
Best LMS for Corporate Training?
This article, about the Best LMS for Corporate Training, includes the following chapters:
Best LMS for Corporate Training?
Bibliography
Additional Information
The article is one in a series of dozens of articles included in our Corporate LMS Guide, a guide that provides the most detailed and updated information about Corporate LMS. For other articles in the series see:
The Full Guide to Corporate LMS
Note: We strive to help you understand and implement LMS (Learning Management System) solutions in the best possible way, based on up-to-date, research-based information. To achieve this, we have included references to reliable sources and practical examples from the business world in our articles. We regularly update the content to ensure its relevance and accuracy, but it is important to personally verify that the information is accurate and that its application fits your organization’s needs and goals. If you find an error in the article or are aware of a more updated and relevant source, we would be happy if you contacted us. Good luck on your journey to improving the learning experiences in your organization!
Selecting the best LMS for corporate training can significantly impact how effectively your organization develops employee skills (Salas et al., 2012), complies with regulations, and maintains a continuous learning culture. Today’s LMS market offers a variety of feature sets, pricing structures, and integration capabilities (360iResearch, 2025) — ranging from robust enterprise systems to more agile, user-friendly platforms (eLearning Journal, 2018).
In this mini-article, we examine the foundational attributes of top-tier corporate LMS solutions, explore how they can address diverse training objectives (such as onboarding, compliance (Sung et al., 2019), and leadership development), and provide insights into successful rollout strategies (Eom et al., 2018). By evaluating factors like scalability, learner engagement, and real-world ROI, you can make an informed choice that boosts both workforce productivity and long-term organizational success (Kirkpatrick et al., 2006).
Key Features of the Best LMS for Corporate Training
The most effective corporate LMS platforms share a set of foundational features designed to streamline content delivery, enhance learner engagement, and simplify administrative tasks. From user management to analytics, these core capabilities shape how well the system integrates into your organizational framework.
Below are essential features that define a high-quality LMS for corporate training:
User and Role Management
- Granular permission levels allow admins to control who can create courses, manage users, or access sensitive reports.
- Single sign-on (SSO) and user directory synchronization reduce administrative overhead.
Robust Content Delivery
- The best LMS supports multiple content formats—videos, PDFs, SCORM packages, and interactive modules (Strother et al., 2002) —catering to diverse learning styles.
- Adaptive learning paths guide employees through material relevant to their roles or skill gaps (Sharma et al., 2008).
- Tip: When evaluating LMS features, involve both end users and administrators in hands-on demos—this helps ensure the platform is intuitive for all user levels and avoids adoption challenges later (Mohammadi et al., 2015).
Assessment and Certification
- Built-in quizzes, exams, and certification management track knowledge retention and validate competency.
- Automated notifications remind learners to renew certifications before they expire.
Reporting and Analytics
- Comprehensive dashboards display metrics like completion rates, quiz scores, and user engagement trends.
- Advanced analytics can pinpoint knowledge gaps, predict performance risks, and justify training ROI.
Mobile Learning Capabilities
- A responsive design or dedicated mobile app allows learners to access courses anytime, anywhere (Liu et al., 2010).
- Offline functionality ensures employees can progress even without a stable internet connection.
Tailoring the LMS to Different Corporate Training Needs
Corporate training spans a wide range of objectives, from onboarding new hires to certifying employees in compliance-critical fields (Sung et al., 2019). An LMS that excels in one domain may lack crucial functionalities in another, so understanding your training priorities helps you select a platform that truly meets your requirements.
Below are common corporate training scenarios and the LMS features that best support them:
1. Onboarding and Orientation
- Automated course enrollment for new hires streamlines the onboarding process.
- Gamified introductions to company culture, policies, and roles accelerate time-to-competency.
2. Compliance and Certification
- Detailed audit trails, automatic recertification reminders, and advanced reporting are vital in regulated industries like finance or healthcare.
