How to Choose a Corporate LMS?

How to Choose a Corporate LMS?

by Ari Manor
|
Jun 03, 2025

This article, about How to Choose a Corporate LMS, includes the following chapters:

How to Choose a Corporate LMS?

Bibliography

Additional Information

The article is one in a series of dozens of articles included in our Corporate LMS Guide, a guide that provides the most detailed and updated information about Corporate LMS. For other articles in the series see:

The Full Guide to Corporate LMS

Note: We strive to help you understand and implement LMS (Learning Management System) solutions in the best possible way, based on up-to-date, research-based information. To achieve this, we have included references to reliable sources and practical examples from the business world in our articles. We regularly update the content to ensure its relevance and accuracy, but it is important to personally verify that the information is accurate and that its application fits your organization’s needs and goals. If you find an error in the article or are aware of a more updated and relevant source, we would be happy if you contacted us. Good luck on your journey to improving the learning experiences in your organization!

How to Choose a Corporate LMS?

In an ever-changing business landscape, selecting the right Learning Management System (LMS) can be a pivotal factor in cultivating a culture of continuous development and success. The process demands a holistic view—one that weighs organizational objectives against factors like cost, flexibility (Wasilik & Bolliger, 2009), scalability, user experience, and data security. Whether you’re aiming to streamline onboarding, enhance compliance training, or upskill your workforce, choosing an LMS that aligns with your core needs ensures maximum return on investment (Govindasamy et al., 2001). 

This article explores key criteria for corporate LMS selection, how to accurately define your organization’s unique requirements, the comparative benefits of on-premises versus cloud-based solutions (Ekuase-Anwansedo et al., 2021), and strategies for securing the executive sponsorship that drives project momentum (Salas et al., 2001; Littlejohn et al., 2014).

Key Criteria for Corporate LMS

When determining which LMS will best serve your organization, certain criteria consistently rise to the top. These considerations help filter out solutions that might fall short in critical areas and guide you toward a platform capable of driving meaningful learning outcomes.

Tip: Host a discovery workshop with HR, L&D, IT, and business leaders before diving into LMS comparisons. Align on organizational priorities, pain points, and future training goals (Govindasamy et al., 2001) to ensure you're not just buying software—you’re investing in a solution that supports long-term growth.

Here are the most important criteria to consider:

  1. Ease of Use
    A user-friendly interface increases adoption rates for both learners (Lee et al., 2013; Mohammadi et al., 2015) and administrators (Brown et al., 2013). Complex, unintuitive systems often struggle to gain traction, reducing engagement and limiting the overall impact of your training initiatives (eLearning Journal, 2018).
  2. Customization and Scalability
    As your organization grows or training programs become more sophisticated, your LMS must adapt accordingly. Look for platforms that accommodate expanded user bases, offer modular features (Bersin, 2007), and easily integrate with emerging technologies like AI-driven analytics or virtual reality (VR) simulations (Sharma et al., 2008).
  3. Robust Reporting and Analytics
    Quantifiable insights—such as completion rates, assessment scores, and time-to-competency—are crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of your learning efforts (Eom et al., 2018). An LMS with detailed analytics dashboards empowers you to make data-driven decisions about content updates, training gaps, and learner engagement.
    • Tip: Don’t just look for pretty dashboards—look for actionable insights. The best LMS analytics go beyond tracking completions and help you uncover skill gaps, optimize content, and link learning to performance outcomes that matter to your business.
  4. Mobile Compatibility
    In today’s remote and hybrid work environments, employees expect the flexibility to learn anytime, anywhere (Shurygin et al., 2021). Responsive design and dedicated mobile apps ensure that your workforce can access training resources on multiple devices and platforms without compromising user experience (Liu et al., 2010).
  5. Compliance and Security
    If your industry faces rigorous regulatory requirements (e.g., HIPAA, GDPR), your LMS must incorporate data encryption and role-based access control while adhering to recognized security standards. Confirm how the vendor handles data backups, disaster recovery, and periodic system audits.
  6. Integration Capabilities
    For seamless workflows, your LMS should integrate readily with existing HRIS, CRM, or project management tools. This not only helps in automating administrative tasks like enrolling new hires but also facilitates advanced reporting by merging multiple data streams into a unified dashboard (Govindasamy, 2001).
  7. Vendor Reputation and Support
    A top-tier LMS vendor should provide ongoing training and technical support. Investigate customer testimonials, review platform reliability metrics, and examine case studies relevant to your industry. Service-level agreements (SLAs) that specify uptime guarantees and support response times can be decisive when distinguishing between similar solutions.

