Corporate LMS Solutions

Corporate LMS Solutions

by Ari Manor
|
June 03, 2025

This article, about Corporate LMS Solutions, includes the following chapters:

Corporate LMS Solutions

Bibliography

Additional Information

The article is one in a series of dozens of articles included in our Corporate LMS Guide, a guide that provides the most detailed and updated information about Corporate LMS. For other articles in the series see:

The Full Guide to Corporate LMS

Note: We strive to help you understand and implement LMS (Learning Management System) solutions in the best possible way, based on up-to-date, research-based information. To achieve this, we have included references to reliable sources and practical examples from the business world in our articles. We regularly update the content to ensure its relevance and accuracy, but it is important to personally verify that the information is accurate and that its application fits your organization’s needs and goals. If you find an error in the article or are aware of a more updated and relevant source, we would be happy if you contacted us. Good luck on your journey to improving the learning experiences in your organization!

Corporate LMS Solutions

In today’s dynamic business environment, organizations are increasingly turning to Corporate Learning Management System (LMS) solutions to streamline employee training, enhance professional development, and maintain a competitive edge. A Corporate LMS is not just a tool for delivering courses; it’s a comprehensive solution designed to manage, track, and optimize learning experiences across the organization. Whether for onboarding new hires, ensuring compliance, upskilling employees, or fostering leadership development, the right LMS solution can significantly impact business performance.

This part of our Corporate LMS guide explores the key components of Corporate LMS solutions, their features, benefits, and how organizations can select the right LMS to meet their unique learning and development needs.

What Are Corporate LMS Solutions?

Corporate LMS solutions are software platforms designed to deliver, manage, and monitor training programs within organizations. These systems go beyond simple content delivery — they integrate with other business tools, provide advanced analytics, and support various learning formats, including e-learning, blended learning (Hameed et al., 2008), mobile learning, and more.

A comprehensive LMS solution helps organizations:

  • Standardize training across multiple departments and locations
  • Automate administrative tasks such as course assignments and certification tracking
  • Personalize learning experiences based on employee roles and skill gaps
    • Tip: Use AI-driven learning recommendations to tailor course suggestions for employees, ensuring they receive relevant training based on their job responsibilities and performance data (Lee et al., 2013).
  • Measure training effectiveness through robust reporting and analytics

Key Features of Corporate LMS Solutions

To meet the diverse needs of modern businesses, Corporate LMS solutions offer a range of features designed to enhance learning experience and improve operational efficiency. Some of the most critical features include:

a. Course Management and Content Delivery

  • Supports multiple content formats (videos, PDFs, SCORM, xAPI, etc.)
  • Enables easy creation, scheduling, and management of courses
  • Facilitates interactive learning (Strother et al., 2002) through quizzes, simulations, gamifications and business games (Richey et al., 2023)
    • Tip: Incorporate leaderboards, achievement badges, and scenario-based challenges (Roffe et al., 2002) to keep learners motivated and enhance knowledge retention.

b. User and Role Management

  • Provides role-based access for learners, instructors, and administrators
  • Supports customized learning paths based on job roles, skills, and career goals

c. Tracking and Reporting

  • Monitors learner progress, course completion rates, and assessment scores
  • Generates detailed analytics to evaluate training effectiveness and ROI (Kirkpatrick et al., 2006)
  • Includes compliance tracking to ensure regulatory training requirements are met

d. Mobile Learning Support

  • Offers mobile-friendly platforms for learning anytime, anywhere
  • Supports offline learning with content that can be accessed without an internet connection

e. Integration Capabilities

  • Seamlessly integrates with HR systems, CRM software, and collaboration tools (e.g., Microsoft Teams, Slack)
  • Automates data synchronization for streamlined workflows

f. Certification and Compliance Management

  • Automates the issuance of certificates upon course completion
  • Tracks certifications and sends reminders for renewals, critical in industries with regulatory requirements

g. Personalization and Adaptive Learning

  • Uses AI-driven recommendations to personalize content based on learner behavior and performance (Abaricia et al., 2023)
  • Supports microlearning modules for bite-sized, focused training sessions (Díaz-Redondo et al., 2023)

