LMS Online

LMS Online

by Ari Manor
|
Jun 03, 2025

This article, about LMS Online, includes the following chapters:

LMS Online

Bibliography

Additional Information

The article is one in a series of dozens of articles included in our Corporate LMS Guide, a guide that provides the most detailed and updated information about Corporate LMS. For other articles in the series see:

The Full Guide to Corporate LMS

Note: We strive to help you understand and implement LMS (Learning Management System) solutions in the best possible way, based on up-to-date, research-based information. To achieve this, we have included references to reliable sources and practical examples from the business world in our articles. We regularly update the content to ensure its relevance and accuracy, but it is important to personally verify that the information is accurate and that its application fits your organization’s needs and goals. If you find an error in the article or are aware of a more updated and relevant source, we would be happy if you contacted us. Good luck on your journey to improving the learning experiences in your organization!

LMS Online

The term LMS Online refers to Learning Management Systems that are accessed and operated primarily over the internet, typically through a web browser or dedicated mobile application (Liu et al., 2010). This distinguishes them from older, less common methods involving software installations on individual computers or distribution via physical media. Essentially, an LMS Online leverages the power and ubiquity of the internet to deliver, manage, track, and report on corporate training and development programs. It embodies the shift towards accessible, flexible, and continuously updated learning technologies. The online nature is fundamental to enabling features like real-time progress tracking, collaborative learning tools (Noe et al., 2014; Roffe et al., 2002), instant content updates (Liaw et al., 2008), and seamless integration with other web-based business systems. For most modern organizations, when they talk about implementing an LMS, they are inherently referring to an LMS Online, often synonymous with cloud-based or SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) platforms, which offer unparalleled convenience and scalability compared to traditional on-premises installations.

Defining "LMS Online": Beyond Just Internet Access

While the core definition of an LMS Online is its accessibility via the internet, the concept encompasses more than just remote access (Shurygin et al., 2021). It represents a fundamental shift in how learning technology is delivered, managed, and experienced within an organization (Bondarouk et al., 2016). 

Understanding these nuances is key to appreciating Online LMS full value:

  • Web-Native Operation: Unlike software merely accessed remotely, a true LMS Online is often designed and built for the web. This means interfaces are typically browser-based, leveraging standard web technologies (HTML5, CSS, JavaScript) for cross-platform compatibility without requiring specific client-side software installations (beyond the browser itself).
  • Continuous Connectivity Assumption: These platforms operate on the assumption of consistent internet connectivity for most functions, enabling real-time data synchronization, communication features, and access to centrally hosted content and resources. While some may offer limited offline capabilities, the core experience is designed around being connected (Allen et al., 2007).
    • Tip: If supporting users with unreliable internet, prioritize LMS Online platforms offering robust offline access features and communicate clearly how to download content and sync progress.
  • Centralized Hosting and Management: Implicit in the "online" model is that the LMS software and data reside on servers managed by the vendor (or the organization, in the less common case of a self-hosted web application, though usually "LMS Online" implies a vendor-hosted/SaaS model). This centralization facilitates updates, maintenance, and consistent access for all users.
  • Immediacy and Real-Time Interaction: The online nature enables instant content updates pushed by administrators (Liaw et al., 2008), real-time tracking of learner progress (Zhang et al., 2004), immediate feedback mechanisms (quizzes, polls), and live collaborative features (chat, forums, virtual classrooms [Noe et al., 2014]).
  • Platform Agnosticism (Ideally): A key goal is accessibility from various devices (desktops, laptops, tablets, smartphones) and operating systems (Windows, macOS, iOS, Android) through standard web browsers or responsive mobile apps, freeing users from being tied to specific hardware.
  • Integration via Web Services: Being online facilitates easier integration with other cloud-based business systems (HRIS, CRM, etc.) through APIs and web protocols, creating a connected digital ecosystem.

Essentially, "LMS Online" signifies more than just remote availability; it represents a dynamic, connected, and centrally managed platform designed for the modern digital workplace.

Tip: To fully leverage the "online" aspect, ensure your LMS content strategy includes regularly updated materials and timely announcements, making the platform a dynamic resource rather than a static repository.

Accessibility and User Experience Benefits

The online nature of an LMS is arguably its most significant advantage from a user's perspective, breaking down traditional barriers to training and development. This enhanced accessibility translates directly into a more positive and effective user experience. 

