Corporate Learning

Corporate Learning

by Ari Manor
|
Jun 03, 2025

This article, about Corporate Learning, includes the following chapters:

Corporate Learning

Bibliography

Additional Information

The article is one in a series of dozens of articles included in our Corporate LMS Guide, a guide that provides the most detailed and updated information about Corporate LMS. For other articles in the series see:

The Full Guide to Corporate LMS

Note: We strive to help you understand and implement LMS (Learning Management System) solutions in the best possible way, based on up-to-date, research-based information. To achieve this, we have included references to reliable sources and practical examples from the business world in our articles. We regularly update the content to ensure its relevance and accuracy, but it is important to personally verify that the information is accurate and that its application fits your organization’s needs and goals. If you find an error in the article or are aware of a more updated and relevant source, we would be happy if you contacted us. Good luck on your journey to improving the learning experiences in your organization!

Corporate Learning

Corporate learning encompasses the entire spectrum of activities, processes, and strategies an organization employs to enhance the knowledge, skills, abilities, and overall competence of its workforce. It extends far beyond traditional, formal training sessions to include informal learning (García-Peñalvo et al., 2015), social collaboration, experiential opportunities, and continuous professional development (Littlejohn et al., 2014). In today's rapidly evolving business landscape, corporate learning is not merely a human resources function but a strategic imperative, crucial for fostering innovation, driving performance, improving adaptability, ensuring compliance, and attracting and retaining top talent. A robust corporate learning strategy aims to create a dynamic learning ecosystem that supports employees throughout their career journey, aligning individual growth with organizational objectives (Alonso et al., 2008) and building a resilient, future-ready workforce.

Corporate Learning Management System (LMS)

A Corporate Learning Management System (LMS) often serves as the central technological platform facilitating and managing many aspects of a comprehensive corporate learning strategy. While not the entirety of corporate learning itself, the LMS provides the infrastructure to deliver, track, manage, and report on a wide array of learning activities (Selim et al., 2007), both formal and informal (García-Peñalvo et al., 2015). It acts as a repository for diverse learning content, automates administrative tasks associated with training programs, enables personalized learning paths (Cheng et al., 2014), and often incorporates tools for social learning  (Cheng et al., 2011) and performance support.

Key roles of an LMS within the broader corporate learning landscape include:

  • Content Delivery: Hosting and delivering various learning materials, including e-learning modules, videos, documents, webinars, and assessments.
  • Tracking and Reporting: Monitoring learner progress, completion rates, assessment scores, and generating reports for compliance and effectiveness analysis.
  • Administration Automation: Managing enrollments, scheduling, notifications, and certification tracking, reducing administrative burden.
  • Personalization Engine: Facilitating the assignment of tailored learning paths based on roles, skills gaps, or individual development plans.
  • Integration Hub: Connecting with other HR and business systems (like HRIS, performance management) to create a cohesive talent development ecosystem.
  • Supporting Blended Learning: Managing both online components and logistics for offline or instructor-led training sessions (Al-Busaidi et al., 2012).
  • Facilitating Social Learning: Often includes features like discussion forums, wikis, or integrations with collaborative tools to encourage knowledge sharing (Roffe et al., 2002).

An effective LMS empowers organizations to scale learning initiatives, ensure consistency, measure impact, and provide accessible learning opportunities that support the overall corporate learning culture (Newton et al., 2003).

Tip: To maximize your LMS's value, regularly review its usage analytics and gather user feedback to identify popular content, underutilized features, and areas needing improvement for better engagement.

The Importance of Continuous Learning in the Workplace

In an era defined by rapid technological advancements, shifting market demands, and evolving job roles, continuous learning has transitioned from a 'nice-to-have' to a fundamental necessity for both individual employees and the organization as a whole (Littlejohn et al., 2014). It represents an ongoing, voluntary, and self-motivated pursuit of knowledge and skills for personal or professional reasons. Fostering a culture where continuous learning is embedded is critical for sustained success (Newton et al., 2003). Advanced LMS solutions, such as myQuest, include various componens that support continues learning, as described here.