- Integrations with HR systems (Bondarouk et al., 2016) ensure that certifications remain up to date as employees shift roles or departments.
3. Skill Development and Upskilling
- AI-driven course recommendations guide learners to material aligned with their career goals or skill gaps.
- Social learning tools—like discussion forums (Kang et al., 2013) or peer assessments—encourage knowledge exchange and collaboration (Noe et al., 2014).
4. Leadership and Soft Skills
- Interactive simulations (Ruiz et al., 2006), scenario-based learning (Roffe et al., 2002), and feedback loops (Sitzmann et al., 2011) can help develop communication, negotiation, and leadership abilities (Reams, 2024).
- Mentorship features or live coaching sessions facilitate deeper skill refinement.
5. Extended Enterprise Training
- If you train partners, clients, or franchisees, look for multi-tenant options and eCommerce capabilities.
- Custom branding for external audiences fosters a cohesive brand identity.
By mapping these scenarios to your LMS requirements, you ensure the platform you choose supports the specific types of training critical to your business success.
Tip: Create a matrix that maps training goals (e.g., onboarding, compliance, leadership) to the LMS features required—this visual tool helps simplify platform comparisons during vendor selection.
Ensuring Scalability and Compliance in Corporate Training
As organizations grow, so do their training needs—both in terms of user volume and the complexity of regulatory requirements. An LMS that can’t keep pace with your expansion or address stringent compliance standards will quickly become a liability.
Below are the key considerations for scalability and compliance:
High User Volume Support
- Check if the LMS can handle thousands of concurrent logins, large course libraries, and frequent content updates (Liaw et al., 2008) without performance lags.
- Cloud-based solutions often scale more efficiently, adjusting server capacity on demand (Ekuase-Anwansedo et al., 2021).
- Tip: Ask LMS vendors to provide real-world examples or case studies demonstrating how their platform handled compliance audits or scaled during rapid organizational growth — proof of performance often matters more than spec sheets.
Automated Compliance Workflows
- Systems that track certification deadlines, log training histories, and generate compliance reports reduce the risk of non-compliance.
- Integration with compliance databases can automatically flag upcoming regulatory changes or new certification requirements.
Global Data Hosting and Security
- For multinational enterprises, data sovereignty and local hosting might be mandatory.
- Compliance with GDPR, SOC 2, HIPAA, or other relevant standards ensures legal and ethical handling of personal information.
Version Control and Audit Trails
- A record of course updates, user enrollments, and content revisions can prove invaluable during audits.
- Automated logs reduce manual record-keeping and minimize errors.
When an LMS scales effectively and automates compliance workflows, it allows your training initiatives to expand seamlessly alongside your organizational footprint, all while safeguarding critical data.
Fostering Engagement: Gamification and Social Learning
Even the most feature-rich LMS can fall short if employees don’t feel motivated to learn. Gamification (Sitzmann, 2011b) and social learning elements have emerged as powerful tools to boost engagement (Richey et al., 2023; Sung et al., 2019), encouraging learners to interact with course material and each other.
Below are strategies to foster engagement through gamification and social learning:
Points, Badges, and Leaderboards
- Awarding points for completing modules or passing quizzes taps into employees’ competitive spirit.
- Badges and leaderboards publicly recognize achievements, spurring friendly rivalry and consistent participation.
- Tip: Try running a short, gamified challenge — like a leaderboard competition or a badge-earning sprint—during your pilot phase to test employee response and engagement levels before full rollout.
Community-Driven Discussions
- Discussion forums (Kang et al., 2013), group assignments, and peer reviews facilitate collaborative problem-solving (Bullen et al., 1998) and knowledge sharing.
- Social features can mimic familiar social media interfaces, lowering the barrier to participation.
Live Webinars and Virtual Classrooms
- Synchronous sessions allow real-time interaction, Q&A, and immediate feedback (Zhang et al., 2004).
- Recorded sessions serve as on-demand resources for employees who missed the live event.