Types of Corporate LMS Solutions

Corporate LMS solutions can be categorized based on deployment models, learning delivery methods, and target audiences:

a. Corporate LMS Solutions Based on Deployment Models

  • Cloud-Based LMS: Hosted on the vendor’s servers, offering easy access, scalability, and lower upfront costs (Nguyen et al., 2023; Appana et al., 2008).
  • On-Premises LMS: Installed on the organization’s local servers, providing greater control over data and security but requiring higher maintenance.
  • Hybrid LMS: Combines cloud and on-premises features, offering flexibility for organizations with specific data security requirements.

b. Corporate LMS Solutions Based on Learning Delivery

  • E-Learning LMS: Focuses on online courses, ideal for remote teams or distributed workforces.
  • Blended Learning LMS: Supports both online and in-person training, combining the best of traditional classroom learning with digital content (Hameed et al., 2008; Allen et al., 2007).
  • Mobile LMS: Optimized for smartphones and tablets (Ifenthaler et al., 2013), supporting learning on-the-go (Liu et al., 2010).

c. Corporate LMS Solutions Based on Target Audience

  • Internal LMS: Designed for employee training within the organization.
  • Extended Enterprise LMS: Used to train external stakeholders such as customers, partners, and vendors.

Benefits of Corporate LMS Solutions

Implementing a Corporate LMS solution offers numerous advantages that go beyond just cost savings. Here are some key benefits:

a. Improved Training Efficiency: 

LMS solutions automate administrative tasks such as course enrollment, tracking, and reporting, freeing up time for HR and L&D teams to focus on strategic initiatives.

b. Consistent Learning Experiences

Organizations can deliver standardized training across all locations, ensuring every employee receives the same high-quality content (Eom et al., 2018), regardless of geography.

c. Enhanced Employee Engagement

Interactive features like gamification, social learning (Cheng et al., 2011), and personalized content keep learners motivated (Cheng et al., 2014; Littlejohn et al., 2014), increasing course completion rates and knowledge retention (Strother et al., 2002).

d. Scalability and Flexibility

LMS solutions can scale to support growing workforces, new business units, or international operations, adapting easily to changing organizational needs.

e. Compliance and Risk Management

Automated compliance tracking ensures employees meet regulatory training requirements, reducing legal risks and avoiding costly penalties.

Tip: Set up automated renewal reminders and periodic knowledge checks within the LMS to ensure employees stay up to date with industry regulations.

f. Data-Driven Decision Making

Advanced analytics provide insights into learner performance, training effectiveness, and skill gaps, enabling data-driven decisions for continuous improvement.

Tip: Regularly analyze LMS reports to link training efforts to measurable business outcomes, such as improved employee productivity, higher customer satisfaction, or reduced operational errors.

g. Cost Savings

By reducing the need for physical training materials, travel expenses, and instructor-led sessions, an LMS significantly lowers training costs (Appana et al., 2008).

How to Choose the Right Corporate LMS Solution

Selecting the right LMS is a strategic decision that requires careful consideration of organizational goals, budget, and user needs. Here’s a step-by-step guide to choosing the best LMS solution:

Step 1: Define Training Objectives

Identify what you want to achieve with the LMS:

  • Is it for employee onboarding, compliance, leadership development, or all of the above?

    Common objectives often include:
  • Onboarding Efficiency
  • Regulatory Compliance
  • Product Education
  • Soft Skills Training
  • Leadership Development
  • Sales Enablement
  • Cultural and Diversity Awareness
  • Mentorship and Coaching Programs
  • Continuous Improvement (Kaizen)
  • Succession Planning
  • Will it support internal staff, external partners, or both?

    Target audiences for Corporate LMS often include some of the following:
  • New Hires
  • Frontline Employees
  • Mid-Level Managers
  • Senior Executives
  • Interns or Trainees
  • Remote or Distributed Teams
  • Channel Partners or Resellers
  • Vendors or Suppliers
  • Customers or End-Users
  • Volunteers (in Non-Profit Settings)

Step 2: Assess Key Features

Determine which features are critical for your organization:

  • Do you need mobile access for remote teams? (Shurygin et al., 2021)
  • Is integration with existing HR or CRM systems essential?
  • Are advanced analytics and reporting tools required?