The significance of continuous learning includes:

  • Maintaining Skill Relevance: Helps employees keep their skills up-to-date and acquire new competencies needed to perform effectively in current and future roles, combating skill obsolescence.
  • Boosting Adaptability and Resilience: Equips the workforce to better navigate change, embrace new technologies, and adapt to evolving business strategies and market conditions.
  • Driving Innovation and Problem-Solving: Exposure to new ideas, perspectives, and knowledge fuels creativity and enhances the ability to identify and solve complex problems.
  • Enhancing Employee Engagement and Retention: Providing opportunities for growth and development demonstrates organizational investment in employees, leading to higher job satisfaction, motivation, and loyalty.
  • Improving Performance and Productivity: Skilled and knowledgeable employees are generally more efficient, effective, and capable of delivering higher quality work.
  • Supporting Career Growth: Empowers employees to take ownership of their career development, acquire skills for advancement, and achieve their professional aspirations within the organization.
  • Maintaining Competitive Advantage: Organizations with a highly skilled, adaptable, and continuously learning workforce are better positioned to outperform competitors.

Organizations actively promoting continuous learning create a dynamic environment where growth is constant, benefiting both the individual and the business's bottom line (Littlejohn et al., 2014).

Tip: Encourage continuous learning by integrating short learning activities or discussions into regular team meetings, making it a visible and routine part of the work week rather than a separate task.

Formal vs. Informal Learning in a Corporate Setting

Corporate learning strategies typically encompass a blend of formal and informal learning approaches, recognizing that employees acquire knowledge and skills through various channels (García-Peñalvo et al., 2015). Understanding the distinction and interplay between these two modes is crucial for designing effective learning ecosystems.

Key differences and characteristics include:

Formal Learning:

  • Structure: Highly structured, planned, and often curriculum-driven.
  • Delivery: Typically delivered through scheduled courses, workshops, seminars, webinars, or mandatory e-learning modules.
  • Goals: Often focused on specific, predefined learning objectives (Govindasamy et al., 2001), compliance requirements, or standardized skill acquisition.
  • Control: Usually initiated and controlled by the organization or L&D department.
  • Examples: New hire orientation, compliance training, software certification programs, leadership development courses.

Informal Learning:

  • Structure: Unstructured, organic, and often learner-driven or occurs spontaneously.
  • Delivery: Happens through daily work experiences, observation, conversations with colleagues, mentoring, coaching, self-directed research (e.g., searching online, reading articles), trial-and-error, and participation in communities of practice.
  • Goals: Often driven by immediate needs, problem-solving, curiosity, or personal interest.
  • Control: Primarily initiated and controlled by the learner, often occurring "just-in-time."
  • Examples: Asking a coworker for help, watching a tutorial video online, shadowing an expert, reading industry blogs, learning from mistakes on a project.

While formal learning provides essential foundational knowledge and ensures consistency, research (like the 70-20-10 model for learning and development) suggests that a significant portion of workplace learning occurs informally (70% experiential, 20% social, 10% formal). An effective corporate learning strategy leverages both, using formal methods for core competencies and compliance, while actively fostering an environment that supports and encourages informal and social knowledge sharing and on-the-job learning.

Social Learning and Knowledge Sharing

Social learning, the process of learning through observing, imitating, and interacting with others, is a powerful and often underestimated component of corporate learning (Cheng et al., 2011). It recognizes that employees gain significant knowledge and skills by collaborating, sharing insights, and learning from the experiences and expertise of their peers and mentors within the organization. Facilitating effective knowledge sharing is key to leveraging the collective intelligence of the workforce.

Mechanisms and benefits of social learning and knowledge sharing include:

  • Peer-to-Peer Learning: Employees sharing tips, best practices, troubleshooting advice, and experiences directly with one another (Eom et al., 2018).
  • Mentoring and Coaching: Structured or informal relationships where experienced employees guide and support the development of others. Some vendors, like myQuest, provide LMS platrorm that are tailored for coaching, and even include AI mentoring capabilities.
  • Communities of Practice (CoPs): Groups of employees with shared interests or roles who collaborate regularly to share knowledge, solve problems, and develop expertise in their domain.
  • Collaborative Problem-Solving: Teams working together on projects or challenges, learning from diverse perspectives and approaches (Roffe et al., 2002).
  • Expert Directories: Identifying and making subject matter experts accessible within the organization whom others can consult.
  • Leveraging Technology: Using internal social networks, discussion forums (often within an LMS), wikis, shared document repositories, and instant messaging platforms to facilitate communication and knowledge exchange.
  • Benefits: Faster problem-solving, reduced duplication of effort, increased innovation, preservation of institutional knowledge, stronger team cohesion, and enhanced onboarding for new employees.

Actively promoting social learning transforms the workplace into a dynamic environment where knowledge flows freely, accelerating learning and improving overall organizational capability (Cheng et al., 2011).

Tip: Foster social learning by creating dedicated online forums or channels (e.g., on Teams or Slack) for specific topics or projects where employees can easily ask questions and share insights. Assign moderators or champions to keep conversations active and helpful.

