Soft Skills Training LMS

Soft Skills Training LMS

by Ari Manor
|
Jun 03, 2025

This article, about Soft Skills Training LMS, includes the following chapters:

Soft Skills Training LMS

Bibliography

Additional Information

The article is one in a series of dozens of articles included in our Corporate LMS Guide, a guide that provides the most detailed and updated information about Corporate LMS. For other articles in the series see:

The Full Guide to Corporate LMS

Note: We strive to help you understand and implement LMS (Learning Management System) solutions in the best possible way, based on up-to-date, research-based information. To achieve this, we have included references to reliable sources and practical examples from the business world in our articles. We regularly update the content to ensure its relevance and accuracy, but it is important to personally verify that the information is accurate and that its application fits your organization’s needs and goals. If you find an error in the article or are aware of a more updated and relevant source, we would be happy if you contacted us. Good luck on your journey to improving the learning experiences in your organization!

Soft Skills Training LMS

A Soft Skills Training LMS refers to the strategic utilization of a Learning Management System to facilitate the development of crucial interpersonal, behavioral (Tennyson et al., 2010), and cognitive abilities (Arbaugh et al., 2008) often termed "soft skills." Unlike training focused on technical or procedural knowledge, developing capabilities like communication, emotional intelligence, teamwork, critical thinking, and leadership presents unique challenges for digital platforms. Therefore, a Soft Skills Training LMS isn't just about hosting content; it's about leveraging specific LMS features—often in conjunction with blended learning strategies (Hrastinski et al., 2008) —to create environments for learning behavioral models, practicing interactions, receiving nuanced feedback, and fostering self-reflection, ultimately aiming to cultivate these essential, yet often intangible, professional competencies (Allen et al., 2007).

Defining Soft Skills and Their Workplace Imperative

Soft skills, also known as power skills, essential skills, or interpersonal skills, are non-technical abilities related to how individuals work, interact with others, and manage themselves. They encompass a wide range of competencies that govern personal interactions, social situations, and approaches to work. In today's collaborative, dynamic, and often customer-facing workplaces (Chugh et al., 2018), these skills are no longer considered secondary to technical expertise but are critical drivers of individual and organizational success.

Key categories and examples of vital soft skills include:

  • Communication: Active listening, verbal articulation, written communication, presentation skills, non-verbal communication, giving and receiving feedback (Salas et al., 2001).
  • Collaboration and Teamwork: Cooperation, conflict resolution, relationship building, empathy, influencing others, negotiation.
  • Problem-Solving and Critical Thinking: Analytical reasoning, creativity, decision-making, strategic thinking, adaptability, sound judgment.
  • Leadership and Management: Motivation, delegation, coaching and mentoring, change management, strategic planning, building trust.
  • Personal Effectiveness: Time management, organization, work ethic, resilience, stress management, self-awareness, emotional intelligence (EQ), growth mindset.
  • Customer Service: Empathy, patience, positive attitude, problem resolution, communication clarity.

Organizations increasingly recognize that technical skills might get someone hired, but soft skills are essential for sustained performance, effective teamwork, strong leadership, positive customer relations, and overall career advancement. Deficiency in soft skills often underlines performance issues, team conflicts, and leadership failures.

The Unique Challenges of Training Soft Skills Digitally

Developing soft skills presents inherent challenges, particularly when relying solely on digital platforms like an LMS. These challenges stem from the nature of the skills themselves and the requirements for effective learning in this domain.

Significant challenges include:

  • Behavioral Nature: Soft skills are primarily about behavior in context, not just theoretical knowledge. True learning involves observable changes in how individuals interact and respond (Tennyson et al., 2010).
  • Nuance and Context: Effective application of soft skills is highly dependent on context, audience, and subtle social cues, which are difficult to replicate perfectly in a purely digital environment.
  • Need for Interaction and Practice: Developing skills like communication or conflict resolution requires real-time interaction, practice with others, and navigating unpredictable human responses.
  • Subjectivity of Assessment: Evaluating proficiency in soft skills is often subjective and difficult to measure objectively through automated quizzes or simple assessments. Observing behavior over time is typically required.
  • Requirement for Self-Awareness and Reflection: Meaningful development often requires deep self-reflection, understanding personal biases, and recognizing emotional triggers, which standard e-learning formats may not effectively facilitate.
  • Difficulty in Simulating Real Stakes: Practicing difficult conversations or high-stakes negotiations in a simulated environment may lack the emotional weight and pressure of real-life situations.

Acknowledging these challenges is crucial for designing effective LMS-based soft skills training programs that realistically leverage the platform's strengths while incorporating necessary complementary approaches.

