
Skill Building Training LMS
This article, about Skill Building Training LMS, includes the following chapters:
Skill Building Training LMS
Bibliography
Additional Information
The article is one in a series of dozens of articles included in our Corporate LMS Guide, a guide that provides the most detailed and updated information about Corporate LMS. For other articles in the series see:
The Full Guide to Corporate LMS
Note: We strive to help you understand and implement LMS (Learning Management System) solutions in the best possible way, based on up-to-date, research-based information. To achieve this, we have included references to reliable sources and practical examples from the business world in our articles. We regularly update the content to ensure its relevance and accuracy, but it is important to personally verify that the information is accurate and that its application fits your organization’s needs and goals. If you find an error in the article or are aware of a more updated and relevant source, we would be happy if you contacted us. Good luck on your journey to improving the learning experiences in your organization!
A Skill Building Training LMS refers to a Learning Management System specifically optimized and utilized for the purpose of developing tangible, applicable skills within a workforce, moving beyond simple knowledge dissemination. While knowledge is foundational, a skill-building focus emphasizes the practical application, practice, feedback (Sitzmann et al., 2011), and validation needed to translate understanding into competence. This type of LMS deployment leverages features that support hands-on practice, performance measurement, targeted feedback, and tracking of skill progression against defined competency frameworks, ultimately aiming to measurably improve employees' abilities to perform specific tasks or exhibit desired behaviors critical for their roles and organizational success.
Defining Skill Building in the Context of LMS
Skill building, when facilitated through an LMS, transcends traditional e-learning focused solely on information transfer. It implies a structured approach within the platform aimed at enabling learners to acquire, practice, refine, and demonstrate specific capabilities or competencies (Salas et al., 2012). This involves not just understanding what to do, but learning how to do it effectively and consistently.
Key elements defining LMS-based skill building include:
- Focus on Application: The primary goal is for learners to be able to apply knowledge and perform specific tasks or behaviors successfully.
- Practice Opportunities: Integrating activities within or alongside the LMS that allow learners to practice the skill in a safe environment (e.g., simulations, scenario-based exercises [Richey et al., 2023], role-plays).
- Feedback Mechanisms: Incorporating ways for learners to receive constructive feedback on their practice attempts (Salas et al., 2001), either from peers, managers, instructors, or even AI-driven tools.
- Performance Measurement: Utilizing assessments that evaluate skill application rather than just knowledge recall (e.g., performance-based tasks, observations, simulation scoring).
- Iterative Improvement: Structuring learning experiences that allow for repeated practice and refinement based on feedback (Sitzmann et al., 2011).
- Contextual Relevance: Designing training that links skill development directly to real-world job tasks and challenges (Lee et al., 2013; Harun, 2002).
An LMS focused on skill building acts as an orchestrator for these elements, creating a pathway from knowledge to demonstrable competence.
Key LMS Features for Effective Skill Development
To effectively support skill building, an LMS needs features that go beyond standard content delivery and tracking (Noe et al., 2014). Certain functionalities are crucial for enabling the practice, feedback, and assessment required for genuine skill acquisition.
Essential LMS features for skill development include:
- Support for Interactive Content and Simulations: Compatibility with authoring tools that create sophisticated simulations, branching scenarios, or software emulations where learners can practice hands-on skills (Ruiz et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2004).
- Assignment Submission and Review Tools: Functionality allowing learners to submit work (documents, videos, project files) demonstrating skill application, with workflows for manager or peer review and feedback (Wang, 2011).
- Video Assessment and Role-Play Capabilities: Features enabling learners to record themselves practicing skills (like sales pitches, presentations, or customer interactions) for asynchronous review and structured feedback using rubrics within the LMS.
- Competency Management Framework: Tools to define skills and competencies, map learning activities and assessments to them, and track individual progress toward proficiency levels.
- Performance-Based Assessment Options: Support for assessments that require learners to perform a task or solve a problem, rather than just answering multiple-choice questions.
- Integrated Feedback Mechanisms: Built-in tools for peer review, manager feedback forms, or integrations with coaching platforms to facilitate structured feedback loops.
- Social Learning Features: Discussion forums, communities of practice, and expert finders that allow learners to ask questions, share experiences, and learn from peers applying the same skills.
- Badging and Micro-Credentials: Awarding digital badges or credentials upon successful demonstration of specific skills, providing tangible recognition.
- Mobile Accessibility for Performance Support: Enabling access to checklists, job aids, or micro-learning modules (Díaz-Redondo et al., 2023) via mobile devices for just-in-time skill reinforcement in the field (Liu et al., 2010).