Learning requirements may also, for example, include:

  • Skill Gap Identification
  • Employee Retention and Satisfaction
  • Multi-Lingual or Multi-Regional Training
  • Cross-Functional Collaboration
  • Remote Workforce Inclusion
  • Data-Driven Learning and Analytics
  • Professional Certifications and Licenses
  • Real-Time Performance Support
  • Gamification and Engagement Strategies
  • Global Standardization of Training

Step 3: Consider Scalability and Flexibility

Choose an LMS that can grow with your organization:

  • Will it support future training needs as your company expands?
    • Tip: Choose an LMS with modular functionality that allows easy expansion, enabling businesses to add new features, users, or training programs as they scale.
  • Does it offer customization options to fit your brand and learning culture? (Newton et al., 2003)

Step 4: Evaluate User Experience (UX)

A user-friendly interface is critical for adoption (eLearning Journal, 2018; Brown et al., 2013):

  • Is the platform intuitive for both learners and administrators? (Sun et al., 2008)
  • Does it support accessibility standards for diverse learners?

Step 5: Budget and Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

Consider both upfront and ongoing costs:

  • What’s the pricing model (subscription-based, per-user, or one-time license)?
  • Are there additional costs for implementation, customization, or support?

Step 6: Request Demos and Trials

Before making a final decision:

  • Request live demos to see the LMS in action.
    For example, to learn about MyQuest LMS book a demo here
  • Take advantage of free trials to evaluate functionality and ease of use.

Step 7: Check Vendor Support and Reputation

  • Does the LMS provider offer reliable customer support?
  • Look for case studies, client testimonials, and industry reviews.

Popular Corporate LMS Solutions in the Market

Several LMS solutions dominate the corporate landscape due to their robust features and scalability. Here are some of the top choices:

a. SAP Litmos

  • Cloud-based LMS with strong compliance management features
  • Ideal for large enterprises with global training needs
  • Offers extensive integration with third-party applications

b. Cornerstone OnDemand

  • Comprehensive talent management suite with advanced learning analytics
  • Supports personalized learning paths and social learning features
  • Scalable for businesses of all sizes

c. Docebo

  • AI-powered LMS with strong focus on automation and personalized learning
  • Flexible API for seamless integration with other enterprise tools
  • Excellent for extended enterprise training (partners, clients, vendors)

d. TalentLMS

  • User-friendly, cost-effective solution ideal for SMBs
  • Supports gamification, mobile learning, and custom branding
  • Quick to set up with minimal technical expertise required

e. Moodle (Corporate Version)

  • Open-source LMS with high customization capabilities
  • Strong community support and flexibility (Wasilik & Bolliger, 2009) for niche training needs
  • Ideal for organizations that require complete control over the platform

f. MyQuest

  • Engagement-driven LMS focused on experiential and active learning
  • Ideal for organizations seeking to boost learner participation and knowledge retention

Features interactive missions, real-time coaching, and strong mobile learning support

Challenges of Implementing Corporate LMS Solutions

While Corporate LMS solutions offer numerous benefits, organizations may face certain challenges during implementation (Chugh et al., 2018; Newton et al., 2003):

a. Resistance to Change

Employees accustomed to traditional training methods may resist adopting new technologies. Change management strategies and effective communication are key to overcoming this barrier.

b. Integration Complexities

Integrating the LMS with existing HR, CRM, or ERP systems can be technically challenging. Choosing an LMS with strong API capabilities helps streamline this process.

c. Content Migration Issues

Transferring legacy content into the new LMS can be time-consuming. Organizations should plan for content audits and updates to ensure smooth migration.

d. Engagement Challenges

Without engaging content, learners may lose interest. Incorporating interactive elements like videos, gamification, and social learning features can boost engagement (Cheng et al., 2011; Strother et al., 2002).

e. Cost Overruns

Hidden costs related to customization, training, or third-party integrations can strain budgets. A clear understanding of the total cost of ownership (TCO) is essential before implementation.