Key benefits include:

  • Anytime, Anywhere Learning: Users can access training materials and complete coursework whenever and wherever is most convenient for them – at the office, at home, or while traveling – provided they have an internet connection. This supports flexible work schedules, remote employees, and global teams operating across different time zones.
  • Cross-Device Compatibility: Modern LMS Online platforms are typically designed with responsive interfaces that adapt to different screen sizes, ensuring a consistent experience on desktops, laptops, tablets, and smartphones. Many also offer dedicated mobile apps for an optimized mobile learning (mLearning) experience (Liu et al., 2010).
  • Reduced Technical Barriers: Since the LMS is accessed via a standard web browser, users don't need to install specific software on their devices. This simplifies rollout and minimizes compatibility issues, requiring only a modern browser and internet access.
  • Personalized Learning Paths: Online platforms can more easily leverage user data (job role, department, past performance, stated interests) to present personalized learning paths and content recommendations, making the experience more relevant and engaging for the individual (Cheng et al., 2014).
  • Just-in-Time Learning: Employees can quickly access specific information or "microlearning" modules online (Díaz-Redondo et al., 2023) exactly when they need it to perform a task or solve a problem, integrating learning directly into the workflow.
  • Consistent User Interface: All users access the same version of the platform, ensuring a consistent interface and experience, regardless of their location or device (within the bounds of responsive design).
  • Support for Diverse Learning Styles: Online platforms can easily host a variety of content formats – videos, interactive simulations (Strother et al., 2002), documents, podcasts, quizzes, games – catering to different learning preferences.

These accessibility features remove friction from the learning process, encouraging greater participation and engagement by making training readily available and convenient for the modern workforce.

Tip: Actively promote the cross-device compatibility and mobile app features of your LMS Online to encourage learners to engage with training during commuting or downtime, truly enabling 'anytime, anywhere' learning.

Real-Time Data and Analytics

A major advantage of an LMS being online is its inherent ability to capture, process, and display data in real-time or near real-time. This immediate feedback loop is invaluable for learners (Zhang et al., 2004), managers, and administrators alike, enabling more dynamic and responsive training programs (Sitzmann et al., 2011). 

Key aspects include:

  • Instant Progress Tracking: As learners interact with content (viewing videos, completing modules, taking quizzes), the LMS Online can immediately record their progress and status. Learners can see exactly where they stand, what they've completed, and what's next.
  • Real-Time Assessment Results: Scores from quizzes, tests, and assessments can be calculated and displayed instantly upon completion, providing immediate feedback to the learner and recording the result for administrative review (Govindasamy et al., 2001).
    • Tip: Leverage real-time assessment results by designing quizzes with immediate, targeted feedback that directs learners to specific resources if they answer incorrectly, reinforcing learning instantly.
  • Up-to-the-Minute Reporting: Administrators and managers can access dashboards and generate reports that reflect the latest activity and completion data across individuals, teams, or the entire organization. This allows for timely intervention if progress is lagging, or specific groups need support.
  • Dynamic Leaderboards and Gamification: Features like points (Ibáñez et al., 2014), badges, and leaderboards rely on real-time data to reflect current standings and achievements, fostering friendly competition (Sung et al., 2019) and engagement (Sitzmann, 2011b).
  • Tracking Engagement Metrics: Beyond completions, LMS Online platforms can track metrics like time spent on modules, frequency of logins, participation in forums, and content access patterns, providing deeper insights into learner engagement.
  • Compliance Monitoring: For mandatory training, real-time tracking ensures that administrators have an accurate, up-to-date view of compliance status across the organization, allowing for prompt follow-up on overdue assignments.
  • Data-Driven Decision Making: The availability of current data enables learning and development teams to quickly identify popular courses, content areas where learners struggle, completion trends, and the overall effectiveness of training initiatives, allowing for agile adjustments to strategy and content.

This immediacy of data transforms reporting from a periodic, backward-looking exercise into a continuous (Littlejohn et al., 2014), actionable insight stream, enhancing the management and impact of corporate learning.

