
Modern LMS
This article, about Modern LMS, includes the following chapters:
Modern LMS
Bibliography
Additional Information
The article is one in a series of dozens of articles included in our Corporate LMS Guide, a guide that provides the most detailed and updated information about Corporate LMS. For other articles in the series see:
The Full Guide to Corporate LMS
Note: We strive to help you understand and implement LMS (Learning Management System) solutions in the best possible way, based on up-to-date, research-based information. To achieve this, we have included references to reliable sources and practical examples from the business world in our articles. We regularly update the content to ensure its relevance and accuracy, but it is important to personally verify that the information is accurate and that its application fits your organization’s needs and goals. If you find an error in the article or are aware of a more updated and relevant source, we would be happy if you contacted us. Good luck on your journey to improving the learning experiences in your organization!
The term Modern LMS signifies a significant evolution beyond the traditional, often clunky, administration-focused Learning Management Systems of the past. It refers to contemporary platforms, such as MyQuest MLS platform, designed to meet the dynamic needs of today's workforce (Salas et al., 2012) and the strategic goals of forward-thinking organizations.
A Modern LMS is characterized not just by updated technology, but by a fundamental shift in philosophy towards learner-centricity, user experience (Park et al., 2009), data-driven insights, flexibility, and seamless integration into the broader digital workplace ecosystem. These platforms leverage cloud computing (Nguyen et al., 2023), AI, mobile accessibility, and sophisticated analytics to deliver personalized (Cheng et al., 2014), engaging, and impactful learning experiences that drive skills development and business performance, moving far beyond the simple course delivery and compliance tracking functions of their predecessors.
Defining the "Modern" in LMS
What truly distinguishes a Modern LMS goes beyond a recent software release date. It embodies a collection of characteristics reflecting current technological capabilities and contemporary approaches to learning and development.
Key defining traits include:
- Learner-Centric Design: Prioritizing the user experience (UX) for the learner, offering intuitive interfaces, personalized dashboards, easy content discovery, and seamless navigation.
- Cloud-Native Architecture: Predominantly built as Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) solutions, leveraging the scalability, flexibility, automatic updates, and reduced IT overhead of the cloud.
- Mobile-First Accessibility: Designed for seamless access and functionality across all devices, especially smartphones and tablets, often featuring dedicated mobile apps for optimal on-the-go learning (Liu et al., 2010).
- AI and Machine Learning Integration: Utilizing AI for personalized content recommendations, adaptive learning paths (Sharma et al., 2008), skills gap analysis, predictive analytics, and potentially chatbot support.
- Tip: Start leveraging AI by focusing on content recommendations based on job roles and completed courses; this offers immediate value and is often easier to implement than fully adaptive paths.
- Data-Driven Approach: Offering robust analytics and reporting capabilities that go beyond basic completions to provide insights into engagement, skill acquisition, learning effectiveness, and business impact.
- Focus on Skills: Incorporating features for defining, tracking, assessing, and developing specific skills and competencies aligned with organizational goals and internal mobility.
- Flexible Content Support: Easily handling a wide variety of content types beyond traditional SCORM packages, including videos, podcasts, articles, user-generated content, and resources aggregated from external sources (Dagger et al., 2007).
- Strong Integration Capabilities: Built with robust APIs and pre-built connectors to seamlessly integrate with other enterprise systems (HRIS, CRM, Skills Engines, Collaboration tools).
- Emphasis on Engagement: Incorporating elements like gamification (Silic et al., 2020), social learning features (forums, groups, peer feedback [Bates et al., 2012]), and blended learning support (Hrastinski et al., 2008; Hameed et al., 2008; Allen et al., 2007) to keep learners motivated (Al-Busaidi et al., 2012) and involved (Sitzmann, 2011b; Hameed et al., 2008).
- Agile and Continuously Improving: Developed using agile methodologies, allowing vendors to release frequent updates (Liaw et al., 2008) and improvements based on user feedback and market trends.
A Modern LMS is less a static repository and more a dynamic, intelligent, and integrated learning ecosystem.
Tip: When evaluating modern LMS options, prioritize platforms that demonstrate a clear roadmap for incorporating AI and skills-based features, ensuring the system will evolve alongside future L&D trends.
Cloud-Native Architecture (SaaS Dominance)
The foundation of nearly every Modern LMS is its cloud-native architecture, typically delivered via a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) model. This is a fundamental shift from older on-premises systems and provides numerous inherent advantages:
- Scalability and Elasticity: Cloud infrastructure allows the LMS to easily scale resources (users, storage, processing power) up or down based on demand, ensuring performance during peak times and cost-efficiency (Appana et al., 2008) during lulls (Nguyen et al., 2023).
