
Best Online Corporate Learning Systems
This article, about Best Online Corporate Learning Systems, includes the following chapters:
Best Online Corporate Learning Systems
Bibliography
Additional Information
The article is one in a series of dozens of articles included in our Corporate LMS Guide, a guide that provides the most detailed and updated information about Corporate LMS. For other articles in the series see:
The Full Guide to Corporate LMS
Note: We strive to help you understand and implement LMS (Learning Management System) solutions in the best possible way, based on up-to-date, research-based information. To achieve this, we have included references to reliable sources and practical examples from the business world in our articles. We regularly update the content to ensure its relevance and accuracy, but it is important to personally verify that the information is accurate and that its application fits your organization’s needs and goals. If you find an error in the article or are aware of a more updated and relevant source, we would be happy if you contacted us. Good luck on your journey to improving the learning experiences in your organization!
Finding the best online corporate learning system requires careful evaluation of functionality, scalability, and user engagement features—particularly as organizations strive to keep pace with rapidly shifting workplace demands. Whether you’re looking to streamline compliance, support remote (Shurygin et al., 2021) and hybrid teams (Hameed et al., 2008), or foster a globally inclusive training ecosystem, the right solution should seamlessly integrate with your existing tools while offering robust security and data management.
This mini-article highlights essential criteria such as user-centric design, AI-driven personalization (Abaricia et al., 2023), and mobile-friendly approaches (Liu et al., 2010), demonstrating how these platforms can help businesses deliver impactful training programs that fuel workforce development and long-term success.
Key Criteria for Evaluating Online Corporate Learning Systems
A high-quality corporate learning system must balance robust functionality with user-centric design (Mohammadi et al., 2015). The system you choose should seamlessly integrate into daily operations, ensuring learners can access relevant content (Alonso et al., 2008) without friction.
Below are essential criteria that define a leading online corporate learning platform:
1. Ease of Use
- A clean, intuitive interface reduces the learning curve for both administrators and learners (Stephens et al., 2023; Lee et al., 2013).
- Tip: Ask vendors to demonstrate real-time learner and admin workflows during a trial—this helps you evaluate how intuitive the system feels across user types.
- Clear navigation paths and user-friendly dashboards encourage higher adoption rates (eLearning Journal, 2018; Brown et al., 2013).
2. Comprehensive Feature Set
- Look for content authoring tools, gamification elements (Sitzmann, 2011b), and robust reporting modules.
- Support for multimedia formats (videos, PDFs, interactive quizzes) caters to different learning preferences.
- Tip: Consider creating a content format checklist before implementation to ensure your current and future training materials are fully compatible with the LMS.
3. Security and Compliance
- Systems should comply with data protection standards like GDPR, SOC 2, or HIPAA, depending on your industry.
- Automated compliance workflows reduce the risk of non-compliance and streamline audits.
4. Integration Capabilities
- Pre-built connectors for HRIS, CRM, and other enterprise tools simplify user management and data synchronization.
- APIs or single sign-on (SSO) support reduce administrative overhead and enhance user experience.
- Tip: Test SSO functionality during your pilot phase to ensure seamless login experiences and prevent early user frustration.
5. Scalability and Reliability
- The platform should handle large user volumes and course libraries without performance bottlenecks.
- Tip: Simulate high-traffic scenarios with test users to assess how the system performs under load before committing to a long-term contract.
- Cloud-based solutions often offer more flexible scaling, with minimal downtime and easy feature updates (Nguyen et al., 2023).
By carefully evaluating these criteria, you ensure that your chosen platform aligns with both immediate training needs and long-term strategic objectives.
Different Types of Corporate Learning Systems
While the term “corporate learning system” is often used interchangeably with “LMS,” a variety of solutions exist, each catering to distinct organizational requirements. Understanding these system types can guide you toward the option that best fits your training priorities and user demographics.
