Leadership Training LMS

Leadership Training LMS

by Ari Manor
|
Jun 03, 2025

This article, about Leadership Training LMS, includes the following chapters:

Leadership Training LMS

Bibliography

Additional Information

The article is one in a series of dozens of articles included in our Corporate LMS Guide, a guide that provides the most detailed and updated information about Corporate LMS. For other articles in the series see:

The Full Guide to Corporate LMS

Note: We strive to help you understand and implement LMS (Learning Management System) solutions in the best possible way, based on up-to-date, research-based information. To achieve this, we have included references to reliable sources and practical examples from the business world in our articles. We regularly update the content to ensure its relevance and accuracy, but it is important to personally verify that the information is accurate and that its application fits your organization’s needs and goals. If you find an error in the article or are aware of a more updated and relevant source, we would be happy if you contacted us. Good luck on your journey to improving the learning experiences in your organization!

Leadership Training LMS

A Leadership Training LMS is a specific configuration and application of a Learning Management System focused on developing the essential competencies, skills, and perspectives required for effective leadership within an organization. Distinct from general employee training platforms, a leadership training LMS supports the unique needs of cultivating current and future leaders—from first-line supervisors to senior executives. It provides a structured environment for delivering targeted curricula, facilitating complex skill development (like strategic thinking and emotional intelligence), managing blended learning approaches (Hameed et al., 2008) including coaching and mentoring, tracking progress against leadership competency models, and ultimately supporting succession planning and building a robust leadership pipeline.

LMS Leadership Development

LMS Leadership Development refers to the strategic use of a Learning Management System to design, deliver, manage, and measure programs aimed at cultivating leadership capabilities across an organization. It leverages the LMS platform's features to provide scalable, consistent, and trackable learning experiences tailored to the specific competencies required at different leadership levels. This involves more than just hosting courses; it encompasses creating structured learning paths (Salas et al., 2012), integrating diverse learning modalities (e.g., e-learning, virtual instructor-led training, assessments, coaching, mentoring), mapping content to leadership competency frameworks, and analyzing data to gauge program effectiveness and identify high-potential individuals. The goal is to use the LMS as a central tool to systematically grow the organization's leadership talent pool.

Defining Leadership Training Needs in the Modern Workplace

Before leveraging an LMS, organizations must clearly define the leadership competencies needed to navigate today's complex and dynamic business environment. Modern leadership requires a blend of traditional management skills and newer capabilities focused on agility, empathy, and digital fluency. Identifying these needs is the first step in designing effective LMS-based training.

Common modern leadership training needs include:

  • Strategic Thinking and Vision: Ability to analyze trends, anticipate future challenges and opportunities, set a clear direction, and align team efforts with organizational goals.
  • Change Management and Adaptability: Leading teams effectively through organizational changes, fostering resilience, and adapting strategies in response to shifting market conditions.
  • Emotional Intelligence (EQ): Understanding and managing one's own emotions and recognizing and influencing the emotions of others; essential for effective communication, conflict resolution, and team motivation.
  • Communication and Influence: Articulating ideas clearly (Kang et al., 2013), listening actively, providing constructive feedback, inspiring action, and building consensus across diverse stakeholders.
  • Coaching and Mentoring: Developing team members through effective coaching techniques, providing guidance, and fostering a culture of continuous learning and growth (Newton et al., 2003).
  • Data Literacy and Digital Acumen: Understanding how to interpret data, leverage technology for decision-making, and lead teams in an increasingly digital landscape.
  • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Leadership: Creating inclusive team environments, championing diversity initiatives, and leading equitably.
  • Remote and Hybrid Team Management: Effectively leading, engaging, and managing performance for teams working across different locations and schedules (Shurygin et al., 2021).
  • Decision-Making and Problem-Solving: Utilizing critical thinking and analytical skills to make sound judgments and effectively address complex challenges.
  • Well-being and Resilience: Supporting team well-being, managing stress, and fostering personal and team resilience.