- Automatic Updates and Maintenance: The vendor handles all software updates, patches, security fixes, and infrastructure maintenance, freeing the client organization's IT team and ensuring the platform is always up-to-date.
- Faster Deployment: Implementation is significantly quicker as there's no need to procure, install, or configure local server hardware or software.
- Reduced IT Burden: The need for internal IT resources to manage the LMS infrastructure is drastically reduced, lowering operational overhead.
- Accessibility: Users can access the LMS from anywhere with an internet connection via a web browser or mobile app, supporting remote work and global teams (Shurygin et al., 2021).
- Predictable Costs: Subscription-based pricing (OpEx) is generally more predictable than the large upfront investments (CapEx) and unpredictable maintenance costs associated with on-premises solutions.
- Access to Innovation: Cloud vendors continuously innovate and roll out new features and improvements, which become available to clients as part of their subscription.
- Reliability and Uptime: Reputable cloud providers offer high levels of uptime, redundancy, and disaster recovery capabilities (Webster et al., 1997), often backed by Service Level Agreements (SLAs).
This cloud-native approach provides the agility, accessibility, and efficiency required by contemporary businesses.
Emphasis on User Experience (UX) and Learner Centricity
Perhaps the most noticeable characteristic of a Modern LMS is its strong focus on the user experience (UX), particularly for the learner (Shurygin et al., 2021; Park et al., 2009). This contrasts sharply with older systems often designed primarily for administrative convenience.
Key aspects of this learner-centric UX include:
- Intuitive Interface: Clean, uncluttered designs that are easy to navigate, even for non-technical users. Clear calls to action and logical information architecture are paramount.
- Personalized Dashboards: Learners are greeted with dashboards relevant to them (Harun, 2002), showing assigned courses, progress, deadlines, recommendations, and achievements.
- Easy Content Discovery: Powerful search functionality, well-organized course catalogs, filtering options, and AI-driven recommendations help learners find relevant content quickly (Abaricia et al., 2023), supporting both assigned learning and self-directed exploration (Johnson et al., 2009).
- Tip: To significantly improve content discovery, establish and consistently apply a clear tagging strategy (by skill, topic, role) to all learning assets uploaded to the LMS.
- Engaging Course Player: Interfaces for consuming content are designed to be immersive and user-friendly, supporting various media types seamlessly and offering features like bookmarking, note-taking, and variable playback speed.
- Responsive Design: The interface adapts flawlessly to different screen sizes, providing a consistent experience on desktops, tablets, and smartphones.
- Minimal Friction: Reducing the number of clicks required to perform common tasks, simplifying workflows, and providing clear feedback mechanisms (Sitzmann et al., 2011).
- Visually Appealing Design: Utilizing modern aesthetics, appropriate use of visuals, and potentially custom branding to create a more inviting and engaging learning environment.
This focus on UX aims to make learning less of a chore and more of an integrated, accessible, and even enjoyable part of the employee experience, driving adoption and engagement (Chugh et al., 2018).
Tip: To enhance the learner experience, actively curate the main dashboard of your modern LMS to highlight timely announcements, relevant featured courses, and clear calls to action, reducing clutter and guiding users effectively.
Mobile-First Design and Accessibility
Recognizing that learning happens anywhere, anytime, Modern LMS platforms prioritize mobile access (Liu et al., 2010). This often involves more than just a responsive website; it embraces a mobile-first philosophy:
- Responsive Web Design: The core web interface is built to adapt fluidly to any screen size, ensuring baseline accessibility via mobile browsers.
- Dedicated Mobile Apps (iOS & Android): Many modern platforms offer native mobile apps that provide an optimized experience, potentially including features like:
- Offline content access (downloading courses for viewing without an internet connection).
- Push notifications for reminders, assignments, and announcements.
- Simplified navigation tailored for touchscreens.
- Access to device features like the camera for specific assignments.
- Cross-Device Consistency: Learning progress is seamlessly synced across devices, allowing a user to start a course on their desktop and continue later on their tablet (Ifenthaler et al., 2013) or phone.
- Optimized Content Delivery: Ensuring that content, especially video, streams efficiently and plays correctly on mobile devices with varying network conditions.
- Mobile-Friendly Assessments: Quizzes and tests are designed to be easily completed on smaller screens.
This mobile accessibility caters to the needs of remote workers, field employees, and learners who prefer the convenience of accessing training on their handheld devices, significantly expanding learning opportunities.