How to Characterize Your Organization Needs?

Before comparing specific LMS solutions, it is critical to map out the distinct characteristics and demands of your organization. Taking the time to characterize these needs fosters a more targeted search process and leads to an LMS that truly complements your workflow and training objectives.

Here are some aspects to consider:

  1. Learning Objectives and Scope
    Start by defining the scope of your training programs. Determine whether your primary goal is compliance, leadership development (Reams, 2024), onboarding, upskilling, or customer training. A clear sense of purpose narrows the range of suitable LMS features.
  2. Organizational Structure
    A global enterprise with multiple business units might need multi-language support and complex user hierarchies, whereas a small startup may benefit from a nimble, easily managed platform. Additionally, consider the proportion of desk-based versus field-based employees and whether synchronous or asynchronous training formats will dominate (Hrastinski et al., 2008).
  3. Resource Availability
    Evaluate the bandwidth of your IT, HR, and L&D teams to implement and maintain the LMS. If you have limited technical capacity, you may need a system with robust vendor support or more user-friendly administrative tools.
  4. Content Complexity
    Characterize the kind of content you plan to create. Will it be microlearning modules (Díaz-Redondo et al., 2023), video-based lessons, or interactive simulations? Some LMSs excel at specific formats. For instance, if your courses heavily feature immersive elements or advanced testing strategies, certain platforms will stand out.
  5. Long-Term Vision
    The LMS you choose should align with where you see your organization in three to five years. If future plans include global expansion, advanced analytics, or specialized content formats (e.g., AR/VR), factor these possibilities into your requirements now rather than switching platforms later.
    • Tip: Future-proof your LMS by checking for AI-readiness, AR/VR capabilities, and support for new learning formats—even if they’re not in your roadmap today. Choosing a system with room to grow avoids costly replatforming in the future.

Comparing On-Premises vs. Cloud-Based LMS Solutions

One of the most significant decisions in LMS selection is determining whether to opt for on-premises or cloud-based deployment (Ekuase-Anwansedo et al., 2021). Each model carries advantages and limitations, and the right choice will hinge on your organization’s infrastructure, budget, and security posture.

Here’s how the two compare:

  1. On-Premises LMS
    1. Advantages
      1. Greater control over data and security protocols, making it preferable for industries with strict data compliance laws.
      2. Customization options may be more extensive, allowing for tailored integration with proprietary systems.
    2. Drawbacks
      1. High upfront costs for hardware, installation, and ongoing maintenance.
      2. Scalability can be more challenging, requiring physical upgrades and additional IT resources.
      3. Updates or feature enhancements often take longer to deploy, as they depend on internal processes.
  1. Cloud-Based LMS
    1. Advantages
      1. Lower initial costs and faster deployment, with updates and new features often rolled out automatically by the vendor.
      2. Easily scalable, accommodating fluctuations in user numbers or training intensity.
      3. Reduced IT workload, as server maintenance and security patches are typically handled by the provider (Ekuase-Anwansedo et al., 2021).
    2. Drawbacks
      1. Less direct control over server environments, potentially a concern for companies with high-security or proprietary data.
      2. Ongoing subscription fees can accumulate over the long term.
      3. Organizations may have to rely on vendor security measures, so choose a reputable provider with strong data protection credentials.

In many modern contexts, cloud-based solutions dominate due to their flexibility (Wasilik & Bolliger, 2009; Sun et al., 2008), cost efficiency (Appana et al., 2008), and rapid deployment. Nonetheless, for organizations with specific compliance mandates or specialized infrastructure needs, on-premises setups remain viable and sometimes preferable.