Tip: Create a quick-reference comparison table that maps each system type (LMS, LXP, microlearning, etc.) to your organization’s top training use cases—it makes internal discussions and vendor evaluation easier.
Here are some common types of corporate learning systems:
- Traditional LMS
- Centralizes content distribution, tracking, and reporting.
- Often includes course authoring tools, assessments, and certification management.
- Learning Experience Platforms (LXPs)
- Emphasize user-driven content discovery, social learning, and AI-based recommendations.
- Encourage employees to explore courses based on interests, roles, or peer endorsements (Cheng et al., 2011).
- Microlearning Platforms
- Deliver short, focused modules optimized for mobile consumption.
- Particularly useful for quick skill refreshers or just-in-time learning scenarios (Díaz-Redondo et al., 2023).
- Virtual Classroom Solutions
- Provide real-time interactions via webinars, screen sharing, and collaborative tools.
- Ideal for synchronous training, workshops, or coaching sessions.
- Extended Enterprise Platforms
- Enable organizations to train partners, resellers, or customers alongside internal staff.
- Often includes eCommerce functionalities for selling courses externally.
Determining which category aligns with your goals—be it compliance, upskilling, or customer education—lays the foundation for a successful learning ecosystem.
Implementation and Adoption Strategies
Even the most feature-rich corporate learning system can falter without a well-executed implementation plan (Chugh et al., 2018). Ensuring user adoption requires clear communication, stakeholder buy-in (Ekuase-Anwansedo et al., 2021), and robust support structures (Selim et al., 2007).
Below are practical steps to guide a smooth rollout:
- Set Clear Objectives
- Define success metrics (e.g., completion rates, time-to-competency) and align them with business KPIs (Brown et al., 2013; Wang, 2011).
- Communicate these objectives to stakeholders for collective clarity.
- Stakeholder Involvement
- Engage department heads, IT teams, and L&D specialists early.
- Encourage feedback on features, reporting needs, and potential integration points.
- Pilot Testing
- Start with a small user group to identify technical issues or user interface challenges.
- Gather feedback on course design (Eom et al., 2018), navigation, and content relevance (Lee et al., 2013; Alonso et al., 2008) before a full-scale launch.
- Administrator and Trainer Training
- Provide in-depth tutorials or live demos for those managing the system—covering user enrollment, course creation, and analytics.
- Skilled administrators can adapt the platform to evolving needs and resolve minor issues quickly.
- Tip: Consider offering internal admin certifications or LMS power-user workshops to deepen platform expertise and reduce dependence on vendor support.
- User Onboarding and Support
- Offer self-help resources (Johnson et al., 2009) like FAQs, video guides, or in-app tooltips to reduce support tickets (Sitzmann et al., 2011).
- Establish helpdesk or chat support to handle queries swiftly and maintain learner confidence.
When executed carefully, these strategies maximize the platform’s effectiveness, driving higher user engagement and clearer training outcomes.
Boosting Engagement Through Gamification and Social Learning
Engagement is a pivotal factor in determining whether a corporate learning system truly benefits employees or becomes another unused platform. Gamification (Sitzmann, 2011b) and social learning features can significantly enhance user motivation (Silic et al., 2020), foster collaboration, and encourage a sense of community around learning (Arbaugh et al., 2008; Noe et al., 2014).
Here are methods to elevate engagement:
- Game Mechanics
- Incorporate points, badges, and leaderboards for course completions, quiz scores, or collaborative projects.
- Offer tangible or symbolic rewards (like e-certificates or recognition in team meetings) to celebrate achievements.
- Social Learning Tools
- Discussion boards, chat rooms, and peer reviews facilitate knowledge exchange (Cheng et al., 2011) and real-time feedback (Sitzmann et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011).
- Integrate social media-like feeds or user profiles to humanize the experience and spark friendly interaction.
- Tip: Encourage peer-to-peer engagement by spotlighting learner achievements in team newsletters or dashboards—this fosters a stronger learning culture.