The Future of Corporate LMS Solutions

As technology continues to evolve, so do Corporate LMS solutions (Littlejohn et al., 2014). Here are some key trends shaping the future of corporate learning (eLearning Journal, 2018):

  • AI and Machine Learning: Personalized learning paths, predictive analytics, and automated content recommendations (Abaricia et al., 2023).
  • Microlearning and Just-in-Time Training: Short, focused modules for on-demand learning.
  • Virtual and Augmented Reality (VR/AR): Immersive learning experiences, particularly useful for hands-on industries like manufacturing and healthcare.
  • Social Learning and Collaboration Tools: Integration with social platforms to enhance peer-to-peer learning (Arbaugh et al., 2008).
  • Data-Driven Learning: Advanced analytics for real-time performance tracking and skill gap analysis.

Key Metrics to Evaluate the Success of a Corporate LMS Solution

Evaluating the success of a Corporate Learning Management System (LMS) requires tracking key performance indicators (KPIs) that align with organizational goals (Wang, 2011). These metrics provide insights into the effectiveness, efficiency, and impact of the LMS on employee development and business outcomes. 

Common KPI’s include:

  • Course Completion Rates: Measures the percentage of employees who complete assigned courses, indicating learner engagement and course relevance.
  • Assessment Scores: Tracks learner performance on quizzes and exams to gauge knowledge retention.
  • Time to Competency: Evaluates how quickly employees achieve proficiency in new skills after completing training.
  • Employee Engagement Metrics: Includes participation rates, log-ins, time spent on learning activities, and interaction levels within the LMS.
  • Training ROI (Return on Investment): Compares training costs with measurable business outcomes, such as improved productivity, reduced errors, or increased sales (Kirkpatrick et al., 2006).
  • Compliance Rates: Monitors completion of mandatory compliance training, critical in regulated industries.
  • Feedback and Satisfaction Surveys: Gathers learner feedback to assess course quality (Eom et al., 2018), content relevance, and overall LMS usability (Mohammadi et al., 2015).

By regularly analyzing these metrics, organizations can identify areas for improvement, optimize training programs, and demonstrate the LMS’s value to stakeholders.

How to Ensure Data Security in Corporate LMS Solutions

Ensuring data security in Corporate LMS solutions is critical, as these platforms handle sensitive information such as employee data, performance records, and compliance certifications. A breach can lead to legal liabilities, financial loss, and reputational damage. 

Here are key strategies to enhance LMS data security:

  • Data Encryption: Use strong encryption protocols (e.g., SSL/TLS) to protect data during transmission and at rest.
  • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Limit data access based on user roles (e.g., administrators, learners) to prevent unauthorized access.
  • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Add an extra layer of security by requiring multiple verification methods during login.
  • Regular Security Audits: Conduct routine vulnerability assessments and penetration testing to identify and fix security gaps.
  • Compliance with Regulations: Ensure the LMS complies with data protection laws like GDPR, HIPAA, or SOC 2, depending on industry requirements.
  • Secure Hosting Environment: Choose LMS vendors that offer secure cloud hosting with ISO 27001 certification or equivalent.
  • Data Backup and Recovery: Implement automated backups and disaster recovery plans to protect against data loss.

Proactive security measures ensure the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of LMS data.

LMS Customization: Balancing Flexibility and Standardization

Customizing a Corporate LMS is essential for aligning training programs with an organization’s unique culture (Newton et al., 2003), branding, and learning objectives (Alonso et al., 2008). However, finding the right balance between flexibility and standardization is key to maintaining system efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

  • Flexibility: Customization allows organizations to tailor user interfaces, learning paths (Sun et al., 2008), and content delivery to meet specific needs. This can enhance learner engagement through personalized dashboards, branded themes, and adaptive learning experiences (Sharma et al., 2008). It also supports diverse training requirements across different departments or regions.
  • Standardization: Standardizing core functionalities ensures consistency in content delivery, compliance tracking, and reporting across the organization. It simplifies system maintenance, reduces costs (Appana et al., 2008), and improves scalability, especially for large enterprises with global operations.