Strategies for Securing Executive Buy-In During LMS Evaluation

Even if you identify the perfect LMS for your organization, success is not guaranteed without support from top leadership. Executives control the budget, resources, and policy alignments that facilitate a smooth LMS rollout.

Tip: When building your executive pitch, include internal use cases from past training challenges. Show how the right LMS could have prevented delays, improved compliance, or reduced onboarding time. Real examples carry more weight than hypothetical gains.


Here are some proven strategies for gaining their sponsorship:

  1. Speak Their Language
    Emphasize key performance indicators (KPIs) that resonate with executive concerns—cost savings, return on investment (ROI), reduced employee turnover, improved compliance metrics, or enhanced customer satisfaction (Wang, 2011). Position the LMS as a strategic lever for broader corporate objectives.
  2. Present a Solid Business Case
    Use clear financial models to demonstrate how the LMS can pay for itself. Factor in reductions in travel costs for in-person training, minimized administrative overhead, and productivity gains from quicker onboarding (Wang et al., 2011). Including industry benchmarks in your analysis adds credibility.
  3. Highlight Quick Wins
    Propose a pilot program or proof of concept to showcase immediate benefits like higher engagement or faster skill acquisition. Executives respond well to tangible, short-term successes that validate the platform’s long-term promise.
  4. Show Industry Comparisons
    If competitors are leveraging advanced training platforms to upskill their teams and gain market share, mention these insights. Demonstrating how effective learning initiatives can become a competitive edge often resonates strongly with upper management (Littlejohn et al., 2014).
  5. Leverage Cross-Functional Support
    Secure endorsements from multiple departments—IT, HR, and department heads—to illustrate a shared vision and wide-based demand. Such an alignment reassures executives that the investment has been thoroughly vetted across the organization.


By following these strategies, you not only ensure the financial resources for an LMS but also establish a foundation of stakeholder commitment and enthusiasm that drives adoption.

Evaluating LMS Vendors’ Product Roadmaps

A product roadmap reflects a vendor’s long-term commitment to innovation, stability, and customer-centric enhancements. By scrutinizing an LMS vendor’s roadmap, you gain insight into how frequently they release updates, their strategic direction, and the features they prioritize.

Below are key aspects to evaluate when assessing a vendor's product roadmap:

  1. Alignment with Future Goals
    1. Assess how well upcoming features align with your organization’s projected needs—such as AI-enabled analytics, AR/VR training, or advanced role-based access control.
    2. Look for clear timelines, beta testing opportunities, or pilot programs that let you evaluate potential functionalities before they roll out to the entire user base.
  2. Frequency of Updates
    1. Vendors that consistently roll out patches, minor improvements, and major version upgrades are generally more agile and responsive to market demands.
    2. Infrequent updates can leave the platform lagging behind competitors, potentially compromising user experience and security (Wang et al., 2011).
  3. Customer Feedback Mechanisms
    1. A transparent roadmap indicates the vendor actively listens to user feedback. Platforms that incorporate community requests and suggestions often build features that address real-world pain points (Arbaugh et al., 2008).
    2. Engage in user forums or vendor-hosted webinars to learn about upcoming releases and understand how well the vendor implements user-driven suggestions.
  4. Vendor Stability
    1. Long-term viability is paramount. Investigate financial stability, management changes, or mergers/acquisitions that might impact product development.
    2. A robust vendor often has a track record of stable leadership, positive customer retention rates, and transparent communication during significant corporate shifts.

Comparing Social and Collaborative Learning Features

Social and collaborative learning functionalities play a pivotal role in modern LMS adoption, reflecting the evolving nature of knowledge-sharing within organizations. These features encourage peer interactions, knowledge exchange, and a sense of community among learners (Noe et al., 2014).

