LMS for Employees

LMS for Employees

by Ari Manor
|
Jun 03, 2025

This article, about LMS for Employees, includes the following chapters:

LMS for Employees

Bibliography

Additional Information

The article is one in a series of dozens of articles included in our Corporate LMS Guide, a guide that provides the most detailed and updated information about Corporate LMS. For other articles in the series see:

The Full Guide to Corporate LMS

Note: We strive to help you understand and implement LMS (Learning Management System) solutions in the best possible way, based on up-to-date, research-based information. To achieve this, we have included references to reliable sources and practical examples from the business world in our articles. We regularly update the content to ensure its relevance and accuracy, but it is important to personally verify that the information is accurate and that its application fits your organization’s needs and goals. If you find an error in the article or are aware of a more updated and relevant source, we would be happy if you contacted us. Good luck on your journey to improving the learning experiences in your organization!

LMS for Employees

In today’s fast-evolving business landscape, continuous learning and development (L&D) are essential for organizations to maintain a competitive edge (Littlejohn et al., 2014). A Learning Management System (LMS) for employees is a strategic tool designed to facilitate employee training, professional development, and performance improvement. It enables businesses to streamline onboarding, enhance skills, ensure compliance, and support career growth, all within a centralized digital platform.

This part of our Corporate LMS guide explores the concept of LMS for employees, highlighting its key features, benefits, real-world applications, and best practices (Salas et al., 2001) for maximizing its impact on workforce development.

What Is an LMS for Employees?

An LMS for employees is a software platform that enables organizations to create, deliver, manage, and track training programs tailored to their workforce. It supports various learning formats, including e-learning modules, instructor-led sessions (virtual or in-person), webinars, and blended learning approaches.

Core Functions of an Employee LMS:

  • Onboarding Training: Standardizes the onboarding process to help new hires integrate quickly into the organization.
  • Skill Development: Provides continuous learning opportunities to upskill and reskill employees (Noe et al., 2014; Littlejohn et al., 2014).
  • Compliance Training: Ensures employees meet regulatory requirements through automated tracking and certification.
  • Performance Support: Delivers just-in-time learning resources to improve job performance.
  • Leadership Development: Supports the growth of future leaders through targeted development programs.

Key Features of an LMS for Employees

To effectively support employee learning, an LMS must offer a wide range of features designed to enhance both the administrative and learner experience:

a. User-Friendly Interface

  • Intuitive dashboards for easy navigation by learners, managers, and administrators (Sun et al., 2008).
  • Mobile-responsive design for learning anytime, anywhere (Liu et al., 2010).

b. Personalized Learning Paths

  • Customizable learning journeys based on job roles, skill gaps, and career goals (Littlejohn et al., 2014).
  • AI-driven content recommendations tailored to individual employee needs.
    • Tip: Implement AI-driven learning recommendations to analyze employee skill gaps and suggest relevant courses, ensuring personalized development paths that align with career growth and business objectives (Cheng et al., 2014).

c. Course Management and Content Delivery

  • Supports diverse content formats, including videos, SCORM packages, PDFs, and interactive modules.
  • Enables the creation, scheduling, and management of courses with ease.

d. Blended Learning Capabilities

  • Combines online learning with in-person sessions, workshops, or live virtual classrooms (Allen et al., 2007).
  • Facilitates hybrid training environments, especially for remote and global teams (Hameed et al., 2008).

e. Compliance Tracking and Certification

  • Automates certification processes, tracks compliance status, and sends renewal reminders.
  • Generates audit-ready reports for industries with strict regulatory requirements.

f. Performance Analytics and Reporting

  • Tracks learning progress, course completion rates, assessment scores, and employee engagement (Sharma et al., 2008).
  • Provides data-driven insights to measure the impact of training on performance and business outcomes (Zhang et al., 2004; Bersin, 2007).

g. Gamification and Social Learning

  • Enhances engagement through gamified elements like badges, leaderboards, and rewards (Sitzmann, 2011b).
    • Tip: Introduce friendly competitions, achievement badges, and point-based incentives to encourage employees to stay motivated and actively participate in training programs.
  • Boost engagement and practical skill acquisition by using dedicated games for employee training (Richey et al., 2023).
  • Fosters collaboration through discussion forums, peer-to-peer learning, and knowledge-sharing communities (Cheng et al., 2011).

h. Integration with Business Systems

  • Seamlessly integrates with HR software (HRIS), performance management tools, CRM platforms, and collaboration tools like Microsoft Teams and Slack.
  • Enables data synchronization for streamlined workflows.

i. Security and Compliance

  • Ensures data protection with secure login protocols, encryption, and compliance with GDPR, SOC 2, and other data privacy standards.