Mentorship and Coaching
- Pairing learners with internal experts or external coaches fosters deeper skill development and accountability.
- Automated scheduling and chat features keep mentors and mentees connected throughout the training cycle.
Incorporating these elements transforms the LMS from a static content repository into a dynamic learning community, driving higher completion rates and a richer, more interactive learning experience (Strother et al., 2002).
Implementation Best Practices: Rolling Out a Corporate LMS
Even the best LMS won’t yield strong results if rolled out haphazardly. A strategic implementation plan is crucial for ensuring that employees understand the platform’s value and are equipped to navigate it effectively (Chugh et al., 2018).
Below are practical steps for a successful LMS launch:
1. Stakeholder Alignment
- Involve L&D teams, IT staff, and departmental managers early to gather input and foster a sense of shared ownership.
- Define clear roles and responsibilities, ensuring each stakeholder knows their part in the rollout process.
2. Pilot Phase
- Start small, introducing the LMS to a single department or user group.
- Gather feedback on navigation, course relevance (Lee et al., 2013), and potential technical issues before organization-wide deployment.
3. Admin and Trainer Training
- Equip admins with in-depth platform knowledge, including reporting, user management, and troubleshooting.
- Provide trainers or instructional designers with resources for creating interactive, engaging content.
4. User Onboarding and Support
- Develop clear documentation, video tutorials, or in-platform help sections that address common user questions.
- Offer help desk support via email, chat, or phone to rapidly resolve login issues or content-related queries.
5. Change Management and Communication
- Announce the LMS rollout via company-wide emails, internal newsletters, or team meetings.
- Highlight the platform’s benefits—like career development, skill-building (Salas et al., 2012), or compliance readiness—to boost enthusiasm.
A well-orchestrated implementation phase lays the foundation for high user adoption, effective knowledge transfer, and measurable ROI.
Measuring ROI and Impact in Corporate Training
Proving the ROI of your LMS investment is vital for securing ongoing budget support and demonstrating the value of training initiatives. While completion rates and user feedback offer some insights, a more holistic approach involves correlating training outcomes with business metrics (Eom et al., 2018).
Below are methods for assessing ROI and impact:
- Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation (Kirkpatrick et al., 2006)
- Level 1: Reaction (learner satisfaction)
- Level 2: Learning (knowledge or skill acquisition)
- Level 3: Behavior (on-the-job application)
- Level 4: Results (impact on business goals, like revenue or customer satisfaction)
- Business KPIs
- Monitor metrics like reduced error rates, faster onboarding times, or higher sales conversions to link training to tangible benefits.
- Survey managers on observed performance improvements post-training (Wang, 2011).
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Calculate direct training costs (licensing, content development, trainer fees) against benefits such as lower turnover, increased productivity, or avoided regulatory fines.
- Factor in intangible gains like morale and brand reputation.
- Longitudinal Tracking
- Compare pre- and post-LMS implementation data over multiple quarters or years to spot trends and measure sustainability.
- Ongoing measurement allows you to refine content, user permissions, or integration strategies for even better outcomes.
Demonstrating ROI solidifies the LMS’s strategic importance, aligning training initiatives with broader corporate objectives and ensuring continued investment in employee development.
AI-Enhanced Content Curation and Automated Learning Paths
In modern corporate training environments, AI-enhanced content curation and automated learning paths enable organizations to deliver highly personalized experiences at scale. Rather than relying on static course catalogs, AI algorithms analyze learner data—such as performance metrics, skill gaps, and job roles—to suggest the most relevant content. This dynamic approach keeps employees engaged (Littlejohn et al., 2014) and ensures they’re developing the competencies that align with both personal growth and organizational objectives. Additionally, automated learning paths allow for continuous adjustments: as learners progress or encounter difficulties, the system adapts by introducing new modules or reinforcing key concepts.