Understanding these specific needs allows organizations to curate or create relevant content (Harun, 2002) and structure appropriate learning paths within the LMS.

Tip: Prioritize these leadership needs based on current business challenges and strategic goals. Focus initial LMS content development or curation efforts on the top 2-3 critical competencies for maximum impact.

Key LMS Features Supporting Leadership Development Programs

LMS platforms designed to effectively support leadership training often emphasize features that accommodate complex skill development (Noe et al., 2014), blended learning approaches (Hrastinski et al., 2008), personalized paths (Cheng et al., 2014), and integration with broader talent management processes.

Essential LMS features for leadership development include:

  • Blended Learning Support: Robust capabilities to manage and track various learning modalities within a single program (Al-Busaidi et al., 2012), including self-paced e-learning, virtual instructor-led training (VILT) scheduling and tracking via web conferencing integration, assignments, offline activities, and coaching/mentoring sessions.
  • Competency Management and Skills Mapping: Ability to define leadership competencies, map specific courses and activities to those competencies, and track individual progress against required proficiency levels.
  • Personalized Learning Paths: Functionality to create tailored development journeys based on leadership level (e.g., emerging leader, mid-level manager, senior executive), assessment results, or individual development plans (IDPs).
  • Assessment Variety (Beyond Quizzes): Support for diverse assessment methods suitable for leadership skills, such as 360-degree feedback tools (or integrations), scenario-based simulations (Richey et al., 2023), video assessment tools (for practicing communication/presentation skills), and project-based assignments.
  • Social Learning and Collaboration Tools: Integrated discussion forums (Bullen et al., 1998), communities of practice, peer feedback mechanisms (Wang, 2011), and expert directories to facilitate knowledge sharing, networking, and collaborative problem-solving among leaders (Roffe et al., 2002).
  • Mentoring Program Management: Features to help facilitate formal or informal mentoring relationships, including matching mentors and mentees, scheduling sessions, and tracking engagement.
  • Integration with HRIS and Talent Management Systems: Seamless connection with HR systems for user data and with performance management or succession planning modules to link learning directly to career progression and talent strategy.
  • Advanced Reporting and Analytics: Dashboards and reports capable of tracking progress against competency models, identifying high-potentials based on learning engagement and performance, and analyzing the overall impact of leadership programs.

These features provide the necessary infrastructure to manage the multifaceted nature of leadership development. At myQuest, our LMS platform already incorporates many of these features, and is regarded one of the top platforms in the space of leadership development based on it’s real-time feedback, social learning, and mentorship capabilities. Read this case study to learn more about how myQuest transforms organizations and helps to implement strong leadership skills.

Tip: When evaluating LMS platforms for leadership training, heavily weight features supporting blended learning (VILT integration, assignment tracking) and competency mapping. These are often more critical for leadership development than basic course delivery.

Structuring Leadership Curricula and Learning Paths in an LMS

Effective leadership development requires more than just a collection of courses; it needs structure. An LMS allows organizations to design deliberate curricula and learning paths that guide leaders progressively through required knowledge and skill development.

Strategies for structuring leadership training in an LMS:

  • Tiered Programs: Creating distinct learning paths for different leadership levels (e.g., Aspiring Leaders, New Managers, Experienced Leaders, Executive Leadership) with increasing complexity and strategic focus.
  • Competency-Based Structure: Organizing curricula around core leadership competencies identified by the organization, with modules and activities specifically designed to build proficiency in each area.
  • Modular Design: Breaking down broad topics (like "Strategic Planning" or "Change Management") into smaller, focused modules that can be combined flexibly into different learning paths.
  • Defined Sequences and Prerequisites: Establishing a logical flow for learning, ensuring foundational concepts are covered before advancing to more complex topics.
  • Incorporating Diverse Activities: Building paths that mix e-learning modules, required readings, VILT sessions, practical assignments (e.g., developing a team charter), coaching check-ins, and peer discussions.
  • Milestones and Certifications: Defining key milestones within a path and potentially awarding internal certifications upon completion of specific levels or programs.
  • Elective Options: Providing a selection of optional courses or resources within a learning path to allow for personalization based on individual interests or specific development needs.
  • Linking to Performance Goals: Aligning learning path components with individual development plans (IDPs) or organizational performance objectives.