Tip: Plan your soft skills training as a blended program from the start, using the LMS primarily to deliver foundational concepts, manage live practice session logistics, and host reinforcement materials.

LMS Features That Can Support Soft Skills Development

While an LMS cannot single-handedly instill soft skills, certain features, when used creatively and strategically, can significantly support the learning process, particularly when part of a blended approach (Hrastinski et al., 2008).

LMS features valuable for soft skills training include:

  • Video Hosting and Delivery: Essential for delivering expert instruction, showcasing behavioral examples (good and bad), presenting case studies, and hosting recordings of live sessions or role-plays.
  • Scenario-Based Learning/Branching Scenarios: Allowing learners to navigate realistic workplace situations (Chugh et al., 2018), make decisions requiring soft skills (e.g., how to respond to an upset colleague), and see the consequences of their choices within the LMS module.
  • Video Assessment Tools: Enabling learners to record themselves practicing skills (presentations, feedback delivery, elevator pitches) and submit via the LMS for structured review by managers, peers, or coaches using defined rubrics.
  • Discussion Forums: Facilitating peer-to-peer learning (Eom et al., 2018), sharing experiences related to soft skill challenges, discussing case studies, and providing peer feedback (when properly moderated and structured).
  • Assignment Submission: Allowing learners to submit written reflections, action plans, analyses of case studies, or summaries of practical application experiences.
  • Survey and Self-Assessment Tools: Delivering self-assessment questionnaires (e.g., related to communication style, emotional intelligence) to build self-awareness as a starting point for development.
  • Resource Libraries: Hosting curated articles, frameworks (e.g., STAR method for feedback), book summaries, TED Talks, and job aids related to specific soft skills for ongoing reference.
  • Integration with Coaching/Mentoring Platforms: Linking LMS activities with formal coaching or mentoring programs, allowing goals and resources to be shared and progress tracked centrally.
  • Calendar Integration/VILT Management: Scheduling and tracking participation in live virtual workshops or practice sessions conducted via integrated web conferencing tools.

These features provide the infrastructure to deliver foundational knowledge, facilitate some forms of practice, enable feedback loops (Sitzmann et al., 2011), and manage blended learning components (Allen et al., 2007).

Designing Effective Soft Skills Content for LMS Delivery

Creating engaging and impactful soft skills training content for an LMS requires moving beyond traditional information-heavy e-learning modules. The design must focus on engagement, reflection, and bridging the gap to real-world application.

Effective content design strategies include:

  • Storytelling and Relatable Scenarios: Using realistic narratives and characters facing common workplace challenges (Chugh et al., 2018) that require specific soft skills. This makes the learning more engaging and memorable.
  • Behavioral Modeling: Clearly demonstrating both effective and ineffective behaviors related to a skill, often through video examples. Explaining the underlying principles or frameworks.
  • Case Study Analysis: Presenting detailed case studies and prompting learners to analyze the situation, identify the soft skills involved, and propose solutions or approaches.
  • Interactive Elements: Incorporating decision points, drag-and-drop activities, or reflective questions within modules to keep learners actively engaged (Ruiz et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2004).
  • Focus on Frameworks and Models: Teaching practical models or frameworks that learners can apply (e.g., active listening techniques, structured feedback models, conflict resolution steps).
  • Prompts for Reflection: Embedding questions or short assignments that encourage learners to reflect on their own experiences, biases, or how they might apply the concepts in their work.
  • Action Planning: Concluding modules by prompting learners to create specific action plans for practicing or applying the skill back on the job.
  • Microlearning for Reinforcement: Using short videos, infographics, or quizzes delivered periodically via the LMS to reinforce key concepts and techniques over time.

Content should aim to build awareness, provide practical tools, and encourage application, rather than just presenting abstract theories.

Tip: Enhance LMS module engagement by embedding short, reflective prompts asking learners how they could apply a specific framework or technique in a recent work situation they experienced.

The Critical Role of Blended Learning

Given the challenges of developing behavioral skills digitally, a blended learning approach is almost always necessary for effective soft skills training (Allen et al., 2007; Hrastinski et al., 2008). The LMS plays a crucial role as the orchestrator and repository for the blended program (Al-Busaidi et al., 2012; Hameed et al., 2008).