Below are key benefits and considerations for AI-driven content curation and automated learning paths:
- Personalized Recommendations: Intelligent systems propose courses and resources tailored to each learner’s interests, role requirements, or performance indicators.
- Adaptive Difficulty: Learners who struggle with specific topics receive supplementary material, while advanced users are challenged with higher-level content (Sharma et al., 2008).
- Real-Time Insights: Automated dashboards highlight emerging skill gaps or areas of strength, empowering L&D teams to fine-tune training strategies.
- Scalability: AI curation handles large user bases and vast content libraries without overburdening administrators.
- Privacy and Ethics: Ensure data collection complies with relevant regulations (GDPR, HIPAA) and that AI algorithms remain transparent and bias-free.
Transitioning from Traditional Classroom Training to a Digital LMS
Shifting from traditional classroom-based training to a digital LMS requires strategic planning, clear communication, and a keen focus on change management. While in-person sessions offer immediacy and direct engagement (Salas et al., 2001), digital platforms expand reach, reduce travel costs (Appana et al., 2008), and provide flexible (Wasilik & Bolliger, 2009), on-demand learning (Zhang et al., 2004). Organizations must therefore balance the benefits of technology—such as automation, tracking, and personalized pathways—with the potential need for human interaction and mentorship. Properly managed, this transition not only modernizes training delivery but also supports continuous skill development (Salas et al., 2012) across diverse, geographically distributed teams.
Below are key steps to ensure a smooth transition:
- Stakeholder Buy-In: Involve department heads, IT staff, and trainers early to address concerns and gather feedback on digital needs (Ekuase-Anwansedo et al., 2021).
- Pilot and Feedback: Test the LMS with a small user group to identify usability issues and refine course content.
- Content Digitization: Convert existing classroom materials into interactive modules, quizzes, or video lessons suited for online delivery (Strother et al., 2002).
- Change Management: Communicate the advantages of digital learning—such as flexibility(Wasilik & Bolliger, 2009), real-time analytics (Bersin, 2007), and reduced scheduling conflicts—to encourage acceptance.
- Support and Resources: Provide help documentation, video tutorials, or live Q&A sessions for both learners and admins to foster confidence in the new system.
Maximizing Learner Engagement with Microlearning and Mobile Apps
In a fast-paced corporate environment, microlearning and mobile apps have become game-changers for maintaining learner engagement and ensuring consistent skill development. By breaking down content into short, focused modules, microlearning allows employees to absorb information in manageable chunks — ideal for reinforcing key concepts or fitting training around busy schedules (Díaz-Redondo et al., 2023). Meanwhile, dedicated mobile apps cater to a remote or on-the-go workforce (Shurygin et al., 2021), enabling seamless course access and real-time progress tracking (Liu et al., 2010). Together, these methods foster higher completion rates and reduce cognitive overload, ultimately making learning more efficient and enjoyable (Ibáñez et al., 2014).
Below are strategies for successful microlearning and mobile learning initiatives:
- Bite-Sized Content: Each lesson or activity should take only a few minutes to complete, boosting retention and motivation (Díaz-Redondo et al., 2023).
- Push Notifications: Timely reminders or updates help learners stay on track without overwhelming them.
- Interactive Elements: Quizzes, polls, and scenario-based tasks (Roffe et al., 2002) enhance engagement and reinforce knowledge (Strother et al., 2002).
- Offline Access: Mobile apps that store lessons locally allow learners to continue training without a constant internet connection.
- Data Analytics: Monitoring user activity and performance through mobile analytics helps L&D teams tailor content and measure ROI (Alonso et al., 2008).
Blended Learning: Combining Online Courses with In-Person Sessions
Blended learning merges the convenience of digital coursework with the interactive benefits of face-to-face instruction (Allen et al., 2007), offering a comprehensive approach to corporate training . By assigning foundational material or self-paced modules online (Sitzmann et al., 2011), employees can learn core concepts at their own pace (Johnson et al., 2009), freeing up in-person sessions for hands-on activities, group discussions, or coaching. This format leverages technology to ensure consistent knowledge transfer while preserving the personal engagement of classroom environments (Salas et al., 2001). As a result, employees often report higher retention rates (Noe et al., 2014), stronger peer connections, and deeper understanding of subject matter (Al-Busaidi et al., 2012).