AI and Machine Learning Integration
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) are increasingly integral components of Modern LMS platforms, moving beyond basic automation to offer intelligent features:
- Personalized Learning Recommendations: AI algorithms analyze user profiles, job roles, learning history, skill gaps, and content metadata to suggest relevant courses and resources (Harun, 2002), similar to recommendation engines on consumer platforms like Netflix or Amazon.
- Adaptive Learning Paths: Based on pre-assessments or ongoing performance, AI can tailor the sequence and difficulty of learning modules to individual learner needs, optimizing the learning journey (Sharma et al., 2008).
- Skills Intelligence: AI can help identify skills gaps by analyzing job descriptions, performance data, and learning activity, then map relevant training content to those gaps. Some platforms use AI to automatically tag content with relevant skills.
- Chatbots and Virtual Assistants: AI-powered chatbots can provide learners with instant answers to common questions, help navigate the platform, or offer basic support, freeing up administrators (Elmashhara et al., 2023).
- Tip: When implementing an LMS chatbot, initially focus its knowledge base on answering common technical support and platform navigation questions to provide immediate relief to support teams.
- Predictive Analytics: ML models can analyze historical data to predict learners at risk of non-completion or identify trends in learning effectiveness, allowing for proactive interventions.
- Automated Content Curation: AI can assist administrators by suggesting relevant third-party content (Harun, 2002) to be included in the catalog based on defined topics or skills.
- Intelligent Assessment: AI can potentially be used for more sophisticated assessment analysis or even automated feedback generation on certain types of assignments.
AI integration transforms the LMS from a passive repository into a proactive, personalized learning partner.
Tip: Before fully relying on AI recommendations in your LMS, conduct pilot tests to evaluate the relevance and quality of suggestions for different user groups, and understand how the algorithms can be tuned.
Focus on Skills Development and Internal Mobility
Modern LMS platforms increasingly position themselves as strategic tools for talent development, with a strong focus on identifying, developing, and tracking skills:
- Skills Taxonomies/Frameworks: Ability to define or import a company-wide skills framework within the LMS.
- Content Tagging: Tools to tag courses and learning resources with specific skills they help develop. AI can sometimes automate this process.
- Skills Assessment: Integration or built-in tools to assess current employee skill levels (self-assessments, manager assessments, quizzes focused on skills).
- Tip: Combine skill self-assessments within the LMS with manager validation forms or performance-based quizzes for a more accurate picture of proficiency, rather than relying solely on self-ratings.
- Skill Gap Analysis: Reporting features that compare required skills for a role (or future role) with an employee's current assessed skills, highlighting gaps.
- Targeted Development Plans: Using skill gap data to automatically recommend or assign relevant learning paths and resources within the LMS to close those gaps.
- Career Pathing Support: Integrating skill development with internal career pathing tools, allowing employees to see what skills are needed for desired future roles and access the relevant training (Harun, 2002) via the LMS.
- Skills-Based Reporting: Analytics focused on skill acquisition (Bersin, 2007) and development across individuals, teams, or the organization.
This focus shifts the LMS from being purely about course completions to being a vital engine for upskilling, reskilling, and enabling internal talent mobility.
Learning Experience Platform (LXP) Convergence
The lines between traditional Learning Management Systems and Learning Experience Platforms (LXPs) are blurring, with many Modern LMS platforms incorporating LXP characteristics:
- Content Aggregation: Ability to pull in and curate content not just from the LMS's internal library but also from external sources like third-party libraries (LinkedIn Learning, Coursera), MOOCs, web articles, videos (YouTube, Vimeo), and internal knowledge bases.
- Learner-Driven Discovery: Emphasis on powerful search, personalized recommendations, and user-friendly interfaces that encourage learners to explore and discover content relevant to their interests and needs (Harun, 2002), beyond just assigned training.
- User-Generated Content: Features allowing employees to share their own knowledge and expertise by uploading content, drafting articles, or recommending resources, fostering peer-to-peer learning (Bates et al., 2012; Cheng et al., 2011).
- Social Learning Integration: Deeply embedded social features like activity feeds, forums, groups, expert finding, Q&A, and peer feedback mechanisms (Wang, 2011; Arbaugh et al., 2008).
- Focus on Engagement: Utilizing LXP principles to create a more engaging, consumer-grade experience that draws learners back to the platform voluntarily (Salas et al., 2001).
This convergence means modern platforms offer both the administrative rigor of an LMS (compliance, structured paths, reporting) and the engaging, personalized discovery experience of an LXP.