Benefits of Using an LMS for Employees

Implementing an LMS for employee training offers numerous strategic advantages that go beyond traditional learning methods:

a. Enhanced Onboarding Efficiency

  • Faster Time-to-Productivity: New hires can quickly access training materials, accelerating their integration into the company.
    • Tip: Break down onboarding courses into short, focused microlearning modules (5-10 minutes each) to help new hires absorb key information efficiently and reduce time-to-productivity.
  • Consistent Onboarding: Standardized content ensures every employee receives the same foundational knowledge, regardless of location.

b. Continuous Learning and Skill Development

  • Upskilling and Reskilling: Provides employees with opportunities to learn new skills or improve existing ones to meet evolving job demands (Noe et al., 2014).
  • Personalized Development: Tailored learning paths support career growth and employee satisfaction (Cheng et al., 2014; Littlejohn et al., 2014).

c. Improved Compliance and Risk Management

  • Regulatory Compliance: Automates mandatory compliance training, reducing the risk of legal issues and penalties.
  • Audit Readiness: Simplifies reporting for compliance audits through accurate, real-time data.

d. Increased Employee Engagement and Retention

  • Interactive Learning: Gamification and social features boost motivation and participation (Sitzmann, 2011b; Strother et al., 2002).
  • Career Growth Opportunities: Employees who feel invested-in are more likely to stay with the organization.

e. Cost and Time Efficiency

  • Reduced Training Costs: Minimizes expenses related to travel, venue rentals, and printed materials (Appana et al., 2008).
  • Flexible Learning: Allows employees to learn at their own pace without disrupting work schedules (García-Peñalvo et al., 2015).

f. Data-Driven Decision Making

  • Insightful Analytics: Provides detailed data to evaluate training effectiveness, identify knowledge gaps, and optimize learning strategies.
  • Performance Impact: Links learning outcomes to business performance metrics, demonstrating ROI (Kirkpatrick et al., 2006).
    • Tip: Go beyond course completion rates by measuring training impact on key business outcomes like productivity improvements, employee retention, and compliance adherence (Zhang et al., 2004).

Real-World Examples of LMS for Employees

a. IBM – Personalized Learning at Scale

IBM uses its proprietary LMS to deliver personalized learning experiences to over 350,000 employees globally. The system leverages AI to recommend courses based on job roles, skills, and career goals.

  • Key Features: AI-driven learning paths, microlearning modules, and real-time analytics.
  • Impact: Enhanced employee productivity, faster reskilling, and improved retention rates.

b. Deloitte – Leadership Development through LMS

Deloitte’s LMS supports leadership development and continuous professional education (CPE) for its global workforce. The platform integrates with performance management systems to align learning with career progression.

  • Key Features: Competency-based learning, interactive content, and certification tracking.
  • Impact: Strong leadership pipelines, increased employee engagement, and regulatory compliance.

c. Amazon – LMS for Global Employee Training

Amazon’s LMS manages training for employees across its vast global network, covering roles from warehouse operations to corporate functions.

  • Key Features: Mobile learning, just-in-time training, and compliance automation.
  • Impact: Improved operational efficiency, reduced onboarding time, and enhanced safety compliance.

d. Accenture – Skills Development for Digital Transformation

Accenture’s LMS focuses on digital skills development, supporting the company’s transformation initiatives. The platform offers curated learning paths in areas like AI, cloud computing, and cybersecurity.

  • Key Features: Blended learning, social learning communities, and integration with collaboration tools.
  • Impact: Accelerated digital adoption, improved technical proficiency, and stronger business performance.

How to Implement an LMS for Employees Successfully

A successful LMS implementation requires strategic planning, stakeholder engagement, and continuous evaluation (Chugh et al., 2018; Kirkpatrick et al., 2006).