These features transform the LMS from a passive content repository into an active environment for skill practice and validation.
Tip: When evaluating LMS platforms for skill building, prioritize those offering robust support for interactive simulations and video assessment tools, as these are often crucial for effective practice and validation of complex skills.
Identifying Target Skills for LMS Training
While an LMS can support various types of learning, it's particularly effective for certain categories of skills, especially when blended with other methods. Organizations need to identify which skills are best suited for development within an LMS framework.
Skills commonly targeted for LMS-based training include:
- Technical Skills: Proficiency in using specific software, tools, equipment, or programming languages. LMS platforms excel here through simulations, tutorials, and hands-on practice modules. (e.g., CRM usage, coding skills, graphic design software).
- Procedural Skills: Learning and mastering specific step-by-step processes or workflows. The LMS can deliver standardized procedures, checklists, and assessments to ensure consistency. (e.g., following safety protocols, data entry processes, customer service workflows).
- Product Knowledge Application: Moving beyond knowing product features to being able to apply that knowledge in sales scenarios, support troubleshooting, or customer consultations. (e.g., demonstrating a product feature, configuring a solution).
- Compliance-Related Skills: Ensuring employees can correctly perform actions required by regulations, not just understand the rules. (e.g., executing a compliant transaction, following data privacy procedures).
- Analytical Skills: Developing the ability to interpret data, identify trends, and apply analytical frameworks. LMS modules can provide data sets, scenarios, and practice exercises. (e.g., reading financial reports, interpreting marketing analytics).
- Certain Soft Skills (Foundation & Practice): While complex soft skills require significant real-world practice, the LMS can deliver foundational knowledge, provide frameworks, host scenarios for initial practice, and facilitate video-based role-play for feedback. (e.g., structured feedback models, basic presentation techniques, active listening principles).
Understanding the type of skill helps determine the most effective LMS features and content design strategies.
Designing Skill-Focused Learning Paths
Simply placing skill-related content into an LMS isn't enough. Effective skill building requires intentionally designed learning paths that guide learners through a structured development process from foundational knowledge to confident application.
Key principles for designing skill-focused paths in an LMS:
- Start with Clear Objectives: Define precisely what skill proficiency looks like in observable, measurable terms. What should the learner be able to do after completing the path?
- Modular Structure: Break the skill down into sub-skills or progressive levels of complexity. Deliver content in focused modules addressing each component.
- Knowledge First, Then Practice: Ensure foundational knowledge is covered before introducing practice activities. Use short modules, videos, or readings accessible via the LMS.
- Integrate Frequent Practice Opportunities: Embed simulations, assignments, scenarios, or role-play activities throughout the path, not just at the end (Richey et al., 2023).
- Scaffold Difficulty: Start with simpler practice tasks and gradually increase complexity as the learner progresses. Provide guidance and support early on.
- Build-in Feedback Loops: Design points within the path where learners submit work or complete practice activities and receive structured feedback (peer, manager, automated).
- Include Application Assignments: Require learners to apply the skill to a real or simulated work task relevant to their role.
- Offer Resources for Reinforcement: Link to job aids, checklists, expert contacts, or discussion forums for ongoing support after the formal training.
- Use Assessments for Validation: Conclude paths with performance-based assessments that require learners to demonstrate the target skill.
This structured approach within the LMS provides a clear roadmap for skill acquisition.
Tip: To ensure relevance and buy-in, involve managers and top performers in the design and review of skill-focused learning paths within the LMS. Their input helps align practice activities with real-world job requirements.
Integrating Practice and Application within the LMS
Skill development hinges on practice. The LMS must serve as a hub or gateway to meaningful practice opportunities, moving learners from passive consumption to active engagement (Noe et al., 2014).
Methods for integrating practice and application:
- Embedded Simulations: Utilizing SCORM/xAPI compliant simulation tools (software simulations, branching scenarios, virtual labs) launched and tracked directly within the LMS environment.
- Case Study Analysis: Presenting detailed case studies within an LMS module and requiring learners to analyze the situation and propose solutions based on the skills being learned.
- Project-Based Assignments: Assigning tasks through the LMS that require learners to create something tangible (e.g., a project plan, a code snippet, a marketing brief, a presentation deck) applying the target skills. Submission and grading can be managed via LMS.
- Video Role-Play Submissions: Using LMS tools that allow learners to record and upload videos of themselves practicing skills (e.g., handling a customer objection, delivering feedback), enabling asynchronous practice and review (Hrastinski et al., 2008).