- Challenges and Hackathons
- Create time-bound learning challenges that simulate real-world scenarios, encouraging problem-solving and teamwork (Bullen et al., 1998).
- Recognize top performers or creative solutions to drive ongoing participation.
- Live Workshops and Webinars
- Schedule interactive sessions where employees can engage with subject-matter experts or peers.
- Record these events for on-demand access, extending learning opportunities to those who missed the live version.
By weaving gamification and social elements into the learning process, you not only maintain employee interest but also promote deeper knowledge retention and practical skill application (Richey et al., 2023).
Measuring ROI and Impact in Online Corporate Learning
Demonstrating ROI is essential to justify the investment in any corporate learning system. While basic metrics like completion rates and user satisfaction provide insight, correlating training activities with tangible business outcomes can make the difference between a cost center and a strategic asset (Kirkpatrick et al., 2006).
Below are key approaches to measuring training impact:
- Align Training with Business Objectives
- Identify which organizational goals—be it reduced error rates, improved customer satisfaction, or faster onboarding—each course aims to support (Harun, 2002).
- Evaluate performance changes against these targets post-training (Govindasamy et al., 2001).
- Utilize Analytics Dashboards
- Leverage built-in LMS reports or external BI tools to visualize user progress, quiz performance, and skill gap trends.
- Filter data by department, location, or role to uncover specific improvement areas.
- Kirkpatrick’s Model (Kirkpatrick et al., 2006)
- Level 1 (Reaction): Gauge learner satisfaction via surveys or rating scales.
- Level 2 (Learning): Assess knowledge retention through quizzes or practical assignments.
- Level 3 (Behavior): Monitor how training alters on-the-job performance.
- Level 4 (Results): Correlate changes in behavior with overall business metrics, such as revenue growth or quality improvements.
- Long-Term Tracking
- Compare historical data (pre-LMS vs. post-LMS) to see how skill gaps, productivity, or compliance outcomes evolve over time.
- Tip: Schedule quarterly performance reviews using LMS data to demonstrate progress and inform continuous improvement strategies.
- Revisit metrics quarterly or annually, refining course content and user journeys as needed.
- Compare historical data (pre-LMS vs. post-LMS) to see how skill gaps, productivity, or compliance outcomes evolve over time.
By consistently analyzing training data and linking it to organizational performance, you solidify the learning system’s role as a driver of continuous improvement.
Security and Compliance Considerations
As organizations increasingly adopt cloud-based (Ekuase-Anwansedo et al., 2021) or remote training solutions, data security and compliance become paramount. A robust corporate learning system should safeguard sensitive employee information and ensure that all content distribution adheres to relevant regulations.
Below are areas to address:
- Data Protection
- Confirm that data—both in transit and at rest—is encrypted using industry-standard protocols (e.g., SSL/TLS, AES-256).
- Check for role-based access controls to limit who can view or modify user data.
- Regulatory Compliance
- Evaluate whether the LMS meets standards like GDPR (EU data privacy), HIPAA (healthcare), or SOC 2 (security, availability, confidentiality).
- Automatic compliance tracking can simplify audits and reduce legal risks.
- Single Sign-On (SSO) and MFA
- Implementing SSO and multi-factor authentication (MFA) adds layers of protection against unauthorized access.
- Centralized identity management also streamlines user provisioning and deactivation.
- Audit Trails
- Comprehensive logs record actions like course updates, user enrollments, or role changes.
- These logs can prove invaluable in investigating breaches or demonstrating compliance during audits.
By incorporating security measures and compliance features, you not only protect employees and proprietary data but also build trust in the system’s integrity.
Adapting Corporate Learning Systems for Global Teams
For multinational organizations, the global reach of a learning system can determine its overall effectiveness. A platform that supports multiple languages, cultural nuances, and time zones allows employees worldwide to access relevant content without feeling marginalized.