How the LMS supports a blended approach:

  • Delivering Pre-Work: Hosting foundational e-learning modules, readings, or self-assessments that learners complete before attending live practice sessions, maximizing interactive time.
  • Managing Live Session Logistics: Using LMS calendar integrations and enrollment features to manage scheduling, registration, and communication for virtual instructor-led training (VILT) or even in-person workshops.
  • Hosting Recordings: Making recordings of VILT sessions available in the LMS for those who missed them or want to review.
  • Facilitating Post-Session Activities: Assigning follow-up activities, action planning assignments, or discussion forum prompts related to the live session content via the LMS.
  • Tracking Overall Program Completion: Monitoring learner progress across all components of the blend—online modules, live session attendance, assignment completion.
  • Providing a Central Resource Hub: Housing all related materials (slides, job aids, articles, recordings) in one accessible location within the LMS course structure.

The LMS provides the backbone that connects and manages the different elements of the blended learning journey for soft skills (Allen et al., 2007).

Utilizing Scenarios and Simulations Effectively

Interactive scenarios and simulations, delivered through the LMS, offer a safe space for learners to practice applying soft skills in realistic contexts without real-world consequences (Richey et al., 2023).

Effective use involves:

  • Realistic Dilemmas: Designing scenarios that mirror common workplace challenges requiring soft skills (e.g., addressing underperformance, navigating team disagreements, responding to customer complaints).
  • Branching Logic: Creating pathways where learner choices lead to different outcomes and feedback, demonstrating the impact of various communication or decision-making approaches.
  • Embedded Feedback: Providing immediate feedback within the scenario explaining why a particular choice was effective or ineffective based on soft skill principles (Sitzmann et al., 2011).
  • Focus on Decision-Making: Forcing learners to make choices that reflect judgment, empathy, communication strategy, or ethical considerations.
  • Debriefing Opportunities: Following up simulations with reflective questions, group discussions (in forums or live sessions), or assignments analyzing the experience.
  • Varying Complexity: Starting with simpler scenarios and gradually increasing the complexity and ambiguity as learners build confidence.

While not perfectly replicating reality, well-designed scenarios within the LMS provide valuable practice and insight.

Video Assessment for Practice and Feedback

Video assessment tools integrated within an LMS are particularly powerful for practicing and receiving feedback on communication-based soft skills.

The typical workflow includes:

  1. Assignment: The LMS presents a task requiring a verbal response or presentation (e.g., "Record a 2-minute response to this customer complaint," "Deliver the opening of this presentation," "Practice giving constructive feedback using the SBI model").
  2. Recording: The learner uses their webcam/phone to record their response directly within the LMS interface or uploads a pre-recorded video file.
  3. Submission: The video is submitted through the LMS.
  4. Review: A manager, coach, instructor, or peer accesses the video within the LMS grading/review tool.
  5. Feedback: The reviewer provides time-stamped comments directly on the video timeline and/or uses a structured rubric (also managed in the LMS) to assess specific aspects (clarity, tone, body language, adherence to model).
  6. Return: The feedback and score (if applicable) are returned to the learner via the LMS.

This creates a scalable process for asynchronous practice (Hrastinski et al., 2008) and personalized, specific feedback on observable behaviors.

Tip: To maximize the effectiveness of video assessments in the LMS, provide reviewers (managers or peers) with clear, concise rubrics focused on observable behaviors related to the target soft skill. Ensure reviewers are briefly trained on using the rubric consistently.

Measuring Soft Skills Development: Challenges and Approaches via LMS

Measuring the impact of soft skills training is inherently difficult, as it often involves observing long-term behavioral change (Tennyson et al., 2010). While the LMS cannot directly measure real-world behavior, it can contribute data points and manage assessment processes.

LMS-related measurement approaches include:

  • Self-Assessments: Using pre- and post-training surveys within the LMS to gauge learners' perceived confidence or understanding of specific soft skills. (Measures perception, not necessarily competence).
  • Knowledge Checks: Assessing understanding of concepts, models, and frameworks related to soft skills through quizzes in the LMS. (Measures knowledge, not application).
  • Scenario/Simulation Performance: Tracking choices and outcomes in interactive scenarios within the LMS.
  • Video Assessment Scores: Using rubric scores from manager/peer reviews of submitted practice videos.
  • 360-Degree Feedback Integration: Managing the administration of 360-feedback surveys (potentially via integration) and linking results to development plans tracked in the LMS. (Measures perceived behavior by others).
  • Tracking Completion of Development Plans: Monitoring progress against individual development goals related to soft skills documented within the LMS or integrated systems.
  • Qualitative Feedback Analysis: Analyzing comments from discussion forums or open-ended survey responses within the LMS.
  • Correlation (with caution): Attempting to correlate training completion data with business metrics like team engagement scores, customer satisfaction, or performance review data, while acknowledging many confounding factors.

Measurement requires a multi-faceted approach, combining LMS data with real-world observation and business results over time.