Step 1: Define Learning Objectives

  • Identify key business goals and how the LMS will support them.
Common objectives to choose from include:
  • Onboarding Efficiency
  • Regulatory Compliance
  • Product Education
  • Soft Skills Training
  • Leadership Development
  • Sales Enablement
  • Cultural and Diversity Awareness
  • Mentorship and Coaching Programs
  • Continuous Improvement (Kaizen)
  • Succession Planning
  • Determine target audiences and their specific learning needs.
Target audiences for Corporate LMS often include some of the following:
  • New Hires
  • Frontline Employees
  • Mid-Level Managers
  • Senior Executives
  • Interns or Trainees
  • Remote or Distributed Teams
  • Channel Partners or Resellers
  • Vendors or Suppliers
  • Customers or End-Users
  • Volunteers (in Non-Profit Settings)
Learning requirements may, for example, include:
  • Skill Gap Identification
  • Employee Retention and Satisfaction
  • Multi-Lingual or Multi-Regional Training
  • Cross-Functional Collaboration
  • Remote Workforce Inclusion
  • Data-Driven Learning and Analytics
  • Professional Certifications and Licenses
  • Real-Time Performance Support
  • Gamification and Engagement Strategies
  • Global Standardization of Training

Step 2: Choose the Right LMS Platform

  • Evaluate LMS platforms based on features, scalability, integration capabilities, and user experience.
  • Consider cloud-based solutions for flexibility (Ekuase-Anwansedo et al., 2021) or on-premises systems for greater control (Nguyen et al., 2023).

Step 3: Develop Engaging Learning Content

  • Create diverse content formats, including videos, e-learning modules, infographics, and interactive quizzes.
  • Incorporate real-world scenarios (Roffe et al., 2002), case studies, and simulations to enhance practical learning.

Step 4: Engage Stakeholders and Promote Adoption

  • Involve leadership (Strother et al., 2002), HR, and L&D teams in the implementation process to ensure alignment (Brown et al., 2013).
  • Communicate the benefits of the LMS to employees (Mohammadi et al., 2015), provide user training, and encourage feedback (Bates et al., 2012).

Step 5: Monitor Performance and Optimize

  • Use LMS analytics to track progress, measure learning outcomes, and identify areas for improvement (Zhang et al., 2004).
  • Continuously update content to keep training relevant and engaging (Liaw et al., 2008).

Key Metrics to Measure the Success of an LMS for Employees

Tracking key performance indicators (KPIs) helps organizations evaluate the effectiveness of their LMS (Wang, 2011):

  • Course Completion Rates: Measures how many employees complete assigned courses, indicating engagement levels.
  • Assessment Scores: Evaluates knowledge retention and learning outcomes.
  • Employee Progress and Skill Growth: Tracks improvements in skills and competencies over time.
  • Training ROI: Compares the cost of training with performance improvements, productivity gains, or revenue growth (Kirkpatrick et al., 2006).
  • Compliance Rates: Ensures employees complete mandatory regulatory training on time.
  • Employee Satisfaction and Feedback: Gathers learner feedback through surveys to assess content relevance and system usability (Bates et al., 2012).

Challenges in Implementing an LMS for Employees

Despite the benefits, organizations may face challenges when deploying an LMS:

  • Resistance to Change: Employees accustomed to traditional learning methods may resist adopting new technologies (Newton et al., 2003).
  • Content Relevance: Keeping training materials up-to-date and aligned with business goals can be resource-intensive.
  • Integration Complexity: Ensuring seamless integration with existing HR and business systems may require technical expertise.
  • Engagement Issues: Maintaining learner motivation in self-paced environments (Sitzmann et al., 2011; Johnson et al., 2009) can be challenging without interactive content (Govindasamy et al., 2001, Strother et al., 2002).
  • Data Privacy and Security: Managing sensitive employee data securely, especially in compliance-heavy industries.

Addressing these challenges requires strong leadership support (Lee et al., 2013; Strother et al., 2002), continuous communication (Kang et al., 2013), and a focus on creating engaging, relevant content.

The Future of LMS for Employees

As workplace dynamics continue to evolve, several trends are shaping the future of LMS for employees (eLearning Journal, 2018):

  • AI and Machine Learning: Automating content recommendations, predicting skill gaps, and personalizing learning experiences (Abaricia et al., 2023).
  • Microlearning: Delivering bite-sized content for quick, focused learning that fits into busy work schedules.
  • Mobile-First Learning: Optimizing LMS platforms for smartphones and tablets (Ifenthaler et al., 2013) to support learning anytime, anywhere (Liu et al., 2010).
    • Tip: Ensure your LMS is fully mobile-optimized, allowing employees to complete training on their phones or tablets, making learning accessible even for remote (Shurygin et al., 2021) or on-the-go teams.
  • Social and Collaborative Learning: Fostering peer-to-peer learning (Bates et al., 2012), knowledge sharing, and community engagement (Roffe et al., 2002).
  • Immersive Technologies: Leveraging virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) for hands-on, experiential learning.
  • Skills-Based Learning: Shifting from traditional course completion metrics to competency-based learning and skills tracking.