Below are strategies for global learning:
- Multi-Language Support
- Translate course materials and user interfaces, ensuring that critical training resources are accessible to non-English speakers.
- Localize date formats, currency symbols, and cultural references where applicable.
- Localized Content
- Tailor modules to regional regulations, customer preferences, or workplace norms.
- Collaborate with local managers to confirm cultural accuracy and relevance.
- 24/7 Support and Training
- Provide round-the-clock help desk services or chatbots, so remote teams can resolve issues promptly.
- Store recorded webinars or tutorials for employees in different time zones to watch on demand.
- Time Zone Management
- Schedule live training sessions with rotating time slots or offer asynchronous alternatives (Hrastinski et al., 2008).
- Tip: Consider creating regional learning calendars to ensure inclusivity across global teams—this helps maximize participation in live events.
- Automated calendar invites should adjust session times to each user’s local time zone.
- Schedule live training sessions with rotating time slots or offer asynchronous alternatives (Hrastinski et al., 2008).
By proactively addressing the challenges of global deployment, you ensure that every employee, regardless of location, receives a consistent and inclusive learning experience.
The Future of Online Corporate Learning
Rapid technological advances continue to reshape how organizations approach workforce development. Emerging trends like AI-driven content creation (Elmashhara et al., 2023), augmented and virtual reality, and advanced analytics promise deeper personalization and more immersive learning experiences.
Below are key developments on the horizon:
- Immersive Technologies (AR/VR)
- Simulations and virtual labs can replicate complex real-world tasks without risk, accelerating skill mastery.
- Particularly useful in fields like manufacturing, healthcare, or engineering.
- Micro-Credentials and Digital Badges
- Employees earn digital certificates or badges for specific competencies, fostering a sense of achievement and career progression.
- Tip: Promote earned badges on employee intranet or team dashboards to increase motivation and give visibility to learning achievements.
- These credentials can be shared on professional networks or integrated into HR systems (Bondarouk et al., 2016) for performance evaluations.
- Employees earn digital certificates or badges for specific competencies, fostering a sense of achievement and career progression.
- AI-Driven Personalization
- More advanced AI will refine user journeys, suggesting hyper-specific content or recommending peer mentors (Abaricia et al., 2023).
- Natural language processing (NLP) could facilitate real-time Q&A (Elmashhara et al., 2023), enabling “virtual tutor” capabilities.
- Social and Collaborative Tools
- Deeper integration with social platforms or enterprise communication tools will blur the line between formal training and informal knowledge sharing (García-Peñalvo et al., 2015).
- Real-time co-authoring or group brainstorming fosters innovation and problem-solving skills (Noe et al., 2014; Bullen et al., 1998).
Staying informed about these evolving trends helps you select or adapt an LMS that remains competitive and responsive to your organization’s changing learning needs.
Comparing Cloud-Based vs. On-Premises Learning Systems
Choosing between cloud-based and on-premises learning systems hinges on factors such as scalability, security, and budgetary constraints (Nguyen et al., 2023). While cloud-based solutions generally offer quick deployment, automatic updates, and minimal IT overhead (Ekuase-Anwansedo et al., 2021), on-premises platforms provide greater control over data hosting, customization, and compliance management.
Organizations must balance these pros and cons in light of their long-term growth plans and specific regulatory requirements. By carefully evaluating infrastructure capabilities, projected user volumes, and data governance needs, you can determine which deployment model most effectively supports your training objectives.
Below are key points to consider when comparing these two approaches:
- Scalability and Maintenance: Cloud solutions scale more easily to accommodate user spikes or additional features; on-premises may require hardware upgrades and in-house expertise for system maintenance.
- Cost Structure: Subscription-based cloud models often spread costs over time, whereas on-premises solutions may involve larger upfront investments but lower recurring fees.
- Security and Compliance: On-premises can grant deeper control over security protocols, but reputable cloud vendors also maintain strict compliance with standards like GDPR or SOC 2.