Tip: Use the LMS to capture pre- and post-training self-assessments of confidence, but complement this with manager surveys or short observation checklists focused on specific behavioral changes 1-3 months after the training.

Summary

A Soft Skills Training LMS leverages platform technology to support the challenging but critical task of developing interpersonal, behavioral, and cognitive competencies (Vogel-Walcutt et al., 2011). Recognizing that soft skills are behavioral and context-dependent, effective use of the LMS focuses on features like video assessment, scenario-based learning, discussion forums, and robust blended learning management (Hameed et al., 2008). Content must be engaging, scenario-driven, and focused on practical application using relatable models and frameworks. Blended learning, combining LMS-managed digital components with live practice and coaching, is essential (Hrastinski et al., 2008). While direct measurement of soft skill proficiency via LMS alone is difficult, the platform provides invaluable tools for delivering foundational knowledge, facilitating structured practice, enabling feedback loops, tracking progress against development plans, and managing the logistics of comprehensive soft skills development programs, ultimately contributing to a more effective, collaborative, and adaptable workforce.

Tip: Create dedicated discussion forums within the LMS for major soft skill topics (e.g., "Handling Difficult Conversations," "Effective Feedback"). Encourage participants to share real-world application challenges and successes for peer learning and ongoing support.
Bibliography
  1. Al‑Busaidi, K. A. (2012). Key factors to instructors’ satisfaction of learning management systems in blended learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24, 18–39.
    https://www.academia.edu/124230645/Key_factors_to_instructors_satisfaction_of_learning_management_systems_in_blended_learning
  2. Allen, E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Sloan Consortium.
    https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529930.pdf
  3. Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–21.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26520832_Does_the_Community_of_Inquiry_Framework_Predict_Outcomes_in_Online_MBA_Courses 
  4. Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1–32.
    https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/140
  5. Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U. (2018). Learning management systems in the workplace: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 189–197).
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330475653_Learning_Management_Systems_in_the_Workplace_A_Literature_Review
  6. Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. (2018). A system’s view of e-learning success model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 16(1), 42-76.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322783738_A_System's_View_of_E-Learning_Success_Model
  7. Hameed, S., Badii, A., & Cullen, A. J. (2008). Effective e-learning integration with traditional learning in a blended environment. In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228422212_Effective_E-Learning_Integration_with_Traditional_Learning_in_a_Blended_Learning_Environment 
  8. Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educational Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55.
    https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and-synchronous-elearning
  9. Reams, J. (2024). The Quest for Leadership Using the Technology of MyQuest for Leader Development. Center for Transformative Leadership. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380169282
  10. Richey, J. E., & Misiolek, N. (2023). Gamification and soft skills assessment in the development of a serious game. JMIR Serious Games, 11(1), e45436.
    https://games.jmir.org/2023/1/e45436/
  11. Roffe, I. (2002). E-learning: engagement, enhancement and execution. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(1), 40–50.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09684880210416102/full/html
  12. Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 81(3), 207–212.
    https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/abstract/2006/03000/the_impact_of_e_learning_in_medical_education.2.aspx 
  13. Salas, E. and Cannon‐Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499.
    https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471
  14. Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta‐analysis of self‐regulated learning in work‐related training and educational attainment. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 405–449.
    https://europepmc.org/article/med/21401218
  15. Tennyson, R. D. (2010). Historical reflection on learning theories and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 93–95.
    https://www.cedtech.net/download/historical-reflection-on-learning-theories-and-instructional-design-5958.pdf
  16. Vogel‐Walcutt, J. J., Gebrim, J. B., Bowers, C., Carper, T. M., & Nicholson, D. (2011). Cognitive load theory vs. constructivist approaches: which best leads to efficient, deep learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 133-145.
    https://hillkm.com/EDUC_715/Unit_2/vogel_walcutt_et_al_2011.pdf
  17. Wang, M. (2011). Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(3), 191–205.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
  18. Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr., J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75–79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200465318_can_E-learning_Replace_Classroom_Learning
Additional Information

Looking for an LMS?

MyQuest LMS is the best Learning Management System (LMS) platform for SMBs, training companies and online coaching. MyQuest LMS offers Action-Based Learning with Personalized Feedback for Optimal Skill Development (Reams, 2024). With our “Quest Builder,” you can easily create gamified training experiences structured around practical activities. Each activity is followed by personalized feedback from an expert, peers, or an AI assistant trained on your content.

Want to learn more about MyQuest LMS?

Further reading about MyQuest LMS:

Questions? Suggestions? Remarks?

Contact us at: info@myquest.co