Additional Corporate LMS for Employees Examples

  • SAP: Uses an LMS to support employee onboarding, compliance training, and leadership development globally.
  • Nike: Leverages an LMS to train retail associates, focusing on product knowledge, customer service, and brand culture.
  • Coca-Cola: Implements an LMS for global workforce training, covering topics from operational safety to leadership skills.
  • LinkedIn: Provides continuous learning opportunities for employees through LinkedIn Learning integrated with their LMS.
  • Pfizer: Uses an LMS to manage compliance training and continuous professional development for healthcare professionals.

The Impact of Microlearning on Employee Performance

Microlearning is a training approach that delivers content in short, focused bursts, typically lasting between 3 to 5 minutes. This method is gaining popularity in corporate environments due to its ability to enhance employee performance by promoting better knowledge retention, engagement, and efficiency (Díaz-Redondo et al., 2023).

Key Benefits of Microlearning:

  • Improved Knowledge Retention: Bite-sized content helps employees absorb information more effectively, reducing cognitive overload (Tennyson et al., 2010) and increasing long-term retention.
  • Flexibility and Accessibility: Employees can access microlearning modules anytime, anywhere, making it ideal for remote teams (Shurygin et al., 2021) and on-the-go learning (Sun et al., 2008).
  • Faster Skill Development: Focused lessons target specific skills, enabling quicker application of knowledge in real-world tasks.
  • Higher Engagement: Interactive formats like videos, infographics, quizzes, and flashcards keep learners engaged and motivated (Strother et al., 2002).
  • Reduced Training Time: Employees spend less time away from their core responsibilities, enhancing productivity without sacrificing learning outcomes.

Impact on Performance:

Companies that adopt microlearning report increased employee productivity, faster onboarding, and improved performance metrics (Díaz-Redondo et al., 2023). By integrating microlearning into an LMS, organizations can deliver just-in-time training that aligns with business goals and addresses immediate skill gaps.

How to Personalize Learning Paths in an Employee LMS

Personalized learning paths in an LMS tailor training programs to meet the unique needs, preferences, and career goals of individual employees (Cheng et al., 2014). This approach enhances learning effectiveness, boosts engagement, and supports professional development (Littlejohn et al., 2014).

Key Strategies for Personalizing Learning Paths:

  • Skill Gap Analysis: Use LMS analytics to identify gaps in employee knowledge and recommend targeted courses to bridge those gaps.
  • Role-Based Learning: Design learning paths based on job roles, responsibilities, and competencies required for success in specific positions.
  • AI-Driven Recommendations: Implement AI-powered algorithms that analyze employee behavior and suggest relevant content based on learning history and performance.
  • Flexible Learning Formats: Offer diverse content types (e.g., videos, e-learning modules, podcasts, and live sessions) to cater to different learning styles (García-Peñalvo et al., 2015).
  • Goal-Oriented Development: Align learning paths with employees’ career aspirations and organizational objectives to foster motivation and growth (Brown et al., 2013).
  • Feedback and Continuous Improvement: Gather feedback from learners to refine and adapt learning paths for continuous development (Bates et al., 2012).

Benefits:

Personalized learning paths increase learner engagement (Cheng et al., 2014), reduce dropout rates, and accelerate skill development. They also support succession planning by preparing employees for leadership roles through targeted development programs.

Using LMS Analytics to Measure Employee Training ROI

Measuring the return on investment (ROI) of employee training is essential to determine the effectiveness of learning initiatives and justify L&D budgets (Kirkpatrick et al., 2006). LMS analytics provides data-driven insights that help organizations assess the impact of training on performance, productivity, and business outcomes (Zhang et al., 2004).

Key LMS Metrics for Measuring Training ROI :

  • Course Completion Rates: Indicates how many employees successfully complete assigned courses, reflecting engagement and motivation (Brown et al., 2013).
  • Assessment Scores: Measures knowledge acquisition and retention through quizzes, tests, and evaluations.
  • Time to Competency: Tracks how quickly employees achieve proficiency in specific skills after training.
  • Performance Metrics: Links training outcomes to key performance indicators (KPIs) such as sales growth, customer satisfaction, error reduction, and productivity improvements (Wang, 2011; Zhang et al., 2004).
  • Employee Retention Rates: Analyzes the correlation between training programs and employee loyalty, job satisfaction, and reduced turnover.
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis: Compares training costs (content development, LMS licensing, etc.) with measurable business benefits like revenue growth, cost savings, and improved operational efficiency.