Data Analytics and Business Intelligence Integration
Modern LMS platforms provide sophisticated data analytics capabilities that extend far beyond basic completion reports, enabling organizations to measure learning impact and make data-informed decisions:
- Advanced Reporting: Tools for creating highly customized reports with granular filtering, multiple data dimensions, and various visualization options.
- Actionable Dashboards: Role-based dashboards presenting key metrics, trends, and actionable insights at a glance for learners, managers, and administrators.
- Engagement Metrics: Tracking data points like time spent, content access patterns, forum participation, frequency of logins, and feedback scores to understand how users interact with the platform and content.
- Learning Pathway Analytics: Analyzing the effectiveness of specific learning paths or sequences of courses.
- xAPI/LTI Integration: Support for modern learning standards like xAPI (Experience API) allows tracking of a wider range of learning experiences happening outside the formal LMS course structure, providing a more holistic view. LTI (Learning Tools Interoperability) facilitates seamless integration of external learning tools.
- BI Tool Integration: Exporting data or providing direct connectors (APIs) to integrate LMS data with dedicated Business Intelligence platforms (e.g., Power BI, Tableau, Qlik) for cross-functional analysis alongside other business data (e.g., sales, performance, HR metrics).
- Predictive Analytics: Utilizing historical data to forecast future trends, such as completion likelihood or potential skill gaps.
This focus on robust analytics allows L&D teams to demonstrate value, optimize programs, and align learning strategies with business objectives.
Tip: To make modern LMS analytics actionable, establish 3-5 key L&D performance indicators (KPIs) upfront and configure dashboards to track these specific metrics, focusing improvement efforts rather than getting lost in data.
Extensibility and Integration Ecosystem (APIs)
Recognizing that the LMS must function within a larger technology landscape, Modern LMS platforms are designed for extensibility and seamless integration:
- Robust APIs: Offering well-documented, comprehensive Application Programming Interfaces (primarily RESTful APIs) that allow developers to programmatically access data and functionality, enabling deep, custom integrations with other systems.
- Pre-Built Connectors: Providing a marketplace or library of pre-built integrations with common enterprise software, including:
- HRIS/HCM: For user provisioning, data sync, and potentially performance/talent management links.
- CRM: For sales, partner, and customer training use cases.
- SSO/Identity Providers: For seamless and secure authentication.
- Video Conferencing Tools: For VILT management.
- Content Libraries: For easy access to third-party courses.
- Collaboration Platforms: For notifications and embedded learning.
- Skills Engines/Platforms: For integrated skills management.
- Support for Standards: Adherence to interoperability standards like SCORM, AICC, xAPI, and LTI ensures compatibility with a wide range of authoring tools and external learning applications.
- Webhooks: Allowing the LMS to automatically push real-time notifications to other applications when specific events occur (e.g., course completion, new user registration).
- Developer Support: Providing resources, documentation, and potentially sandbox environments to assist developers in building custom integrations.
This focus on connectivity ensures the LMS can function as a central, integrated part of the organization's digital ecosystem, rather than a siloed application.
Tip: When considering pre-built connectors for your modern LMS, verify the depth of the integration (e.g., what specific data fields sync with HRIS, is it bi-directional?) rather than just confirming its existence, to ensure it meets your workflow needs.
Summary
A Modern LMS represents a paradigm shift in corporate learning technology, moving decisively away from the administrative focus of legacy systems. Defined by its cloud-native architecture, intuitive learner-centric user experience, and mobile-first accessibility, it leverages AI for personalization and skills intelligence. Modern platforms emphasize robust data analytics for measuring impact, seamless integration into the broader enterprise ecosystem via APIs, and often incorporate LXP features for enhanced content discovery and engagement. With a strong focus on skills development, agility, and continuous improvement driven by vendor innovation and user feedback, the Modern LMS serves not just as a tool for delivering training, but as a strategic platform for cultivating talent, driving performance, and adapting to the future of work.