- Updates and Upgrades: Cloud vendors typically handle patches and new releases automatically; on-premises systems rely on internal teams to schedule and implement updates.
- Tip: Request a vendor’s release roadmap during demos—frequent feature updates may indicate active innovation, while infrequent changes may suggest platform stagnation.
- Integration and API Access: Both models can integrate with existing enterprise tools, though cloud platforms often provide more streamlined API-based connections.
LMS Features for Remote and Hybrid Work Environments
As organizations adopt remote and hybrid work models (Hameed et al., 2008), LMS platforms must evolve to accommodate distributed teams and flexible schedules (Shurygin et al., 2021). Features that facilitate synchronous and asynchronous learning (Hrastinski et al., 2008), real-time collaboration, and robust content management are crucial.
Effective LMS solutions cater to employees who alternate between office-based tasks and remote responsibilities, ensuring uninterrupted access (Webster et al., 1997) to training resources regardless of location. By focusing on user engagement, seamless integrations, and strong support for mobile devices (Liu et al., 2010), organizations can create an inclusive learning ecosystem that addresses the challenges of modern work arrangements (Chugh et al., 2018).
Below are LMS features that effectively serve remote and hybrid teams:
- Virtual Classrooms and Webinars: Real-time video conferencing, breakout rooms, and chat functions replicate the interactivity of in-person training sessions.
- Asynchronous Learning Modules: Self-paced courses (Johnson et al., 2009), recorded lectures, and downloadable content let employees learn at their own pace (Sitzmann et al., 2011; Hrastinski et al., 2008).
- Offline Access: Ensuring learners can download materials or modules in advance reduces dependence on continuous internet connections.
- Collaboration Tools: Discussion forums (Kang et al., 2013), group projects, and peer reviews encourage team-based problem-solving (Bullen et al., 1998) and knowledge exchange (Noe et al., 2014).
- Tip: Encourage managers to assign team-based learning projects using collaboration tools—this increases application of skills in real work scenarios.
- Time Zone Management: Automated scheduling that adjusts session times to each user’s local zone fosters global participation.
Mobile-First vs. Desktop-First: Which Approach Suits Your Workforce?
Deciding between a mobile-first or desktop-first design approach for your LMS depends on learner demographics, job roles, and the nature of your training content. A mobile-first LMS emphasizes quick, on-the-go access through responsive interfaces and bite-sized modules (Liu et al., 2010), making it ideal for remote employees, field technicians, or sales representatives who often work away from traditional office settings.
Conversely, a desktop-first system may be more appropriate for employees who need in-depth modules, complex simulations, or advanced analytics—features that can benefit from larger screens and more powerful hardware. By matching your workforce’s day-to-day workflows with the appropriate interface, you ensure maximum adoption and efficient knowledge transfer (Mohammadi et al., 2015).
Below are considerations for choosing between mobile-first and desktop-first:
- Work Environment: Employees frequently in the field or traveling might prefer mobile-first, while office-based staff may lean toward desktop interfaces.
- Content Complexity: Detailed simulations, multi-step assessments, or large documents may be easier to navigate on a desktop.
- Bandwidth and Connectivity: Mobile-first solutions often optimize for variable network conditions, offering offline modes for unreliable connections.
- User Experience (UX): Mobile-first designs prioritize simplified navigation and quick interactions; desktop-first platforms can accommodate more intricate dashboards and analytics tools.
- Device Policies: Organizations with bring-your-own-device (BYOD) programs might find mobile-first more appealing, whereas desktop-first can integrate seamlessly with corporate IT infrastructure.
Ensuring Accessibility and Inclusivity in Online Corporate Training
Fostering an accessible and inclusive learning environment goes beyond legal obligations; it enhances learner engagement and demonstrates your organization’s commitment to diversity. An accessible LMS ensures that individuals with visual, auditory, cognitive, or motor impairments can participate fully, while inclusivity measures also address language barriers and cultural nuances. By integrating accessible design principles (Salas et al., 2012) and inclusive content strategies, you create a platform where every employee, regardless of background or ability, can excel in their professional development.