Benefits:

By leveraging LMS analytics, organizations can make data-driven decisions, optimize training programs, and demonstrate the tangible value of learning initiatives to stakeholders.

LMS for Talent Development: Building Future-Ready Workforces

An LMS plays a pivotal role in talent development, helping organizations build a future-ready workforce equipped with the skills needed to thrive in an evolving business landscape (Bersin, 2007). Talent development focuses on nurturing employees’ capabilities, leadership potential, and professional growth to drive long-term success.

Key Roles of an LMS in Talent Development:

  • Competency-Based Learning: Aligns training programs with core competencies required for different roles, ensuring employees develop the right skills for their career paths.
  • Leadership Development: Identifies high-potential employees and provides targeted leadership training, mentoring programs, and succession planning initiatives.
  • Upskilling and Reskilling: Supports continuous learning to help employees acquire new skills in response to technological advancements, industry shifts, and organizational changes (Littlejohn et al., 2014).
  • Career Pathing: Enables employees to explore personalized learning paths aligned with their career aspirations, fostering motivation (Cheng et al., 2014) and retention (Littlejohn et al., 2014).
  • Performance Integration: Connects learning outcomes with performance management systems to track progress, set development goals, and measure growth.
  • Employee Engagement: Incorporates gamification (Richey et al., 2023), social learning (Cheng et al., 2011), and interactive content to boost learner engagement and commitment to personal development (Govindasamy et al., 2001, Strother et al., 2002).

Impact on Organizations:

Organizations that prioritize talent development through an LMS experience higher employee engagement, improved retention rates, stronger leadership pipelines, and greater adaptability in the face of change. A well-designed LMS empowers employees to take ownership of their learning journey, fostering a culture of continuous growth and innovation.

Summary

An LMS for employees is a powerful tool designed to streamline employee training, support continuous learning, and enhance workforce performance. It facilitates key activities such as onboarding, skill development (Noe et al., 2014), compliance training, and leadership development, offering personalized learning paths (Cheng et al., 2014), real-time analytics, and seamless integration with business systems.

Organizations benefit from improved onboarding efficiency, employee engagement, regulatory compliance, and cost-effective training. Real-world examples from companies like IBM, Deloitte, and Amazon demonstrate how LMS platforms drive productivity, foster digital transformation, and build future-ready workforces. Additionally, leveraging microlearning, personalized learning paths, and LMS analytics helps optimize employee performance and measure training ROI effectively. As learning technologies evolve, the future of employee LMS solutions will focus on AI-driven personalization, mobile-first learning, and skills-based talent development, fostering a culture of continuous growth and innovation.