Here are the most impactful social and collaborative features to consider:

  1. Discussion Forums and Chat
    1. An effective LMS should enable employees to discuss course materials (Kang et al., 2013), share industry insights, and problem-solve collaboratively (Littlejohn et al., 2014).
    2. Some platforms integrate external messaging apps or embed social media-style feeds to maintain a more informal, engaging environment (García-Peñalvo et al., 2015).
  2. Group Projects and Assignments
    1. Look for tools that allow teams to work together on case studies, reports, or presentations. This fosters communication, critical thinking (Bullen et al., 1998), and shared accountability.
    2. Built-in project management features—like task assignment, file sharing, or progress tracking—can further streamline collaborative efforts.
  3. Peer-to-Peer Feedback
    1. Reviewing others’ work or providing peer assessments can enhance learning retention and maintain continuous improvement.
    2. Systems that incorporate rating tools or recognition badges encourage constructive feedback loops (Sitzmann et al., 2011) and friendly competition.
  4. Expert Mentoring and Coaching
    1. Some LMS platforms pair learners with subject-matter experts or automate mentor-mentee matching based on roles or skills.
    2. Real-time coaching, Q&A sessions, or one-on-one support helps learners tackle issues promptly and fosters continuous development across the organization.

The Importance of Gamification and AI Personalization

Gamification techniques (Sitzmann, 2011b) and AI-driven personalization (Abaricia et al., 2023) have moved from buzzwords to core differentiators in the L&D landscape. By tapping into intrinsic motivators like competition and achievement, and customizing content to individual needs (Alonso et al., 2008), these features can dramatically enhance engagement and skill retention (Richey et al., 2023).

Here are the most valuable gamification and AI personalization capabilities to look for:

  1. Gamification Elements
    1. Points, badges, and leaderboards stimulate learners to complete modules, earn certifications, and surpass peer achievements (Silic et al., 2020).
    2. Scenario-based simulations or interactive quizzes transform passive learning into an immersive, rewarding experience (Roffe et al., 2002).
  2. Adaptive Learning Paths
    1. AI algorithms can analyze performance data to suggest relevant modules or content (Cheng et al., 2014), ensuring each learner receives a personalized experience (Alonso et al., 2008).
    2. This adaptive approach (Sharma et al., 2008) addresses skill gaps more effectively and often accelerates time-to-competency (Eom et al., 2018).
  3. Predictive Analytics
    1. Some LMS platforms use machine learning to predict which learners might need intervention, allowing instructors or managers to provide targeted coaching.
    2. Predictive analytics can also identify popular content or high-engagement features, guiding future curriculum design.
  4. Continuous Motivation
    1. Gamification and personalization work hand in hand to keep learners consistently engaged. As users progress, dynamic rewards or content recommendations sustain interest throughout long-term training initiatives (Ibáñez et al., 2014).
    2. Coupled with social features, gamification can spark friendly rivalry or cooperative problem-solving, further boosting engagement.

Risk Management: Backup, Disaster Recovery, and Data Privacy

Data security and risk management have grown increasingly vital as corporate training environments accumulate sensitive information—ranging from personal learner data to proprietary training materials. An LMS that employs robust backup, disaster recovery, and privacy protocols protects both your organization and your employees.

Here are essential risk management capabilities to evaluate in an LMS:

  1. Regular Automated Backups
    1. Confirm that backups occur frequently enough to minimize data loss. Some vendors offer daily or hourly snapshots stored in multiple locations for redundancies.
    2. Know how quickly you can restore systems in case of outages or data corruption.
  2. Disaster Recovery Plan
    1. Evaluate the vendor’s disaster recovery strategy to ensure minimal downtime. In high-stakes environments, an SLA guaranteeing near-instant failover to backup servers is particularly critical.
    2. Request documentation detailing how quickly the LMS can resume operations after an outage, who handles restoration tasks, and how communications will be managed.
  3. Data Privacy Compliance
    1. Understand regulations like GDPR, CCPA, or industry-specific mandates such as HIPAA for healthcare. Your chosen LMS must safeguard personal data and offer transparent, user-friendly data management policies.
    2. Role-based access control and robust encryption (both at rest and in transit) further reduce the risk of unauthorized data exposure (Govindasamy, 2001).
  4. Audit Trails and Monitoring
    1. Systems with comprehensive audit logs let admins track user activities, detect suspicious behavior, and trace errors quickly.
    2. Real-time monitoring and automated alerts for anomalies (e.g., unusual login attempts) help you proactively address security threats.