Experiential Learning and On-the-Job Training

Experiential learning is founded on the principle of "learning by doing." It emphasizes gaining knowledge and skills through direct experience, reflection, and practical application within the context of actual work. On-the-job training (OJT) is a primary form of experiential learning, where employees learn the necessary skills and competencies while performing their regular job functions, often under the guidance of a supervisor or experienced colleague. 

Key aspects of experiential learning and OJT include:

  • Direct Application: Learners immediately apply new concepts or skills in real-world situations, reinforcing understanding and retention.
  • Problem-Based Learning: Engaging with actual work challenges requires learners to actively seek solutions, test hypotheses, and learn from the outcomes.
  • Reflection: Encouraging learners to reflect on their experiences – what worked, what didn't, and why – is crucial for extracting meaningful lessons.
  • Feedback Loops: Receiving timely feedback on performance during tasks allows for immediate correction and refinement of skills (Sitzmann et al., 2011).
  • Types of Experiential Learning: Includes OJT, job rotations, stretch assignments, project-based work, simulations, case studies, apprenticeships, and action learning projects (Richey et al., 2023).
  • Structured OJT: While often informal, OJT can be structured with clear objectives, checklists, defined mentorship roles, and progress tracking to ensure effectiveness and consistency.
  • Benefits: High relevance and transferability of skills to the job, increased engagement through active participation, development of practical problem-solving abilities, and cost-effectiveness compared to purely off-site training (Lee et al., 2013).

Integrating experiential learning opportunities into the corporate learning strategy ensures that theoretical knowledge is translated into practical capability, making learning highly relevant and impactful. You can make your life easier, and boost knowledge in your organization, by chosing an LMS platform that already supports on-the-job training. For example, myQuest LMS, that implements the 70-20-10 model, with 70% on-the-job experiences, 20% social learing and only 10% formal learning.

Developing a Corporate Learning Culture

A corporate learning culture exists when learning is deeply embedded in the organization's values, beliefs, and behaviors (Tennyson et al., 2010), actively encouraged, and seamlessly integrated into the daily work lives of employees at all levels. It's an environment where curiosity is welcomed, knowledge sharing is the norm, seeking development opportunities is supported, and learning from mistakes is viewed as part of growth. Building such a culture is essential for realizing the full potential of any corporate learning initiative (Newton et al., 2003).

Strategies for fostering a strong learning culture include:

  • Leadership Commitment and Role Modeling: Senior leaders must visibly champion learning (Harun, 2002), participate in development activities themselves, and communicate its strategic importance (Strother et al., 2002).
  • Aligning Learning with Business Goals: Ensure learning initiatives directly support organizational objectives (Alonso et al., 2008) and demonstrate clear value (Govindasamy et al., 2001).
  • Providing Time and Resources: Allocate dedicated time for learning during work hours and provide access to necessary tools, platforms (like the LMS), content libraries, and financial support for external courses or certifications.
  • Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: Implement platforms and processes that facilitate easy sharing of expertise, best practices, and lessons learned (e.g., CoPs, internal wikis, social forums).
  • Recognizing and Rewarding Learning: Acknowledge and celebrate employees' learning achievements, skill development, and efforts to share knowledge with others (Ibáñez et al., 2014). Link learning to performance reviews and career progression where appropriate.
  • Fostering Psychological Safety: Create an environment where employees feel safe to ask questions, admit they don't know something, experiment, and learn from failures without fear of negative repercussions.
  • Empowering Employees: Encourage employees to take ownership of their learning journey by providing choices, personalized paths (Cheng et al., 2014), and tools for self-assessment and development planning.
  • Integrating Learning into Workflows: Embed learning resources and support directly into the tools and processes employees use daily ("learning in the flow of work").

Cultivating a learning culture is an ongoing effort that requires sustained commitment (Harun, 2002) but yields significant long-term benefits in terms of innovation, agility, and employee capability.

Measuring the Impact of Corporate Learning

To demonstrate the value and ensure the effectiveness of corporate learning initiatives, organizations need robust methods for measuring their impact beyond simple completion metrics. Effective measurement links learning activities to tangible individual and organizational outcomes.