A well-structured curriculum within the LMS provides clarity, direction, and a measurable framework for leadership growth.

Tip: Incorporate "Action Learning Projects" directly into your LMS learning paths, requiring leaders to apply learned concepts to real business problems. This bridges the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application, making training more impactful.

Blending Learning Approaches for Leadership Training via LMS

Leadership development rarely succeeds through purely online, self-paced learning. Complex skills like influence, strategic thinking, and coaching benefit significantly from a blended approach that combines digital learning with interactive (Zhang et al., 2004), human-centric elements, all managed and tracked through the LMS (Hrastinski et al., 2008).

Common blended learning components managed via LMS:

  • Self-Paced E-Learning Modules: Foundational knowledge delivery, introduction to concepts, pre-work for live sessions (managed and tracked in LMS).
  • Virtual Instructor-Led Training (VILT): Live, interactive online sessions facilitated via integrated web conferencing tools (e.g., Zoom, Teams). The LMS handles scheduling, enrollment, attendance tracking, and hosting recordings. Used for discussions, group activities, expert Q&A.
  • Assignments and Action Learning Projects: Practical tasks assigned through the LMS where leaders apply concepts to real-world work challenges (e.g., analyzing team performance data, creating a communication plan). Submissions and feedback can be managed in the LMS.
  • Coaching Sessions: Scheduling and potentially tracking the occurrence of one-on-one coaching sessions (either internal managers or external coaches) as part of a formal development program within the LMS.
  • Mentoring Relationships: Using LMS tools to facilitate mentor matching, goal setting (Sitzmann et al., 2011), and tracking engagement in formal mentoring programs.
  • Peer Learning Groups / Cohorts: Organizing participants into cohorts within the LMS to foster discussion (Bullen et al., 1998), collaborative problem-solving (Roffe et al., 2002), and peer accountability through forums or group projects.
  • 360-Degree Feedback and Assessments: Integrating or managing the process of collecting multi-rater feedback, often used as input for personalized development planning within the LMS framework.
  • Simulations and Case Studies: Using interactive simulations or detailed case studies (delivered via LMS) to allow leaders to practice decision-making in realistic scenarios (Zhang et al., 2004).

The LMS acts as the orchestrator, bringing these diverse elements together into a cohesive and measurable development journey.

Developing Soft Skills (Communication, EQ, Strategy) via LMS

While technical skills can often be taught straightforwardly online, developing complex leadership soft skills requires more nuanced approaches within the LMS. The platform must support activities that encourage practice, reflection, and feedback (Salas et al., 2001).

LMS strategies for soft skill development:

  • Scenario-Based Learning: Presenting realistic leadership dilemmas (e.g., handling team conflict, delivering difficult feedback, making a strategic trade-off) and requiring learners to choose responses or outline approaches. Feedback can be automated or instructor-provided (Sitzmann et al., 2011).
  • Video Assessment Tools: Enabling leaders to record themselves practicing presentations, coaching conversations, or feedback delivery. These videos can be submitted via the LMS for peer or manager review using structured rubrics.
  • Interactive Video: Using video content with embedded questions or decision points to engage learners actively and prompt reflection on communication styles or emotional responses.
  • Curated Content: Providing access to high-quality articles, videos (e.g., TED Talks), book summaries, and frameworks related to EQ, communication models, or strategic analysis techniques.
  • Self-Reflection Journals/Assignments: Prompting leaders to reflect on their experiences and apply concepts through guided journaling exercises submitted or tracked via the LMS.
  • Discussion Forums for Peer Feedback: Creating safe spaces within the LMS for leaders to share challenges, discuss approaches, and provide constructive feedback (Wang, 2011) to peers on soft skill application (Bullen et al., 1998).
  • Linking to Coaching/Mentoring: Integrating soft skill development goals directly with coaching or mentoring relationships managed through the LMS.