Below are the best practices for implementing blended learning in corporate settings:
- Pre-Work Assignments: Encourage learners to complete eLearning modules or quizzes before attending live workshops, establishing baseline knowledge.
- Interactive Classroom Activities: Use in-person sessions for role-playing exercises, team problem-solving, or Q&A discussions, enhancing practical application (Ruiz et al., 2006).
- Digital Follow-Ups: After face-to-face events, assign refresher courses, peer evaluations, or surveys to sustain momentum and reinforce lessons.
- Progress Tracking: Consolidate data from both online and offline activities into a unified LMS dashboard for a holistic view of learner progress.
- Flexible Scheduling: Offer multiple time slots or self-paced online segments (Johnson et al., 2009) so employees can balance training with daily responsibilities (Sitzmann et al., 2011).
Summary
From user and role management to AI-enhanced learning paths, the most effective corporate LMS solutions balance comprehensive functionality with a user-centric design. By tailoring the platform to your unique training scenarios—whether onboarding, upskilling, or blended learning (Al-Busaidi et al., 2012) — you ensure that each course remains both relevant and engaging. Equally important are implementation best practices: securing stakeholder buy-in, conducting pilot phases, and measuring impact through analytics (Bersin, 2007).
Ultimately, the best LMS for corporate training does more than deliver content—it fosters a culture of continuous improvement, supports global scalability and compliance needs, and helps demonstrate clear returns on your investment in employee development.
Tip: Revisit your LMS evaluation annually, using real data on engagement, compliance, and training outcomes—this ensures your platform remains aligned with evolving business goals and learner needs.
- 360iResearch. (2025). Global corporate learning management system market by organization size, industry vertical, deployment mode, end-user type, and delivery platform.
Retrieved February 9, 2025, from: https://www.360iresearch.com/library/intelligence/corporate-learning-management-system - Al‑Busaidi, K. A. (2012). Key factors to instructors’ satisfaction of learning management systems in blended learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24, 18–39.
https://www.academia.edu/124230645/Key_factors_to_instructors_satisfaction_of_learning_management_systems_in_blended_learning - Allen, E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Sloan Consortium.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529930.pdf - Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2008). Learning objects, learning objectives and learning design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 389–400.
https://oa.upm.es/2424/1/INVE_MEM_2008_55924.pdf - Appana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(1), 5–22.
https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22909/ - Bersin, J. (2007, January). Trends, areas of focus and predictions for 2007 [White paper]. Brandon Hall Group.
https://www.cedma-europe.org/newsletter%20articles/Brandon%20Hall/Bersin%20-%20Trends,%20Areas%20of%20Focus%20and%20Predictions%20for%202007%20(Jan%2007).pdf - Bondarouk, T., Parry, E., & Furtmueller, E. (2016). Electronic HRM: four decades of research on adoption and consequences. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 98–131.
https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/29089220/Bondarouk2017electronic.pdf - Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1–32.
https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/140 - Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U. (2018). Learning management systems in the workplace: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 189–197).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330475653_Learning_Management_Systems_in_the_Workplace_A_Literature_Review - Díaz-Redondo, R. P., Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., López-Escobar, J. J., & Fernández-Vilas, A. (2023). Integrating micro-learning content in traditional e-learning platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06500.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06500 - Ekuase-Anwansedo, A., & Smith, A. (2021). Effect of cloud-based learning management systems on the implementation process: Faculty and student perspectives.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10522 - eLearning Journal. (2018). LMS are still popular – but will their use remain stable in the future? eLearning Journal.