Collaboration and Social Learning Features

The interconnected nature of an LMS Online (Wasilik & Bolliger, 2009) makes it an ideal environment for fostering collaboration and social learning among employees (Arbaugh et al., 2008), moving beyond purely individual consumption of content (García-Peñalvo et al., 2015). These features leverage the platform's connectivity to build a sense of community and enable peer-to-peer knowledge sharing (Bates et al., 2012), as described here

Common collaborative elements include:

  • Discussion Forums: Integrated forums allow learners to ask questions, share insights, discuss course topics, and help each other (Bullen et al., 1998), creating a persistent knowledge base around specific courses or themes (Noe et al., 2014). Instructors and subject matter experts can also participate to guide discussions (Roffe et al., 2002).
  • Integrated Chat/Messaging: Real-time chat functionalities, either within specific courses or platform-wide, enable quick questions, informal discussions (Bullen et al., 1998), and direct communication between learners or with instructors (Kang et al., 2013).
  • Group Projects and Workspaces: Some LMS Online platforms provide tools for learners to collaborate on assignments or projects within designated groups, including shared file spaces, discussion areas, and task management features.
    • Tip: For group projects within the LMS Online, provide clear instructions, defined roles (if applicable), and project milestones to ensure collaboration is structured and effective, not just chaotic.
  • Peer Review and Feedback: Functionality allowing learners to review and provide constructive feedback on each other's assignments or contributions promotes deeper engagement and learning from different perspectives (Wang, 2011).
  • User Profiles and Networking: Profiles showcasing expertise, completed courses, or interests can help employees connect with colleagues who have similar learning goals or relevant knowledge (Harun, 2002).
  • Wikis and Shared Knowledge Bases: Collaborative spaces where users can contribute to and edit shared documents or knowledge bases, fostering collective intelligence building.
  • Activity Feeds: Social media-style feeds can display recent activities, achievements, new content postings, or forum discussions, increasing visibility and encouraging participation.
  • Integration with Enterprise Social Networks: Connecting the LMS Online with existing company communication platforms (like Slack or Microsoft Teams) can further embed learning discussions into daily workflows.

By incorporating these features, an LMS Online transitions from a simple content repository to a dynamic learning ecosystem where employees can learn not just from the material, but also from each other.

Tip: Encourage active use of discussion forums (Bullen et al., 1998) by posing specific questions related to course content or asking learners to share real-world examples, guiding the conversation beyond simple Q&A.

Integration with the Web-Based Ecosystem

An LMS Online doesn't exist in a vacuum; its value is significantly amplified by its ability to integrate smoothly with the broader ecosystem of web-based tools and services that organizations rely on (Wasilik & Bolliger, 2009). This connectivity streamlines processes, enhances functionality, and creates a more unified digital employee experience. Key integration points include:

  • HRIS/HCM Systems: Automatically syncing employee data (new hires, role changes, terminations) from the Human Resources Information System ensures the LMS user base is always up-to-date. Completion data can sometimes be pushed back to the HRIS for a central employee record.
  • Single Sign-On (SSO): Integrating with corporate identity providers (e.g., Azure AD, Okta, G Suite) allows users to log in to the LMS using their standard company credentials, improving security and convenience.
  • CRM Systems: For sales, support, or partner training, integrating the LMS with the Customer Relationship Management system allows tracking training completion against specific accounts or opportunities and can trigger relevant training assignments.
  • Video Conferencing Platforms: Seamless integration with tools like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, or Webex enables scheduling, launching, and tracking attendance for Virtual Instructor-Led Training (VILT) sessions directly within the LMS.
  • Online Content Libraries: Direct integration allows access to vast libraries of off-the-shelf courses from providers (e.g., LinkedIn Learning, Coursera, Udemy Business) within the LMS interface, expanding the learning catalog effortlessly.
  • Web Services and APIs: Robust Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) allow for custom integrations with proprietary systems or other third-party applications, enabling data exchange and workflow automation tailored to specific organizational needs.
  • E-commerce Gateways: For organizations selling training, integration with online payment processors (Stripe, PayPal) facilitates seamless course purchase and enrollment.
  • Analytics and BI Tools: Exporting data or integrating directly with Business Intelligence platforms allows for more sophisticated analysis and visualization of learning data alongside other business metrics.

The ability of an LMS Online to act as a connected hub within the organization's digital infrastructure is crucial for maximizing its efficiency and impact.

Security in an Always-Connected Environment

While the online nature of an LMS offers immense benefits (Wasilik & Bolliger, 2009), it also necessitates a strong focus on security to protect sensitive user data and corporate learning content. Operating in an always-connected environment requires robust measures from both the LMS vendor and the client organization. 