Bibliography
  1. Abaricia, C. P., & Delos Santos, M. L. C. (2023). Enhancing e-learning systems through learning management system (LMS) technologies: Reshaping the learner experience. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12354.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12354
  2. Allen, E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Sloan Consortium.
    https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529930.pdf
  3. Appana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(1), 5–22.
    https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22909/
  4. Bates, R., Holton, E. F., & Hatala, J.-P. (2012). A revised learning transfer system inventory: Factorial replication and validation. Human Resource Development International, 15(5), 549–569.
    https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-28225-004
  5. Bersin, J. (2007, January). Trends, areas of focus and predictions for 2007 [White paper]. Brandon Hall Group.
    https://www.cedma-europe.org/newsletter%20articles/Brandon%20Hall/Bersin%20-%20Trends,%20Areas%20of%20Focus%20and%20Predictions%20for%202007%20(Jan%2007).pdf
  6. Brown, K. G. and Charlier S.D. (2013). An integrative model of e-learning use: Leveraging theory to understand and increase usage. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 37–49.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053482212000472 
  7. Cheng, B., Wang, M., Mørch, A. I., Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (2014). Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 11, 56–72.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1747938X14
  8. Cheng, B., Wang, M., Yang, S. J., Kinshuk, & Peng, J. (2011). Acceptance of competency-based workplace e-learning systems: Effects of individual and peer learning support. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1317–1333.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131511000352
  9. Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U. (2018). Learning management systems in the workplace: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 189–197).
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330475653_Learning_Management_Systems_in_the_Workplace_A_Literature_Review
  10. Díaz-Redondo, R. P., Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., López-Escobar, J. J., & Fernández-Vilas, A. (2023). Integrating micro-learning content in traditional e-learning platforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06500.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06500
  11. Ekuase-Anwansedo, A., & Smith, A. (2021). Effect of cloud-based learning management systems on the implementation process: Faculty and student perspectives.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10522
  12. eLearning Journal. (2018). LMS are still popular – but will their use remain stable in the future? eLearning Journal.
    https://www.elearning-journal.com/en/2018/10/10/LMS-are-still-popular/
  13. García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Seoane Pardo, A. M. (2015). An updated review of the concept of eLearning. Tenth anniversary. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 16(1), 119–144.
    https://doaj.org/article/80224f0585ed4779bfa0df4885e74450 
  14. Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful implementation of e-learning: Pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3–4), 287–299.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751601000719
  15. Hameed, S., Badii, A., & Cullen, A. J. (2008). Effective e-learning integration with traditional learning in a blended environment. In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228422212_Effective_E-Learning_Integration_with_Traditional_Learning_in_a_Blended_Learning_Environment 
  16. Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of tablet PCs in corporate training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 1026–1033.
  17. Johnson, R. D., Gueutal, H., & Falbe, C. M. (2009). Technology, trainees, metacognitive activity and e-learning effectiveness. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(5), 353–364.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02683940910974125/full/html
  18. Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner–instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 292–301.
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcal.12005
  19. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
    https://bkconnection.com/static/Evaluating_Training_Programs_EXCERPT.pdf
  20. Lee, Y., Hsieh, Y. C., & Chen, Y. H. (2013). An investigation of employees’ use of e-learning systems: Applying the technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 173–189.
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0144929X.2011.577190 
  21. Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131507001029
  22. Littlejohn, Allison and Margaryan, Anoush (2014). Technology-enhanced Professional Learning. In: Billet, Stephen; Harteis, Christian and Gruber, Hans eds. International Handbook on Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1187–1212.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
  23. Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m‑learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211–1219.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131510001508
  24. Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359–374. (Posted revision 2018).
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563214003225
  25. Newton, R. (2003). Staff attitudes to the development and delivery of e-learning. New Library World, Vol. 104 No. 10, pp. 412-425.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/03074800310504357
  26. Nguyen, T. V., Pham, H. T., & Le, Q. N. (2023). E-Learning-Based Cloud Computing Environment: A Systematic Review, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Access, 11, 13045–13063.
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/6287639/10380310/10341232.pdf
  27. Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014). Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 245–275.
    https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321
  28. Reams, J. (2024). The Quest for Leadership Using the Technology of MyQuest for Leader Development. Center for Transformative Leadership. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380169282
  29. Richey, J. E., & Misiolek, N. (2023). Gamification and soft skills assessment in the development of a serious game. JMIR Serious Games, 11(1), e45436.
    https://games.jmir.org/2023/1/e45436/
  30. Roffe, I. (2002). E-learning: engagement, enhancement and execution. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(1), 40–50.
    https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09684880210416102/full/html
  31. Salas, E. and Cannon‐Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499.
    https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471
  32. Sharma, R., Gupta, P., & Kumar, M. (2008). A framework for adaptive e-learning systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 112–119). IEEE.
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4670262
  33. Shurygin, V., Saenko, N., Zekiy, A., Klochko, E., & Kulapov, M. (2021). Learning Management Systems in Academic and Corporate Distance Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(11), 121–139.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352134234_Learning_Management_Systems_in_Academic_and_Corporate_Distance_Education
  34. Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 489–528.
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01190.x
  35. Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta‐analysis of self‐regulated learning in work‐related training and educational attainment. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 405–449.
    https://europepmc.org/article/med/21401218
  36. Strother, J. (2002). An assessment of the effectiveness of e-learning in corporate training programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1–17.
    https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/83
  37. Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131506001874
  38. Tennyson, R. D. (2010). Historical reflection on learning theories and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 93–95.
    https://www.cedtech.net/download/historical-reflection-on-learning-theories-and-instructional-design-5958.pdf
  39. Wang, M. (2011). Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(3), 191–205.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00371.x
  40. Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr., J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75–79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200465318_can_E-learning_Replace_Classroom_Learning
Additional Information

Looking for an LMS?

MyQuest LMS is the best Learning Management System (LMS) platform for SMBs, training companies and online coaching. MyQuest LMS offers Action-Based Learning with Personalized Feedback for Optimal Skill Development (Reams, 2024). With our “Quest Builder,” you can easily create gamified training experiences structured around practical activities. Each activity is followed by personalized feedback from an expert, peers, or an AI assistant trained on your content.

Want to learn more about MyQuest LMS?

Further reading about MyQuest LMS:

Questions? Suggestions? Remarks?

Contact us at: info@myquest.co