- Abaricia, C. P., & Delos Santos, M. L. C. (2023). Enhancing e-learning systems through learning management system (LMS) technologies: Reshaping the learner experience. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12354.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12354 - Al‑Busaidi, K. A. (2012). Key factors to instructors’ satisfaction of learning management systems in blended learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24, 18–39.
https://www.academia.edu/124230645/Key_factors_to_instructors_satisfaction_of_learning_management_systems_in_blended_learning - Allen, E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Sloan Consortium.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529930.pdf - Appana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(1), 5–22.
https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22909/ - Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–21.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26520832_Does_the_Community_of_Inquiry_Framework_Predict_Outcomes_in_Online_MBA_Courses - Bates, R., Holton, E. F., & Hatala, J.-P. (2012). A revised learning transfer system inventory: Factorial replication and validation. Human Resource Development International, 15(5), 549–569.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-28225-004 - Bersin, J. (2007, January). Trends, areas of focus and predictions for 2007 [White paper]. Brandon Hall Group.
https://www.cedma-europe.org/newsletter%20articles/Brandon%20Hall/Bersin%20-%20Trends,%20Areas%20of%20Focus%20and%20Predictions%20for%202007%20(Jan%2007).pdf - Cheng, B., Wang, M., Mørch, A. I., Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (2014). Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 11, 56–72.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1747938X14 - Cheng, B., Wang, M., Yang, S. J., Kinshuk, & Peng, J. (2011). Acceptance of competency-based workplace e-learning systems: Effects of individual and peer learning support. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1317–1333.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131511000352 - Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U. (2018). Learning management systems in the workplace: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 189–197).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330475653_Learning_Management_Systems_in_the_Workplace_A_Literature_Review - Dagger, D., O’Connor, A., Lawless, S., Walsh, E., & Wade, V. (2007). Service-oriented eLearning platforms: From monolithic systems to flexible services. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1(4), 220–235.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4196172 - Elmashhara, M. G., De Cicco, R., Silva, S. C., Hammerschmidt, M., & Levi Silva, M. (2023). How gamifying AI shapes customer motivation, engagement, and purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 41(1), 134–150.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/mar.21912 - Hameed, S., Badii, A., & Cullen, A. J. (2008). Effective e-learning integration with traditional learning in a blended environment. In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228422212_Effective_E-Learning_Integration_with_Traditional_Learning_in_a_Blended_Learning_Environment - Harun, M. H. (2001). Integrating e-learning into the workplace. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3-4), 301-310.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751601000732 - Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educational Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55.
https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and-synchronous-elearning - Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of tablet PCs in corporate training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 1026–1033.
- Johnson, R. D., Gueutal, H., & Falbe, C. M. (2009). Technology, trainees, metacognitive activity and e-learning effectiveness. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(5), 353–364.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02683940910974125/full/html - Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131507001029 - Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m‑learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211–1219.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131510001508 - Nguyen, T. V., Pham, H. T., & Le, Q. N. (2023). E-Learning-Based Cloud Computing Environment: A Systematic Review, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Access, 11, 13045–13063.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/6287639/10380310/10341232.pdf - Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150–162.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.3.150 - Reams, J. (2024). The Quest for Leadership Using the Technology of MyQuest for Leader Development. Center for Transformative Leadership. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380169282 - Salas, E. and Cannon‐Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499.
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471 - Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101.
https://journals.sagepub.com/stoken/rbtfl/g8tvuLmoeZfN2/full - Sharma, R., Gupta, P., & Kumar, M. (2008). A framework for adaptive e-learning systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 112–119). IEEE.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4670262 - Shurygin, V., Saenko, N., Zekiy, A., Klochko, E., & Kulapov, M. (2021). Learning Management Systems in Academic and Corporate Distance Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(11), 121–139.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352134234_Learning_Management_Systems_in_Academic_and_Corporate_Distance_Education - Silic, M., & Lowry, P. B. (2020). Using design-science based gamification to improve organizational security training and compliance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(1), 129–161.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334960046_Using_Design-Science_Based_Gamification_to_Improve_Organizational_Security_Training_and_Compliance - Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 489–528.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01190.x - Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta‐analysis of self‐regulated learning in work‐related training and educational attainment. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 405–449.
https://europepmc.org/article/med/21401218 - Wang, M. (2011). Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(3), 191–205.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x - Webster, J., & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282–1309. https://www.jstor.org/stable/257034
Looking for an LMS?
MyQuest LMS is the best Learning Management System (LMS) platform for SMBs, training companies and online coaching. MyQuest LMS offers Action-Based Learning with Personalized Feedback for Optimal Skill Development (Reams, 2024). With our “Quest Builder,” you can easily create gamified training experiences structured around practical activities. Each activity is followed by personalized feedback from an expert, peers, or an AI assistant trained on your content.
Want to learn more about MyQuest LMS?
Further reading about MyQuest LMS:
- MyQuest LMS for Employee Training
- MyQuest LMS for Training companies
- MyQuest LMS for Customer Training
- MyQuest LMS Coaching Platform
- Myquest LMS for Non-Profit Organizations (NGOs)
- Myquest LMS Case Studies and Testimonials
Questions? Suggestions? Remarks?
Contact us at: info@myquest.co