The LMS provides the structure and tools to facilitate practice and feedback loops essential for soft skill growth (Sitzmann et al., 2011).

Using LMS for Succession Planning and High-Potential Identification

A Leadership Training LMS can be a valuable tool within a broader succession planning strategy by helping to identify, develop, and track high-potential employees (HiPos) being groomed for future leadership roles.

How the LMS supports succession planning:

  • Identifying Engagement: Tracking which employees actively engage in voluntary leadership development courses or consistently perform well in assigned leadership training.
  • Tracking Competency Development: Monitoring progress against leadership competency models for individuals identified as high-potentials.
  • Managing HiPo Programs: Using dedicated learning paths and communities within the LMS specifically for cohorts of high-potential employees.
  • Providing Visibility: Giving talent management teams and senior leaders visibility into the development progress of potential successors through LMS reporting.
  • Skill Gap Analysis: Using assessment data from the LMS to identify development gaps in potential successors and assign targeted training.
  • Assigning Stretch Assignments/Projects: While the work happens outside the LMS, the platform can track the assignment and related learning components for HiPos.
  • Facilitating Cross-Functional Exposure: Using the LMS to deliver foundational knowledge required for potential cross-functional moves as part of a development plan.

By centralizing development data, the LMS provides valuable input for informed succession planning decisions.

Tip: Create a specific, private group or learning path within the LMS dedicated to your identified High-Potential (HiPo) cohort. Use it to deliver targeted development, track progress closely, and facilitate exclusive networking opportunities.

Measuring the Effectiveness of LMS-Based Leadership Training

Measuring the impact of leadership training is notoriously challenging but crucial. An LMS provides data points that, when combined with other business metrics and qualitative feedback, can help assess effectiveness.

Measurement approaches using LMS data:

  • Program Completion Rates: Tracking completion of assigned leadership curricula and learning paths.
  • Assessment Scores: Measuring knowledge acquisition on core leadership concepts (though less indicative of behavioral change).
  • Competency Improvement: Tracking progress against defined leadership competencies over time, based on assessments or integrated 360-feedback results.
  • Engagement Metrics: Monitoring participation in discussions, VILT sessions, mentoring activities, and voluntary learning.
  • Learner Feedback (Kirkpatrick Level 1): Collecting satisfaction and perceived relevance (Sun et al., 2008) data through surveys within the LMS (Kirkpatrick et al., 2006).
  • Application Tracking (Kirkpatrick Level 3 - often requires integration/manager input): Assessing observed changes in on-the-job leadership behaviors, potentially through manager feedback forms integrated with the LMS or performance reviews informed by LMS data.
  • Business Impact (Kirkpatrick Level 4 - requires correlation): Analyzing potential correlations between leadership training participation/performance and key business metrics like team engagement scores, employee retention rates within trained leaders' teams, project success rates, or achievement of departmental goals.

While LMS data alone isn't sufficient, it provides essential quantitative inputs for evaluating program reach, knowledge gain, and potential behavioral shifts.

Tip: Supplement LMS analytics with qualitative data by scheduling brief follow-up interviews or focus groups with participants and their managers 3-6 months post-training. Ask for specific examples of behavioral changes to get a richer picture of training effectiveness beyond completion rates.

Summary

A Leadership Training LMS is a strategic platform tailored to the unique requirements of developing organizational leaders. It moves beyond simple course delivery to support complex, blended learning journeys focused on critical competencies like strategic thinking, emotional intelligence, and change management (LMS Leadership Development). Key features include robust blended learning support (Hameed et al., 2008), competency mapping, personalized paths (Cheng et al., 2014), diverse assessment tools, and integration with talent management systems. By structuring curricula, facilitating soft skill development (Noe et al., 2014) through interactive methods (Ruiz et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2004), and providing valuable data for measurement and succession planning, the LMS becomes a central pillar in building a capable, resilient, and future-ready leadership pipeline. Measuring success requires analyzing LMS data alongside performance metrics and qualitative feedback (Salas et al., 2001) to understand the true impact on leadership behavior and organizational outcomes.