Key security considerations include:

  • Secure Authentication: Implementing strong password policies, offering Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), and integrating with corporate Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are fundamental to preventing unauthorized access.
  • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Ensuring that users only have access to the data and functionalities relevant to their role (learner, manager, instructor, administrator) minimizes the risk of accidental or malicious data exposure or system changes.
  • Data Encryption: Critical data, including user information and potentially sensitive course content, must be encrypted both in transit (using protocols like TLS/SSL to secure data moving between the user's browser and the server) and at rest (encrypting data stored on the vendor's servers).
  • Vendor Security Posture: Organizations must vet the security practices of the LMS vendor, looking for adherence to industry standards (e.g., SOC 2, ISO 27001), regular security audits, penetration testing, and clear data privacy policies (e.g., GDPR, CCPA compliance).
  • Infrastructure Security: The vendor is responsible for securing the underlying cloud infrastructure, including network security (firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention), server hardening, and physical security of data centers.
  • Regular Updates and Patching: The vendor must diligently apply security patches and updates to the LMS software and its underlying components to protect against known vulnerabilities.
  • Data Backup and Disaster Recovery: Robust backup procedures and a well-defined disaster recovery plan are crucial to ensure data integrity and service continuity in case of system failures or cyberattacks.
  • User Awareness and Training: The client organization plays a role in educating users about safe online practices, such as creating strong passwords, recognizing phishing attempts, and understanding data privacy responsibilities.

Security in an LMS Online environment is a shared responsibility, requiring diligent practices from the vendor providing the platform and the organization using it.

Tip: Regularly review and audit user permissions and roles within your LMS Online to ensure employees only have access to necessary data and functions, fulfilling your part of the shared security responsibility model.

Challenges and Considerations

Despite the numerous advantages, adopting and relying on an LMS Online also presents certain challenges and considerations that organizations need to be aware of and plan for:

  • Internet Connectivity Dependence: The primary requirement is stable internet access for users. In areas with poor connectivity or for employees who travel frequently to such locations, accessing the LMS can be difficult or impossible. Some platforms offer limited offline capabilities, but these often require pre-downloading content and syncing later.
  • Bandwidth Requirements: Rich media content, particularly high-definition video or complex simulations, can consume significant bandwidth. Organizations need to ensure their network infrastructure (and potentially employees' home networks) can handle the load, especially during peak usage times.
  • Potential for Distraction: The same devices used to access the LMS Online often provide access to email, social media, and countless other web distractions. Maintaining learner focus requires engaging content design and potentially organizational guidelines on dedicated learning time.
  • Data Privacy and Security: As discussed previously, entrusting user data and potentially proprietary content to a third-party vendor requires careful vetting of the vendor's security and privacy practices and understanding data residency regulations.
  • Vendor Lock-in: Migrating large amounts of content and user data from one LMS Online platform to another can be complex and costly. Choosing the right long-term partner is important to avoid the challenges associated with switching vendors.
  • Integration Complexity: While integration is a key benefit, setting up and maintaining integrations, especially custom ones, can require technical expertise and ongoing effort.
  • Cost Management: Subscription models, particularly those based on active users, can sometimes lead to unpredictable costs if usage patterns fluctuate significantly. Careful planning and understanding of the pricing model are necessary.
  • Change Management: Successfully implementing an LMS Online requires more than just technical setup; it involves training users and administrators, promoting adoption, and potentially shifting the organizational culture (Newton et al., 2003) towards online and self-directed learning (Johnson et al., 2009).

Acknowledging and proactively addressing these considerations is crucial for a smooth implementation and maximizing the return on investment in an LMS Online.

Tip: Mitigate the challenge of internet dependency by identifying critical training modules and enabling any available offline access features your LMS Online offers, particularly for field workers or frequent travelers.

Summary

In essence, an LMS Online represents the modern standard for corporate learning technology (Bondarouk et al., 2016), leveraging internet connectivity to provide flexible, accessible, and dynamic training experiences. Defined by its web-based access and typically vendor-hosted (SaaS) model, it breaks down geographical and time-based barriers, allowing employees to learn anytime, anywhere, and on various devices. Key strengths include real-time data tracking for immediate feedback (Zhang et al., 2004) and analytics (Bersin, 2007), robust features for collaboration and social learning (Arbaugh et al., 2008), and powerful integration capabilities that connect the LMS to the broader digital workplace ecosystem. While considerations around internet dependency, security, and cost management are important, the benefits of enhanced accessibility, user experience, scalability, and continuous platform updates offered by an LMS Online make it the preferred choice for organizations aiming to build an effective and engaging learning culture in the digital age.