Calculating the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for LMS Investments

While pricing tables often highlight subscription fees or perpetual licenses, these line items rarely tell the full financial story of an LMS. A thorough TCO calculation should encompass all direct and indirect costs over the lifecycle of the platform.

Tip: Even a feature-rich LMS can fail without user adoption (Mohammadi et al., 2015). Be sure to factor in training, onboarding, and support resources when calculating TCO. A low-cost LMS that no one uses is more expensive than a premium system that drives engagement and performance.

Here are the key TCO components to calculate before making a decision:

  1. Licensing and Subscription Fees
    1. Cloud-based LMS platforms typically charge monthly or annual subscriptions, often tiered by user count. On-premises solutions might have higher upfront fees but lower ongoing costs.
    2. Factor in possible overage charges if you exceed user limits.
  2. Implementation and Customization
    1. Budget for installation, data migration, integration with existing tools, and any custom feature development. Complexity or specialized requirements can significantly raise initial costs.
  3. Maintenance and Upgrades
    1. Even if a platform includes free updates, you may incur expenses for testing and rolling out new versions, training staff on new features, or adjusting integrations (Wang et al., 2011).
    2. For on-premises solutions, hardware and server upkeep, software patches, and additional IT overhead may apply.
  4. Support and Training
    1. Premium support plans, such as 24/7 helplines or dedicated account managers, can come at a premium. Evaluate whether advanced support is essential for your organizational structure.
    2. Ongoing administrator training ensures your team can make the most of new features, but it also adds to yearly or quarterly expenses.
  5. User Adoption and Opportunity Costs
    1. If your workforce struggles with a steep learning curve or poor UX, hidden costs emerge in the form of lost productivity or reduced training effectiveness.
    2. A user-friendly LMS (Brown et al., 2013) with strong support resources can mitigate these inefficiencies, maximizing returns on your investment.

Summary

The journey to selecting an optimal corporate LMS starts with a clear understanding of your organization’s unique needs and learning objectives. By applying core criteria—like ease of use (Stephens et al., 2023), scalability, robust analytics, and integration capabilities—you can refine the field of potential solutions. Carefully evaluate whether an on-premises or cloud-based model is the best fit for your security posture, budget, and technical environment. Throughout the process, internal consensus and executive sponsorship remain paramount, ensuring the chosen platform receives the necessary backing to thrive. Ultimately, a well-chosen LMS transcends basic training delivery, embedding itself within your corporate strategy and propelling a culture of continuous learning, performance improvement, and innovation.