- Interactive Scenarios: Creating decision-making scenarios within e-learning modules where choices have consequences, forcing learners to apply judgment and skills.
- Linking to External Practice Environments: Providing access and potentially integrating tracking (via xAPI) with external sandboxes, development environments, or specialized practice tools relevant to the skill.
- Structured On-the-Job Assignments: While the work happens offline, the LMS can deliver instructions for specific on-the-job tasks designed for skill practice and provide a mechanism for submitting evidence or reflections.
Integrating these activities makes the LMS an active arena for skill refinement, not just content delivery.
Tip: Ensure practice simulations and assignments within the LMS accurately reflect real job tasks but start with slightly simplified scenarios. Gradually, increase complexity to build confidence alongside competence.
Leveraging Assessments for Skill Validation
Effective skill building requires assessments that go beyond multiple-choice quizzes to genuinely validate whether a learner can apply the skill. The LMS should support or integrate with tools enabling performance-based evaluation.
Approaches to skill validation via LMS:
- Performance-Based Tasks: Assigning tasks within the LMS that require learners to perform the skill directly (e.g., "Configure this setting in the simulated software," "Write a response to this customer email," "Analyze this data set and summarize findings").
- Simulation Scoring: Utilizing simulations where learner actions are scored based on efficiency, accuracy, and adherence to correct procedures in performing a skill.
- Observation Checklists (Digital): Providing managers or observers with digital checklists (potentially accessible via LMS or integrated tool) to evaluate a learner performing the skill in a real or simulated work environment.
- Video Assessment Rubrics: Using structured rubrics within the LMS to evaluate learner-submitted videos demonstrating skills like presentations, communication, or technical procedures.
- Project/Portfolio Review: Assessing submitted project work or portfolios through the LMS based on criteria demonstrating skill mastery.
- Scenario Outcomes: Evaluating learners based on the outcomes achieved in complex branching scenarios that require skillful navigation.
- Peer Assessment: Implementing workflows within the LMS where peers review and provide feedback on each other's skill demonstrations based on defined criteria (Wang, 2011).
These assessment methods provide more authentic evidence of skill acquisition than traditional knowledge tests.
The Role of Feedback in Skill Building via LMS
Feedback is the breakfast of champions, and it's critical for skill development (Salas et al., 2001). Learners need timely, specific, and constructive feedback to understand their strengths, weaknesses, and how to improve (Sitzmann et al., 2011). The LMS can facilitate various feedback loops.
Facilitating feedback through the LMS:
- Automated Feedback: Providing immediate feedback within simulations or interactive quizzes based on learner actions or choices.
- Instructor/Manager Feedback Tools: Enabling instructors or managers to provide written or video feedback directly on submitted assignments or video recordings within the LMS grading interface. Structured rubrics enhance consistency.
- Peer Review Workflows: Setting up processes where learners review and provide feedback on each other's work (e.g., project drafts, video practice sessions) guided by criteria within the LMS.
- AI-Powered Feedback: Integrating AI tools that can provide instant feedback on specific skills like writing clarity, code efficiency, or even aspects of speech delivery in recorded videos.
- Linking to Coaching Sessions: Using the LMS to schedule and track coaching sessions where personalized feedback on skill development is discussed.
- Discussion Forum Interaction: Encouraging feedback exchange and advice-sharing among learners within LMS discussion forums dedicated to specific skills or courses.
Integrating these feedback mechanisms ensures learners receive the guidance needed to refine their skills effectively.
Tip: When using peer or manager review features in the LMS, provide clear, structured rubrics or feedback guidelines. This ensures feedback is consistent, constructive, and focused on the targeted skills.
Tracking Skill Progression and Competency Mapping
To understand the impact of skill-building initiatives and manage talent effectively, organizations need to track skill development systematically (Noe et al., 2014). An LMS with competency management features is invaluable for this.
Using the LMS for tracking skill progression:
- Defining Competency Frameworks: Setting up the organization's skill or competency models within the LMS, defining different proficiency levels for each skill.
- Mapping Content and Assessments: Linking specific courses, activities, assessments, and badges within the LMS to the relevant skills or competencies they develop or validate (Harun, 2002).
- Tracking Proficiency Levels: Recording achieved proficiency levels based on assessment results, manager observations, or certification completions directly against user profiles.
- Generating Skill Gap Reports: Analyzing data to identify skill gaps at individual, team, or organizational levels based on required vs. achieved competencies.
- Visualizing Skill Profiles: Providing dashboards or reports that visualize an individual's or team's skill strengths and development areas.
- Informing Development Plans: Using skill gap data from the LMS to inform personalized learning path recommendations (Cheng et al., 2014) and individual development plans (IDPs).
