analyzing correlations between engagement in active learning modules and subsequent performance on assessments or, ideally, on-the-job performance metrics (if integrated).
• Qualitative Feedback Analysis: Systematically collecting and analyzing learner feedback specifically about the effectiveness and engagement levels of active learning components.

By tracking these richer data points, organizations can gain deeper insights into how learners are truly engaging with the material and whether the active learning strategies implemented via the LMS are achieving the desired outcomes in skill development and knowledge application.

Tip: Regularly analyze engagement data from active learning components (e.g., forum participation, scenario choices) alongside assessment scores to get a holistic view of learning effectiveness, not just knowledge recall.

Summary

An Active Learning LMS fundamentally reorients the focus of corporate learning technology from passive content delivery to active learner participation. By incorporating features that support interactivity, practice, application, collaboration, and reflection, these platforms create more engaging and effective learning experiences (Bondarouk et al., 2016). Contrasting sharply with passive models, active learning emphasizes doing, problem-solving, and peer interaction (Cheng et al., 2011). Core features include support for simulations (Vogel-Walcutt et al., 2011), branching scenarios (Richey et al., 2023), diverse assessments, collaboration tools, and robust feedback mechanisms (Sitzmann et al., 2011). The platform plays a crucial role in facilitating practice and application, leveraging social dynamics (Arbaugh et al., 2008), and providing timely feedback loops. Critically, an Active Learning LMS must also offer ways to track and measure engagement with these active elements, going beyond simple completion rates to assess true participation and skill development. By embracing active learning principles, organizations can leverage their LMS not just for training administration, but as a powerful engine for building competence and driving performance.