https://www.elearning-journal.com/en/2018/10/10/LMS-are-still-popular/ - Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. (2018). A system’s view of e-learning success model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 16(1), 42-76.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322783738_A_System's_View_of_E-Learning_Success_Model - Ibáñez, M. B., Di-Serio, Á., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014). Gamification for engaging computer science students in learning activities: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(3), 291–301.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6827214 - Johnson, R. D., Gueutal, H., & Falbe, C. M. (2009). Technology, trainees, metacognitive activity and e-learning effectiveness. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(5), 353–364.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02683940910974125/full/html - Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner–instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 292–301.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcal.12005 - Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
https://bkconnection.com/static/Evaluating_Training_Programs_EXCERPT.pdf - Lee, Y., Hsieh, Y. C., & Chen, Y. H. (2013). An investigation of employees’ use of e-learning systems: Applying the technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 173–189.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144929X.2011.577190 - Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131507001029 - Littlejohn, Allison and Margaryan, Anoush (2014). Technology-enhanced Professional Learning. In: Billet, Stephen; Harteis, Christian and Gruber, Hans eds. International Handbook on Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1187–1212.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x - Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m‑learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211–1219.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131510001508 - Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359–374. (Posted revision 2018).
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563214003225 - Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014). Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 245–275.
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321 - Reams, J. (2024). The Quest for Leadership Using the Technology of MyQuest for Leader Development. Center for Transformative Leadership. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380169282 - Richey, J. E., & Misiolek, N. (2023). Gamification and soft skills assessment in the development of a serious game. JMIR Serious Games, 11(1), e45436.
https://games.jmir.org/2023/1/e45436/ - Roffe, I. (2002). E-learning: engagement, enhancement and execution. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(1), 40–50.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09684880210416102/full/html - Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 81(3), 207–212.
https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/abstract/2006/03000/the_impact_of_e_learning_in_medical_education.2.aspx - Salas, E. and Cannon‐Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499.
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471 - Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101.
https://journals.sagepub.com/stoken/rbtfl/g8tvuLmoeZfN2/full - Sharma, R., Gupta, P., & Kumar, M. (2008). A framework for adaptive e-learning systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 112–119). IEEE.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4670262 - Shurygin, V., Saenko, N., Zekiy, A., Klochko, E., & Kulapov, M. (2021). Learning Management Systems in Academic and Corporate Distance Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(11), 121–139.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352134234_Learning_Management_Systems_in_Academic_and_Corporate_Distance_Education - Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 489–528.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01190.x - Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta‐analysis of self‐regulated learning in work‐related training and educational attainment. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 405–449.
https://europepmc.org/article/med/21401218 - Strother, J. (2002). An assessment of the effectiveness of e-learning in corporate training programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1–17.
https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/83 - Sung, M., & Lee, D. (2019). Compliance training in corporate e-learning: A gamification approach. Computers & Education, 134, 50–61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.006
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131519301507 - Wang, M. (2011). Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(3), 191–205.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x - Wasilik, O., & Bolliger, D. U. (2009). Faculty satisfaction in the online environment: An institutional study. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 173–178.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751609000190 - Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr., J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75–79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200465318_can_E-learning_Replace_Classroom_Learning
Looking for an LMS?
MyQuest LMS is the best Learning Management System (LMS) platform for SMBs, training companies and online coaching. MyQuest LMS offers Action-Based Learning with Personalized Feedback for Optimal Skill Development (Reams, 2024). With our “Quest Builder,” you can easily create gamified training experiences structured around practical activities. Each activity is followed by personalized feedback from an expert, peers, or an AI assistant trained on your content.
Want to learn more about MyQuest LMS?
Further reading about MyQuest LMS:
- MyQuest LMS for Employee Training
- MyQuest LMS for Training companies
- MyQuest LMS for Customer Training
- MyQuest LMS Coaching Platform
- Myquest LMS for Non-Profit Organizations (NGOs)
- Myquest LMS Case Studies and Testimonials
Questions? Suggestions? Remarks?
Contact us at: info@myquest.co