- Supporting Internal Mobility: Utilizing skill profile data to identify employees with the necessary skills for open positions or project assignments.
This systematic tracking transforms skill development from an ad-hoc activity into a measurable component of talent strategy.
Tip: Use the skill gap reports generated by the LMS not just for individual development plans, but also to inform future training priorities and resource allocation across the organization.
Microlearning and Skill Reinforcement
Skills can atrophy if not used or reinforced. Microlearning delivered via LMS plays a crucial role in reinforcing newly acquired skills and providing just-in-time support for application on the job.
Using microlearning for skill reinforcement:
- Spaced Repetition: Delivering short quizzes or knowledge refreshers via the LMS at spaced intervals after initial training to combat the forgetting curve.
- Performance Support Tools: Providing easily searchable, bite-sized resources (checklists, short videos, quick reference guides) accessible via mobile LMS apps for immediate help when applying a skill.
- Scenario Snippets: Offering brief, focused scenarios for quick practice or decision-making related to a specific skill aspect.
- Tips and Tricks: Regularly pushing short tips or best practice reminders related to key skills through LMS notifications or dashboards.
- Just-in-Time Learning: Enabling employees to quickly look up how to perform a specific step or handle a particular situation related to a skill they've previously learned.
Integrating microlearning ensures that skill building is an ongoing process, not just a one-time training event.
Summary
A Skill Building Training LMS focuses specifically on developing demonstrable competence and practical abilities within the workforce, moving beyond simple knowledge transfer. It leverages specific LMS features that support practice, application, feedback, and performance-based validation, such as simulation support, video assessment tools, competency mapping, and robust feedback mechanisms. Designing skill-focused learning paths, integrating diverse practice opportunities, and using appropriate assessments are crucial for success. Tracking skill progression against competency frameworks allows organizations to manage talent strategically, while microlearning helps reinforce skills over time. By providing an integrated environment for acquiring, practicing, validating, and reinforcing skills, this type of LMS deployment becomes a powerful engine for enhancing individual capabilities and overall organizational performance.
- Cheng, B., Wang, M., Mørch, A. I., Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (2014). Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 11, 56–72.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1747938X14 - Díaz-Redondo, R. P., Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., López-Escobar, J. J., & Fernández-Vilas, A. (2023). Integrating micro-learning content in traditional e-learning platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06500.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06500 - Harun, M. H. (2001). Integrating e-learning into the workplace. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3-4), 301-310.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751601000732 - Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educational Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55.
https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and-synchronous-elearning - Lee, Y., Hsieh, Y. C., & Chen, Y. H. (2013). An investigation of employees’ use of e-learning systems: Applying the technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 173–189.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144929X.2011.577190 - Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m‑learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211–1219.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131510001508 - Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014). Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 245–275.
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321 - Reams, J. (2024). The Quest for Leadership Using the Technology of MyQuest for Leader Development. Center for Transformative Leadership. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380169282 - Richey, J. E., & Misiolek, N. (2023). Gamification and soft skills assessment in the development of a serious game. JMIR Serious Games, 11(1), e45436.
https://games.jmir.org/2023/1/e45436/ - Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 81(3), 207–212.
https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/abstract/2006/03000/the_impact_of_e_learning_in_medical_education.2.aspx - Salas, E. and Cannon‐Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499.
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471 - Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101.
https://journals.sagepub.com/stoken/rbtfl/g8tvuLmoeZfN2/full - Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta‐analysis of self‐regulated learning in work‐related training and educational attainment. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 405–449.
https://europepmc.org/article/med/21401218 - Wang, M. (2011). Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(3), 191–205.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x - Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr., J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75–79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200465318_can_E-learning_Replace_Classroom_Learning
Looking for an LMS?
MyQuest LMS is the best Learning Management System (LMS) platform for SMBs, training companies and online coaching. MyQuest LMS offers Action-Based Learning with Personalized Feedback for Optimal Skill Development (Reams, 2024). With our “Quest Builder,” you can easily create gamified training experiences structured around practical activities. Each activity is followed by personalized feedback from an expert, peers, or an AI assistant trained on your content.
Want to learn more about MyQuest LMS?
Further reading about MyQuest LMS:
- MyQuest LMS for Employee Training
- MyQuest LMS for Training companies
- MyQuest LMS for Customer Training
- MyQuest LMS Coaching Platform
- Myquest LMS for Non-Profit Organizations (NGOs)
- Myquest LMS Case Studies and Testimonials
Questions? Suggestions? Remarks?
Contact us at: info@myquest.co