To achieve the right balance:

  • Prioritize Business Goals: Focus on customizing features that directly impact learning outcomes or business objectives (Zhang et al., 2004).
  • Use Modular Design: Choose an LMS that supports modular customization, allowing flexibility without disrupting the core system.
  • Limit Over-Customization: Avoid unnecessary customizations that can complicate updates, integrations, and system upgrades.

Striking the right balance enhances learner engagement while ensuring operational efficiency.

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Implementing a Corporate LMS

Implementing a Corporate LMS can be transformative, but organizations often encounter pitfalls that hinder its success. Avoiding these common mistakes ensures a smoother rollout and maximizes the LMS’s effectiveness:

  1. Lack of Clear Objectives: Failing to define specific goals (e.g., improving compliance, reducing onboarding time) leads to unclear outcomes. Establish measurable KPIs to track success (Wang, 2011).
  2. Ignoring User Experience (UX): A complex, unintuitive interface can reduce learner engagement (eLearning Journal, 2018). Prioritize LMS platforms with user-friendly designs that cater to both administrators and learners (Sun et al., 2008).
  3. Underestimating Change Management: Resistance to new technology is common. Without proper communication (Kang et al., 2013), training, and stakeholder buy-in (Brown et al., 2013), adoption rates may suffer (Mohammadi et al., 2015).
  4. Inadequate Content Strategy: Simply migrating existing content without optimizing it for digital learning can result in low engagement. Invest in interactive (Strother et al., 2002), mobile-friendly, and updated content (Liaw et al., 2008).
  5. Neglecting Integration Needs: Overlooking the importance of integrating the LMS with HR systems, CRM, or collaboration tools can lead to data silos and inefficiencies.
  6. Poor Vendor Selection: Choosing an LMS based solely on cost without considering scalability, support, and security features can result in long-term challenges.
  7. Failure to Evaluate and Iterate: Post-implementation, not monitoring performance metrics or gathering feedback limits continuous improvement.

Proactive planning, stakeholder involvement, and regular assessments (Govindasamy et al., 2001) ensure successful LMS implementation.

Summary

Corporate LMS solutions are comprehensive platforms designed to manage, deliver, and optimize employee training, professional development, and compliance programs. They offer features like course management, user tracking, mobile learning, and data-driven analytics, supporting diverse learning needs across industries. Organizations benefit from improved training efficiency, consistent learning experiences, cost savings, and enhanced employee engagement. Key success factors include defining clear objectives, balancing customization with standardization, ensuring data security, and avoiding common implementation mistakes. With evolving technologies like AI, VR, and microlearning, Corporate LMS solutions continue to shape the future of workforce development.