Bibliography
  1. Al‑Busaidi, K. A. (2012). Key factors to instructors’ satisfaction of learning management systems in blended learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24, 18–39.
    https://www.academia.edu/124230645/Key_factors_to_instructors_satisfaction_of_learning_management_systems_in_blended_learning
  2. Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2008). Learning objects, learning objectives and learning design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 389–400.
    https://oa.upm.es/2424/1/INVE_MEM_2008_55924.pdf
  3. Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1–32.
    https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/140
  4. Cheng, B., Wang, M., Mørch, A. I., Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (2014). Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 11, 56–72.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1747938X14
  5. Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3–4), 287–299.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751601000719
  6. Hameed, S., Badii, A., & Cullen, A. J. (2008). Effective e-learning integration with traditional learning in a blended environment. In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228422212_Effective_E-Learning_Integration_with_Traditional_Learning_in_a_Blended_Learning_Environment 
  7. Harun, M. H. (2001). Integrating e-learning into the workplace. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3-4), 301-310.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751601000732
  8. Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educational Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55.
    https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and-synchronous-elearning
  9. Ibáñez, M. B., Di-Serio, Á., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014). Gamification for engaging computer science students in learning activities: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(3), 291–301.
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6827214
  10. Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner–instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 292–301.
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcal.12005
  11. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
    https://bkconnection.com/static/Evaluating_Training_Programs_EXCERPT.pdf
  12. Newton, R. (2003). Staff attitudes to the development and delivery of e-learning. New Library World, Vol. 104 No. 10, pp. 412-425.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03074800310504357
  13. Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014). Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 245–275.
    https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321
  14. Reams, J. (2024). The Quest for Leadership Using the Technology of MyQuest for Leader Development. Center for Transformative Leadership. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380169282
  15. Richey, J. E., & Misiolek, N. (2023). Gamification and soft skills assessment in the development of a serious game. JMIR Serious Games, 11(1), e45436.
    https://games.jmir.org/2023/1/e45436/
  16. Roffe, I. (2002). E-learning: engagement, enhancement and execution. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(1), 40–50.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09684880210416102/full/html
  17. Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 81(3), 207–212.
    https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/abstract/2006/03000/the_impact_of_e_learning_in_medical_education.2.aspx 
  18. Salas, E. and Cannon‐Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499.
    https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471
  19. Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101.
    https://journals.sagepub.com/stoken/rbtfl/g8tvuLmoeZfN2/full
  20. Shurygin, V., Saenko, N., Zekiy, A., Klochko, E., & Kulapov, M. (2021). Learning Management Systems in Academic and Corporate Distance Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(11), 121–139.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352134234_Learning_Management_Systems_in_Academic_and_Corporate_Distance_Education
  21. Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta‐analysis of self‐regulated learning in work‐related training and educational attainment. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 405–449.
    https://europepmc.org/article/med/21401218
  22. Strother, J. (2002). An assessment of the effectiveness of e-learning in corporate training programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1–17.
    https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/83
  23. Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131506001874
  24. Tennyson, R. D. (2010). Historical reflection on learning theories and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 93–95.
    https://www.cedtech.net/download/historical-reflection-on-learning-theories-and-instructional-design-5958.pdf
  25. Wang, M. (2011). Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(3), 191–205.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
  26. Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr., J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75–79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200465318_can_E-learning_Replace_Classroom_Learning
Additional Information

Looking for an LMS?

MyQuest LMS is the best Learning Management System (LMS) platform for SMBs, training companies and online coaching. MyQuest LMS offers Action-Based Learning with Personalized Feedback for Optimal Skill Development (Reams, 2024). With our “Quest Builder,” you can easily create gamified training experiences structured around practical activities. Each activity is followed by personalized feedback from an expert, peers, or an AI assistant trained on your content.

Want to learn more about MyQuest LMS?

Further reading about MyQuest LMS:

Questions? Suggestions? Remarks?

Contact us at: info@myquest.co