Approaches to measuring impact often draw from frameworks like the Kirkpatrick Model (Kirkpatrick et al., 2006):

  • Level 1: Reaction: Measuring learner satisfaction and perceived relevance (Harun, 2002) through feedback forms, surveys, and informal feedback (Salas et al., 2001) immediately after a learning experience. (Did they like it?)
  • Level 2: Learning: Assessing the degree to which participants acquired the intended knowledge, skills, attitudes (Newton et al., 2003), confidence, and commitment through quizzes, tests, skill assessments, simulations, or demonstrations. (Did they learn it?)
  • Level 3: Behavior: Evaluating the extent to which participants apply what they learned back on the job (Tennyson et al., 2010). This often involves manager observations, peer feedback (Wang, 2011), self-assessments, performance data analysis, or 360-degree feedback sometime after the training. (Are they using it?)
  • Level 4: Results: Measuring the impact of the learning intervention on business outcomes and organizational objectives. This involves correlating learning data with key performance indicators (KPIs) such as productivity increases, sales growth, cost reductions, improved quality, higher customer satisfaction, reduced employee turnover, or faster time-to-market. (Did it impact the bottom line?)
    • Tip: When measuring Level 4 Results, select just 1-2 highly relevant KPIs per learning initiative to track, rather than trying to measure everything. Ensure you establish a clear baseline before the learning intervention to accurately assess its impact.
  • Return on Investment (ROI): Often considered a fifth level, ROI analysis compares the monetary benefits derived from the learning program to its total costs (Appana et al., 2008), providing a financial justification.

Utilizing a multi-level approach provides a comprehensive picture of learning effectiveness, helps refine programs, and demonstrates the strategic contribution of corporate learning to the organization. LMS platforms with strong analytics capabilities are vital tools in capturing much of this data (Wang et al., 2011).

Personalization in Corporate Learning

Personalization involves tailoring learning experiences, content, and pathways to meet the specific needs, goals, preferences, and existing knowledge levels of individual employees. Moving away from one-size-fits-all approaches, personalization makes corporate learning more relevant, engaging, and efficient, significantly boosting its effectiveness (Abaricia et al., 2023).

Methods for achieving personalization in corporate learning include:

  • Role-Based Learning Paths: Assigning specific sequences of courses and resources based on an employee's job function, responsibilities, and required competencies.
  • Skills Gap Analysis: Using assessments or performance data to identify individual skill gaps and recommending targeted learning interventions to address them.
  • Learner Profiles and Preferences: Allowing employees to set preferences regarding learning formats (video, text, interactive), topics of interest, and career goals, which then inform content recommendations.
  • Adaptive Learning Technology: Utilizing algorithms (often AI-driven within an LMS) that dynamically adjust the difficulty, pace, or content presented based on the learner's real-time performance and interactions (Abaricia et al., 2023; Sharma et al., 2008).
  • Curated Content Recommendations: Suggesting relevant articles, videos, courses, or experts based on an employee's profile, learning history, search queries, or stated interests.
  • Self-Directed Learning Support: Providing access to broad content libraries and tools that empower employees to explore topics relevant to their individual needs (Johnson et al., 2009) and curiosity (Harun, 2002).
  • Modular Content Design (Microlearning): Breaking down content into smaller, focused chunks allows learners to easily access specific information they need "just-in-time" and build personalized learning journeys from these blocks (Díaz-Redondo et al., 2023).

Personalization respects individual differences, optimizes learning time, increases motivation (Brown et al., 2013), and ensures that corporate learning efforts directly contribute to closing relevant skill gaps and achieving personal and organizational objectives.

Tip: Implement personalization efficiently by starting with role-based learning paths for key positions or high-priority skill areas, using existing job descriptions and competency models as a foundation. You can refine these paths over time based on performance data and employee feedback (Salas et al., 2001).

Summary

Corporate learning is a strategic, multifaceted endeavor crucial for organizational success in the modern economy. It encompasses formal training, informal knowledge acquisition, social collaboration, and on-the-job experiences, all aimed at building workforce capability. Key elements include leveraging technology like the Corporate Learning Management System (LMS) to manage and deliver learning, fostering a culture of continuous improvement, balancing formal and informal methods, promoting social and experiential learning, and personalizing experiences to individual needs. Measuring the impact of these initiatives beyond simple metrics is vital to demonstrate value and refine strategies. Ultimately, a well-executed corporate learning strategy develops a more skilled, adaptable, engaged, and innovative workforce prepared to meet current challenges and future opportunities.