Bibliography
  1. Abaricia, C. P., & Delos Santos, M. L. C. (2023). Enhancing e-learning systems through learning management system (LMS) technologies: Reshaping the learner experience. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12354.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12354
  2. Allen, E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Sloan Consortium.
    https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529930.pdf
  3. Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2008). Learning objects, learning objectives and learning design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 389–400.
    https://oa.upm.es/2424/1/INVE_MEM_2008_55924.pdf
  4. Appana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(1), 5–22.
    https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22909/
  5. Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–21.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26520832_Does_the_Community_of_Inquiry_Framework_Predict_Outcomes_in_Online_MBA_Courses 
  6. Brown, K. G. and Charlier S.D. (2013). An integrative model of e-learning use: Leveraging theory to understand and increase usage. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 37–49.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053482212000472 
  7. Cheng, B., Wang, M., Mørch, A. I., Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (2014). Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 11, 56–72.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1747938X14
  8. Cheng, B., Wang, M., Yang, S. J., Kinshuk, & Peng, J. (2011). Acceptance of competency-based workplace e-learning systems: Effects of individual and peer learning support. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1317–1333.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131511000352
  9. Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U. (2018). Learning management systems in the workplace: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 189–197).
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330475653_Learning_Management_Systems_in_the_Workplace_A_Literature_Review
  10. Díaz-Redondo, R. P., Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., López-Escobar, J. J., & Fernández-Vilas, A. (2023). Integrating micro-learning content in traditional e-learning platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06500.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06500
  11. eLearning Journal. (2018). LMS are still popular – but will their use remain stable in the future? eLearning Journal.
    https://www.elearning-journal.com/en/2018/10/10/LMS-are-still-popular/
  12. Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. (2018). A system’s view of e-learning success model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 16(1), 42-76.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322783738_A_System's_View_of_E-Learning_Success_Model
  13. Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3–4), 287–299.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751601000719
  14. Hameed, S., Badii, A., & Cullen, A. J. (2008). Effective e-learning integration with traditional learning in a blended environment. In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228422212_Effective_E-Learning_Integration_with_Traditional_Learning_in_a_Blended_Learning_Environment 
  15. Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of tablet PCs in corporate training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 1026–1033.
  16. Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner–instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 292–301.
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcal.12005
  17. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
    https://bkconnection.com/static/Evaluating_Training_Programs_EXCERPT.pdf
  18. Lee, Y., Hsieh, Y. C., & Chen, Y. H. (2013). An investigation of employees’ use of e-learning systems: Applying the technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 173–189.
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144929X.2011.577190 
  19. Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131507001029
  20. Littlejohn, Allison and Margaryan, Anoush (2014). Technology-enhanced Professional Learning. In: Billet, Stephen; Harteis, Christian and Gruber, Hans eds. International Handbook on Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1187–1212.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
  21. Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m‑learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211–1219.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131510001508
  22. Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359–374. (Posted revision 2018).
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563214003225
  23. Newton, R. (2003). Staff attitudes to the development and delivery of e-learning. New Library World, Vol. 104 No. 10, pp. 412-425.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03074800310504357
  24. Nguyen, T. V., Pham, H. T., & Le, Q. N. (2023). E-Learning-Based Cloud Computing Environment: A Systematic Review, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Access, 11, 13045–13063.
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/6287639/10380310/10341232.pdf
  25. Reams, J. (2024). The Quest for Leadership Using the Technology of MyQuest for Leader Development. Center for Transformative Leadership. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380169282
  26. Richey, J. E., & Misiolek, N. (2023). Gamification and soft skills assessment in the development of a serious game. JMIR Serious Games, 11(1), e45436.
    https://games.jmir.org/2023/1/e45436/
  27. Roffe, I. (2002). E-learning: engagement, enhancement and execution. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(1), 40–50.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09684880210416102/full/html
  28. Sharma, R., Gupta, P., & Kumar, M. (2008). A framework for adaptive e-learning systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 112–119). IEEE.
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4670262
  29. Shurygin, V., Saenko, N., Zekiy, A., Klochko, E., & Kulapov, M. (2021). Learning Management Systems in Academic and Corporate Distance Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(11), 121–139.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352134234_Learning_Management_Systems_in_Academic_and_Corporate_Distance_Education
  30. Strother, J. (2002). An assessment of the effectiveness of e-learning in corporate training programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1–17.
    https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/83
  31. Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131506001874
  32. Wang, M. (2011). Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(3), 191–205.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
  33. Wasilik, O., & Bolliger, D. U. (2009). Faculty satisfaction in the online environment: An institutional study. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 173–178.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751609000190
  34. Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr., J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75–79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200465318_can_E-learning_Replace_Classroom_Learning
Additional Information

Looking for an LMS?

MyQuest LMS is the best Learning Management System (LMS) platform for SMBs, training companies and online coaching. MyQuest LMS offers Action-Based Learning with Personalized Feedback for Optimal Skill Development (Reams, 2024). With our “Quest Builder,” you can easily create gamified training experiences structured around practical activities. Each activity is followed by personalized feedback from an expert, peers, or an AI assistant trained on your content.

Want to learn more about MyQuest LMS?

Further reading about MyQuest LMS:

Questions? Suggestions? Remarks?

Contact us at: info@myquest.co