Bibliography
  1. Abaricia, C. P., & Delos Santos, M. L. C. (2023). Enhancing e-learning systems through learning management system (LMS) technologies: Reshaping the learner experience. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12354.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12354
  2. Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2008). Learning objects, learning objectives and learning design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 389–400.
    https://oa.upm.es/2424/1/INVE_MEM_2008_55924.pdf
  3. Appana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(1), 5–22.
    https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22909/
  4. Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–21.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26520832_Does_the_Community_of_Inquiry_Framework_Predict_Outcomes_in_Online_MBA_Courses 
  5. Bersin, J. (2007, January). Trends, areas of focus and predictions for 2007 [White paper]. Brandon Hall Group.
    https://www.cedma-europe.org/newsletter%20articles/Brandon%20Hall/Bersin%20-%20Trends,%20Areas%20of%20Focus%20and%20Predictions%20for%202007%20(Jan%2007).pdf
  6. Brown, K. G. and Charlier S.D. (2013). An integrative model of e-learning use: Leveraging theory to understand and increase usage. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 37–49.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053482212000472 
  7. Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1–32.
    https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/140
  8. Cheng, B., Wang, M., Mørch, A. I., Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (2014). Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 11, 56–72.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1747938X14
  9. Díaz-Redondo, R. P., Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., López-Escobar, J. J., & Fernández-Vilas, A. (2023). Integrating micro-learning content in traditional e-learning platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06500.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06500
  10. Ekuase-Anwansedo, A., & Smith, A. (2021). Effect of cloud-based learning management systems on the implementation process: Faculty and student perspectives.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10522
  11. eLearning Journal. (2018). LMS are still popular – but will their use remain stable in the future? eLearning Journal.
    https://www.elearning-journal.com/en/2018/10/10/LMS-are-still-popular/
  12. Elmashhara, M. G., De Cicco, R., Silva, S. C., Hammerschmidt, M., & Levi Silva, M. (2023). How gamifying AI shapes customer motivation, engagement, and purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 41(1), 134–150.
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/mar.21912
  13. Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. (2018). A system’s view of e-learning success model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 16(1), 42-76.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322783738_A_System's_View_of_E-Learning_Success_Model
  14. García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Seoane Pardo, A. M. (2015). An updated review of the concept of eLearning. Tenth anniversary. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 16(1), 119–144.
    https://doaj.org/article/80224f0585ed4779bfa0df4885e74450 
  15. Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3–4), 287–299.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751601000719
  16. Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educational Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55.
    https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and-synchronous-elearning
  17. Ibáñez, M. B., Di-Serio, Á., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014). Gamification for engaging computer science students in learning activities: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(3), 291–301.
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6827214
  18. Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner–instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 292–301.
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcal.12005
  19. Lee, Y., Hsieh, Y. C., & Chen, Y. H. (2013). An investigation of employees’ use of e-learning systems: Applying the technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 173–189.
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144929X.2011.577190 
  20. Littlejohn, Allison and Margaryan, Anoush (2014). Technology-enhanced Professional Learning. In: Billet, Stephen; Harteis, Christian and Gruber, Hans eds. International Handbook on Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1187–1212.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
  21. Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m‑learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211–1219.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131510001508
  22. Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359–374. (Posted revision 2018).
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563214003225
  23. Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014). Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 245–275.
    https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321
  24. Reams, J. (2024). The Quest for Leadership Using the Technology of MyQuest for Leader Development. Center for Transformative Leadership. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380169282
  25. Richey, J. E., & Misiolek, N. (2023). Gamification and soft skills assessment in the development of a serious game. JMIR Serious Games, 11(1), e45436.
    https://games.jmir.org/2023/1/e45436/
  26. Roffe, I. (2002). E-learning: engagement, enhancement and execution. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(1), 40–50.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09684880210416102/full/html
  27. Salas, E. and Cannon‐Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499.
    https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471
  28. Sharma, R., Gupta, P., & Kumar, M. (2008). A framework for adaptive e-learning systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 112–119). IEEE.
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4670262
  29. Shurygin, V., Saenko, N., Zekiy, A., Klochko, E., & Kulapov, M. (2021). Learning Management Systems in Academic and Corporate Distance Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(11), 121–139.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352134234_Learning_Management_Systems_in_Academic_and_Corporate_Distance_Education
  30. Silic, M., & Lowry, P. B. (2020). Using design-science based gamification to improve organizational security training and compliance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(1), 129–161.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334960046_Using_Design-Science_Based_Gamification_to_Improve_Organizational_Security_Training_and_Compliance
  31. Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 489–528.
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01190.x
  32. Stephens, C. C. (2023). Employees’ acceptance of learning management system e-learning influence over organizational security training (Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest LLC).
    https://www.proquest.com/openview/6010c6536deb8f380f370ccb72c39ce9/1
  33. Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131506001874
  34. Wang, M. (2011). Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(3), 191–205.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
  35. Wang, M., Vogel, D., & Ran, W. (2011). Creating a performance-oriented e-learning environment: A design science approach. Information & Management, 48(7), 260–269.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378720611000565
  36. Wasilik, O., & Bolliger, D. U. (2009). Faculty satisfaction in the online environment: An institutional study. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 173–178. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751609000190
Additional Information

Looking for an LMS?

MyQuest LMS is the best Learning Management System (LMS) platform for SMBs, training companies and online coaching. MyQuest LMS offers Action-Based Learning with Personalized Feedback for Optimal Skill Development (Reams, 2024). With our “Quest Builder,” you can easily create gamified training experiences structured around practical activities. Each activity is followed by personalized feedback from an expert, peers, or an AI assistant trained on your content.

Want to learn more about MyQuest LMS?

Further reading about MyQuest LMS:

Questions? Suggestions? Remarks?

Contact us at: info@myquest.co