Bibliography
  1. Abaricia, C. P., & Delos Santos, M. L. C. (2023). Enhancing e-learning systems through learning management system (LMS) technologies: Reshaping the learner experience. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12354.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12354
  2. Al‑Busaidi, K. A. (2012). Key factors to instructors’ satisfaction of learning management systems in blended learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24, 18–39.
    https://www.academia.edu/124230645/Key_factors_to_instructors_satisfaction_of_learning_management_systems_in_blended_learning
  3. Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2008). Learning objects, learning objectives and learning design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 389–400.
    https://oa.upm.es/2424/1/INVE_MEM_2008_55924.pdf
  4. Appana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(1), 5–22.
    https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22909/
  5. Brown, K. G. and Charlier S.D. (2013). An integrative model of e-learning use: Leveraging theory to understand and increase usage. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 37–49.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053482212000472 
  6. Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1–32.
    https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/140
  7. Cheng, B., Wang, M., Mørch, A. I., Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (2014). Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 11, 56–72.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1747938X14
  8. Cheng, B., Wang, M., Yang, S. J., Kinshuk, & Peng, J. (2011). Acceptance of competency-based workplace e-learning systems: Effects of individual and peer learning support. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1317–1333.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131511000352
  9. Díaz-Redondo, R. P., Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., López-Escobar, J. J., & Fernández-Vilas, A. (2023). Integrating micro-learning content in traditional e-learning platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06500.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06500
  10. Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. (2018). A system’s view of e-learning success model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 16(1), 42-76.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322783738_A_System's_View_of_E-Learning_Success_Model
  11. García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Seoane Pardo, A. M. (2015). An updated review of the concept of eLearning. Tenth anniversary. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 16(1), 119–144.
    https://doaj.org/article/80224f0585ed4779bfa0df4885e74450 
  12. Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3–4), 287–299.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751601000719
  13. Ibáñez, M. B., Di-Serio, Á., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014). Gamification for engaging computer science students in learning activities: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(3), 291–301.
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6827214
  14. Johnson, R. D., Gueutal, H., & Falbe, C. M. (2009). Technology, trainees, metacognitive activity and e-learning effectiveness. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(5), 353–364.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02683940910974125/full/html
  15. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
    https://bkconnection.com/static/Evaluating_Training_Programs_EXCERPT.pdf
  16. Lee, Y., Hsieh, Y. C., & Chen, Y. H. (2013). An investigation of employees’ use of e-learning systems: Applying the technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 173–189.
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144929X.2011.577190 
  17. Littlejohn, Allison and Margaryan, Anoush (2014). Technology-enhanced Professional Learning. In: Billet, Stephen; Harteis, Christian and Gruber, Hans eds. International Handbook on Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1187–1212.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
  18. Newton, R. (2003). Staff attitudes to the development and delivery of e-learning. New Library World, Vol. 104 No. 10, pp. 412-425.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03074800310504357
  19. Reams, J. (2024). The Quest for Leadership Using the Technology of MyQuest for Leader Development. Center for Transformative Leadership. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380169282
  20. Richey, J. E., & Misiolek, N. (2023). Gamification and soft skills assessment in the development of a serious game. JMIR Serious Games, 11(1), e45436.
    https://games.jmir.org/2023/1/e45436/
  21. Roffe, I. (2002). E-learning: engagement, enhancement and execution. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(1), 40–50.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09684880210416102/full/html
  22. Salas, E. and Cannon‐Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499.
    https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471
  23. Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396–413.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131505001338
  24. Sharma, R., Gupta, P., & Kumar, M. (2008). A framework for adaptive e-learning systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 112–119). IEEE.
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4670262
  25. Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta‐analysis of self‐regulated learning in work‐related training and educational attainment. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 405–449.
    https://europepmc.org/article/med/21401218
  26. Strother, J. (2002). An assessment of the effectiveness of e-learning in corporate training programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1–17.
    https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/83
  27. Tennyson, R. D. (2010). Historical reflection on learning theories and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 93–95.
    https://www.cedtech.net/download/historical-reflection-on-learning-theories-and-instructional-design-5958.pdf
  28. Wang, M. (2011). Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(3), 191–205.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
  29. Wang, M., Vogel, D., & Ran, W. (2011). Creating a performance-oriented e-learning environment: A design science approach. Information & Management, 48(7), 260–269. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378720611000565
Additional Information

Looking for an LMS?

MyQuest LMS is the best Learning Management System (LMS) platform for SMBs, training companies and online coaching. MyQuest LMS offers Action-Based Learning with Personalized Feedback for Optimal Skill Development (Reams, 2024). With our “Quest Builder,” you can easily create gamified training experiences structured around practical activities. Each activity is followed by personalized feedback from an expert, peers, or an AI assistant trained on your content.

Want to learn more about MyQuest LMS?

Further reading about MyQuest LMS:

Questions? Suggestions? Remarks?

Contact us at: info@myquest.co