Below are practical steps to ensure accessibility and inclusivity in corporate training:
- WCAG Compliance: Conform to guidelines such as WCAG 2.1, focusing on text alternatives for images, keyboard navigation, and color contrast standards.
- Multi-Language Support: Translate user interfaces, course materials, and notifications into multiple languages, adapting cultural references where necessary.
- Screen Reader Compatibility: Structure content with headings, labels, and alt text, ensuring learners using screen readers can navigate effectively.
- Captioned and Transcribed Media: Provide subtitles or transcripts for videos, podcasts, or webinars, assisting those with hearing impairments or language challenges.
- Tip: Use auto-captioning tools to streamline transcript creation, but always review them manually for accuracy before publishing training content.
- Inclusive Content Creation: Incorporate diverse examples, case studies, and scenarios that reflect a wide range of cultural and social contexts.
Summary
From assessing ease of use and comprehensive features to ensuring data protection and global scalability, today’s online corporate learning systems can transform employee development into a strategic advantage. By understanding the different types of learning solutions—traditional LMS, LXP, microlearning, virtual classrooms, and extended enterprise—organizations can tailor their training initiatives to various audiences and objectives. Coupled with strong implementation tactics, gamification and social learning elements, and a data-driven approach to measuring ROI, these platforms go beyond mere content delivery.
Ultimately, the best online corporate learning systems are those that adapt to evolving business needs, promote meaningful learner engagement, and integrate seamlessly into a culture of continuous improvement.
- Abaricia, C. P., & Delos Santos, M. L. C. (2023). Enhancing e-learning systems through learning management system (LMS) technologies: Reshaping the learner experience. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12354.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12354 - Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2008). Learning objects, learning objectives and learning design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 389–400.
https://oa.upm.es/2424/1/INVE_MEM_2008_55924.pdf - Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–21.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26520832_Does_the_Community_of_Inquiry_Framework_Predict_Outcomes_in_Online_MBA_Courses - Bondarouk, T., Parry, E., & Furtmueller, E. (2016). Electronic HRM: four decades of research on adoption and consequences. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 98–131.
https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/29089220/Bondarouk2017electronic.pdf - Brown, K. G. and Charlier S.D. (2013). An integrative model of e-learning use: Leveraging theory to understand and increase usage. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 37–49.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053482212000472 - Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1–32.
https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/140 - Cheng, B., Wang, M., Yang, S. J., Kinshuk, & Peng, J. (2011). Acceptance of competency-based workplace e-learning systems: Effects of individual and peer learning support. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1317–1333.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131511000352 - Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U. (2018). Learning management systems in the workplace: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 189–197).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330475653_Learning_Management_Systems_in_the_Workplace_A_Literature_Review - Díaz-Redondo, R. P., Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., López-Escobar, J. J., & Fernández-Vilas, A. (2023). Integrating micro-learning content in traditional e-learning platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06500.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06500 - Ekuase-Anwansedo, A., & Smith, A. (2021). Effect of cloud-based learning management systems on the implementation process: Faculty and student perspectives.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10522 - eLearning Journal. (2018). LMS are still popular – but will their use remain stable in the future? eLearning Journal.
https://www.elearning-journal.com/en/2018/10/10/LMS-are-still-popular/ - Elmashhara, M. G., De Cicco, R., Silva, S. C., Hammerschmidt, M., & Levi Silva, M. (2023). How gamifying AI shapes customer motivation, engagement, and purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 41(1), 134–150.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/mar.21912 - Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. (2018). A system’s view of e-learning success model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 16(1), 42-76.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322783738_A_System's_View_of_E-Learning_Success_Model - García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Seoane Pardo, A. M. (2015). An updated review of the concept of eLearning. Tenth anniversary. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 16(1), 119–144.