Bibliography
  1. Allen, E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Sloan Consortium.
    https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529930.pdf
  2. Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–21.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26520832_Does_the_Community_of_Inquiry_Framework_Predict_Outcomes_in_Online_MBA_Courses 
  3. Bates, R., Holton, E. F., & Hatala, J.-P. (2012). A revised learning transfer system inventory: Factorial replication and validation. Human Resource Development International, 15(5), 549–569.
    https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-28225-004
  4. Bersin, J. (2007, January). Trends, areas of focus and predictions for 2007 [White paper]. Brandon Hall Group.
    https://www.cedma-europe.org/newsletter%20articles/Brandon%20Hall/Bersin%20-%20Trends,%20Areas%20of%20Focus%20and%20Predictions%20for%202007%20(Jan%2007).pdf
  5. Bondarouk, T., Parry, E., & Furtmueller, E. (2016). Electronic HRM: four decades of research on adoption and consequences. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 98–131.
    https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/29089220/Bondarouk2017electronic.pdf
  6. Brown, K. G. and Charlier S.D. (2013). An integrative model of e-learning use: Leveraging theory to understand and increase usage. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 37–49.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053482212000472 
  7. Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1–32.
    https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/140
  8. Cheng, B., Wang, M., Mørch, A. I., Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (2014). Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 11, 56–72.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1747938X14
  9. Díaz-Redondo, R. P., Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., López-Escobar, J. J., & Fernández-Vilas, A. (2023). Integrating micro-learning content in traditional e-learning platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06500.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06500
  10. eLearning Journal. (2018). LMS are still popular – but will their use remain stable in the future? eLearning Journal.
    https://www.elearning-journal.com/en/2018/10/10/LMS-are-still-popular/
  11. García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Seoane Pardo, A. M. (2015). An updated review of the concept of eLearning. Tenth anniversary. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 16(1), 119–144.
    https://doaj.org/article/80224f0585ed4779bfa0df4885e74450 
  12. Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3–4), 287–299.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751601000719
  13. Harun, M. H. (2001). Integrating e-learning into the workplace. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3-4), 301-310.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751601000732
  14. Ibáñez, M. B., Di-Serio, Á., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014). Gamification for engaging computer science students in learning activities: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(3), 291–301.
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6827214
  15. Johnson, R. D., Gueutal, H., & Falbe, C. M. (2009). Technology, trainees, metacognitive activity and e-learning effectiveness. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(5), 353–364.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02683940910974125/full/html
  16. Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner–instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 292–301.
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcal.12005
  17. Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131507001029
  18. Littlejohn, Allison and Margaryan, Anoush (2014). Technology-enhanced Professional Learning. In: Billet, Stephen; Harteis, Christian and Gruber, Hans eds. International Handbook on Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1187–1212.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
  19. Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m‑learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211–1219.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131510001508
  20. Newton, R. (2003). Staff attitudes to the development and delivery of e-learning. New Library World, Vol. 104 No. 10, pp. 412-425.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03074800310504357
  21. Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014). Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 245–275.
    https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321
  22. Reams, J. (2024). The Quest for Leadership Using the Technology of MyQuest for Leader Development. Center for Transformative Leadership. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380169282
  23. Roffe, I. (2002). E-learning: engagement, enhancement and execution. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(1), 40–50.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09684880210416102/full/html
  24. Shurygin, V., Saenko, N., Zekiy, A., Klochko, E., & Kulapov, M. (2021). Learning Management Systems in Academic and Corporate Distance Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(11), 121–139.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352134234_Learning_Management_Systems_in_Academic_and_Corporate_Distance_Education
  25. Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 489–528.
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01190.x
  26. Strother, J. (2002). An assessment of the effectiveness of e-learning in corporate training programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1–17.
    https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/83
  27. Sung, M., & Lee, D. (2019). Compliance training in corporate e-learning: A gamification approach. Computers & Education, 134, 50–61.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.006
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131519301507
  28. Wang, M. (2011). Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(3), 191–205.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
  29. Wasilik, O., & Bolliger, D. U. (2009). Faculty satisfaction in the online environment: An institutional study. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 173–178.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751609000190
  30. Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr., J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75–79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200465318_can_E-learning_Replace_Classroom_Learning
Additional Information

Looking for an LMS?

MyQuest LMS is the best Learning Management System (LMS) platform for SMBs, training companies and online coaching. MyQuest LMS offers Action-Based Learning with Personalized Feedback for Optimal Skill Development (Reams, 2024). With our “Quest Builder,” you can easily create gamified training experiences structured around practical activities. Each activity is followed by personalized feedback from an expert, peers, or an AI assistant trained on your content.

Want to learn more about MyQuest LMS?

Further reading about MyQuest LMS:

Questions? Suggestions? Remarks?

Contact us at: info@myquest.co