https://doaj.org/article/80224f0585ed4779bfa0df4885e74450 - Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3–4), 287–299.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751601000719 - Hameed, S., Badii, A., & Cullen, A. J. (2008). Effective e-learning integration with traditional learning in a blended environment. In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228422212_Effective_E-Learning_Integration_with_Traditional_Learning_in_a_Blended_Learning_Environment - Harun, M. H. (2001). Integrating e-learning into the workplace. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3-4), 301-310.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751601000732 - Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educational Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55.
https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and-synchronous-elearning - Johnson, R. D., Gueutal, H., & Falbe, C. M. (2009). Technology, trainees, metacognitive activity and e-learning effectiveness. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(5), 353–364.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02683940910974125/full/html - Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner–instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 292–301.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcal.12005 - Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
https://bkconnection.com/static/Evaluating_Training_Programs_EXCERPT.pdf - Lee, Y., Hsieh, Y. C., & Chen, Y. H. (2013). An investigation of employees’ use of e-learning systems: Applying the technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 173–189.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144929X.2011.577190 - Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m‑learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211–1219.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131510001508 - Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359–374. (Posted revision 2018).
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563214003225 - Nguyen, T. V., Pham, H. T., & Le, Q. N. (2023). E-Learning-Based Cloud Computing Environment: A Systematic Review, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Access, 11, 13045–13063.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/6287639/10380310/10341232.pdf - Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014). Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 245–275.
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321 - Reams, J. (2024). The Quest for Leadership Using the Technology of MyQuest for Leader Development. Center for Transformative Leadership. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380169282 - Richey, J. E., & Misiolek, N. (2023). Gamification and soft skills assessment in the development of a serious game. JMIR Serious Games, 11(1), e45436.
https://games.jmir.org/2023/1/e45436/ - Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101.
https://journals.sagepub.com/stoken/rbtfl/g8tvuLmoeZfN2/full - Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396–413.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131505001338 - Shurygin, V., Saenko, N., Zekiy, A., Klochko, E., & Kulapov, M. (2021). Learning Management Systems in Academic and Corporate Distance Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(11), 121–139.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352134234_Learning_Management_Systems_in_Academic_and_Corporate_Distance_Education - Silic, M., & Lowry, P. B. (2020). Using design-science based gamification to improve organizational security training and compliance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(1), 129–161.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334960046_Using_Design-Science_Based_Gamification_to_Improve_Organizational_Security_Training_and_Compliance - Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 489–528.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01190.x - Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta‐analysis of self‐regulated learning in work‐related training and educational attainment. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 405–449.
https://europepmc.org/article/med/21401218 - Stephens, C. C. (2023). Employees’ acceptance of learning management system e-learning influence over organizational security training (Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest LLC).
https://www.proquest.com/openview/6010c6536deb8f380f370ccb72c39ce9/1 - Wang, M. (2011). Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(3), 191–205.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x - Webster, J., & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282–1309. https://www.jstor.org/stable/257034
Looking for an LMS?
MyQuest LMS is the best Learning Management System (LMS) platform for SMBs, training companies and online coaching. MyQuest LMS offers Action-Based Learning with Personalized Feedback for Optimal Skill Development (Reams, 2024). With our “Quest Builder,” you can easily create gamified training experiences structured around practical activities. Each activity is followed by personalized feedback from an expert, peers, or an AI assistant trained on your content.
Want to learn more about MyQuest LMS?
Further reading about MyQuest LMS:
- MyQuest LMS for Employee Training
- MyQuest LMS for Training companies
- MyQuest LMS for Customer Training
- MyQuest LMS Coaching Platform
- Myquest LMS for Non-Profit Organizations (NGOs)
- Myquest LMS Case Studies and Testimonials
Questions? Suggestions? Remarks?
Contact us at: info@myquest.co